Cntrl: retitle -1 Please clarify that sysvinit support decision depends on
available sysvinit resources
Writing "Control:" without 'o' was on purpose.
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:03:48 +0200, Odyx wrote:
}... many wise words in an overheated thread ...
> It's not OKay for maintainers to
Dear TC,
Small reminder; the next Debian Technical Committee Meeting will happen at
date -d 'Thu Aug 30 18:00:00 UTC 2016'
in #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org
The current agenda is up-to-date in our git; please make any necessary
changes.
--
Cheers,
OdyX
signature.asc
Le vendredi, 26 août 2016, 12.55:56 h CEST Ian Jackson a écrit :
> There has recently been a thread on debian-devel ("Is missing
> SysV-init support a bug?) about the decision by a package maintainer
> to drop sysvinit support from their package. The maintainer has said
> they are reconsidering,
The September Debian Technical Committee Meeting will happen at
date -d 'Thu Sep 29 18:00:00 UTC 2016'
in #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org
The meetings.ics file [0] and the agenda were updated accordingly in git;
please make any necessary changes.
The meeting poll has also been
Christian Seiler schreef op 28-08-2016 10:07:
... warehouse of troubles that need a million hours of employment
each year to keep it going ...
- you will hate the day when you discover you've been scammed ...
Or, when other people constantly and irrationally bring up
libsystemd0 again and
On 08/28/2016 08:37 AM, Bart Schouten wrote:
> Sam Hartman schreef op 28-08-2016 1:37:
>> Similarly, if the community of people who care about sysvinit is
>> unwilling to spend the time keeping it working, eventually sysvinit
>> as a whole will be unmaintained and buggy.
>
> True, but I don't
]] Bart Schouten
> > I agree on this too. To the extent it should be considered
> > time-limited, it should be «until N releases after sysvinit is
> > removed» or somesuch, if that happens.
>
> In legal terms, in law, it would be considered that the burden of
> proof lies with those who want
7 matches
Mail list logo
