Ian Jackson wrote:
Obviously I disagree. I think the question is urgent. Please would
you rapidly overrule the debootstrap maintainers.
After we have ceased introducing new lossage we can have a proper
conversation about what the plan ought to be for buster and bullseye.
Well, please take
Simon McVittie writes:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 18:34:42 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Regardless of debootstrap defaults or flag days, we could also consider
>> moving programs from /{s,}bin to /usr/{s,}bin with a compat symlink in
>> /{s,}bin
>
> I'm not convinced this is a good idea: it
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 18:34:42 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Regardless of debootstrap defaults or flag days, we could also consider
> moving programs from /{s,}bin to /usr/{s,}bin with a compat symlink in
> /{s,}bin
I'm not convinced this is a good idea: it seems like it causes as many
Adam Borowski writes:
> Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:14:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > Julien Cristau writes ("Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster:
>> > Please disabled merged /usr by default"):
>> [...]
>> > > I'd suggest that this should be fixed by not shipping
On 29/11/2018 17:13, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:14:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Julien Cristau writes ("Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please
>>> disabled merged /usr by default"):
>> [...]
I'd suggest that this should be fixed
Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:14:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Julien Cristau writes ("Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please
> > disabled merged /usr by default"):
> [...]
> > > I'd suggest that this should be fixed by not shipping any packages that
> > >
6 matches
Mail list logo
