Re: Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

2019-02-24 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le jeudi, 21 février 2019, 15.28:23 h CET Ian Jackson a écrit : > Back in the wider world, of course many people build packages on > Debian systems for installation `somewhere else'. I have done it > myself and probably many of the people reading this message have too. > > What is implicitly

Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

2019-02-24 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mardi, 19 février 2019, 01.59:18 h CET Steve McIntyre a écrit : > While I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the overall point(s) here, > some of the points in this list of arguments seem dubious at > best. Maybe you could expand? Sure. Sorry for publishing a new ballot before answering. > >*

Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

2019-02-24 Thread Uoti Urpala
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 14:16:03 +0100 Johannes Schauer wrote: > I found that some important arguments are still missing. A recent mail by > Guillem [1] nicely summarizes also many of my own thoughts. I'm going to paste > the relevant content into this mail for convenience of the reader: I think

Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

2019-02-24 Thread Ansgar
Johannes Schauer writes: > With how merged-/usr is getting deployed via debootstrap, we are placing more > of the instructions of how a Debian system is supposed to be setup *outside* > of > the packages themselves (and into debootstrap). It would make a cleaner design > if we could have all

Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

2019-02-24 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 15:38:01 +0100 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Gunnar and myself have started working on a draft, the latest version of > which is available at > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tech-ctte/blob/master/914897_merged_usr/ballot.md I found that some important