On Aug 31 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
> OK.
> I'd really appreciate hearing from anyone now who needs more time before
> a CFV.
Please don't forget that if anyone needs more time, they can always vote
FD.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED
Le Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:57:21PM -0700, Keith Packard a écrit :
> Sam Hartman writes:
>
> > OK.
> > I'd really appreciate hearing from anyone now who needs more time before
> > a CFV.
>
> I'd also love to hear back from Charles about the updated D proposal,
> and whether that helps him underst
> "Don" == Don Armstrong writes:
Don> I think attendance at meetings as well as participation in
Don> threads, drafting, and voting is a requirement.
Don> I think that this amounts to between 1-6 hours a month of work;
Don> hopefully towards the low end of that spectrum for a
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
> The biggest question I have is how much time do we expect TC members
> to have available for the TC.
>
> i think we've been having a lot of trouble that seems like it has a
> high probability of being related to insufficient bandwidth in TC
> members. So, I
Sam Hartman writes:
> OK.
> I'd really appreciate hearing from anyone now who needs more time before
> a CFV.
I'd also love to hear back from Charles about the updated D proposal,
and whether that helps him understand what it means.
--
-keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
OK.
I'd really appreciate hearing from anyone now who needs more time before
a CFV.
Sam Hartman writes:
> I think a bit.
> My big question is whether you think we'd still be able to call for a
> vote tomorrow if we make this change.
I think the change has real benefit beyond simple clarification by
immediately adopting Charles' changes to policy without waiting for
further chan
> "Keith" == Keith Packard writes:
Keith> Do you think the reworded version is easier to understand in
Keith> the context of the overall process? That was my major concern
Keith> here.
I think a bit.
My big question is whether you think we'd still be able to call for a
vote tomor
Sam Hartman writes:
> I ask you to retain the following two paragraphs that explain why we
> prefer option D should we adopt this:
>The Technical Committee has reviewed the underlying technical
>issues around this question and has resolved that Debian will be
>best served by migrating
I'd like to have a discussion about what we want from TC members before
we make a call for nominations.
The biggest question I have is how much time do we expect TC members to
have available for the TC.
i think we've been having a lot of trouble that seems like it has a high
probability of being re
> "Keith" == Keith Packard writes:
Keith> Thinking about this tonight, I've rewritten option D as AB +
Keith> patch.
Keith> As you can see, this makes packages shipping menu and
Keith> .desktop files for the same application buggy, makes all
Keith> packages using the Debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 636783 + pending
Bug #636783 [tech-ctte] proposed constitution fix for super-majority within the
tech ctte
Added tag(s) pending.
> # GR in process
> tags 795854 + pending
Bug #795854 [tech-ctte] Constitutional Amendment: Fix duplicate sectio
Package: tech-ctte
Severity: minor
User: tech-c...@packages.debian.org
Hi all,
following up after our latest tech-ctte IRC meeting [0], I propose to
hereby coordinate our decision-making process towards proposing two
candidate TC members to the DPL for a term starting in January next
year. I've r
Le dimanche, 30 août 2015, 22.01:27 Keith Packard a écrit :
> Thinking about this tonight, I've rewritten option D as AB + patch.
>
> As you can see, this makes packages shipping menu and .desktop files
> for the same application buggy, makes all packages using the Debian
> Menu System buggy, and
On 31/08/15 08:39, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
- issues not having a "mentor" within the committee;
I'd like us to try pursuing the latter idea: for each topic submitted to
us, we'd put one of us in charge of "making sure the issue keeps
moving": reformulating, pinging, leading, etc.
That see
Le Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:01:27PM -0700, Keith Packard a écrit :
>
> Thinking about this tonight, I've rewritten option D as AB + patch.
> OPTION D':
>
> Using its power under §6.1.1 to decide on any matter of technical
> policy, and its power under §6.1.5 to offer advice:
>
>1. The Techn
Le dimanche, 30 août 2015, 13.01:36 Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
> On Aug 30 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Nikolaus> Surely there is no need to single out the traditional
> > Nikolaus> menu as something that must not be used. It's
> > Nikolaus> sufficient if policy mandates the use of .desk
(Dropping the bug, this doesn't relate to it)
Le vendredi, 28 août 2015, 14.38:50 Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
> What I mean is that for more than one year, any vote on this bug was
> prevented by the TC waiting for any one of its members to catch up on
> the discussion, articulate his concerns, write
18 matches
Mail list logo