Bug#981582: release-notes: bullseye to be the last release to support non-merged /usr layout

2021-02-01 Thread Andrei POPESCU
Package: release-notes X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org > Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:16:58 +0100 > From: Ansgar > To: sub...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: move to merged-usr-only? > User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-2 > > Package: tech-ctte > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > >

Bug#978636: marked as done (move to merged-usr-only?)

2021-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:13:11 -0700 with message-id <87r1lz7lug@melete.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? has caused the Debian Bug report #978636, regarding move to merged-usr-only? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?

2021-02-01 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 01 Feb 2021 at 13:35:28 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 03:34:27PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > I want to state (and not as part of the vote, but just as > > yet another DD) that the only way I feel makes sense to continue now > > is via Simon's ① option: Symlinking

Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?

2021-02-01 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Feb 01, Adam Borowski wrote: > I'd strongly urge the opposite order: FIRST decree that no package may > ship any file to non-canonical path (ie, have dpkg extract anything over > a symlink), and only then flip the switch. There is no "switch": this decision only certifies what we have been

Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?

2021-02-01 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 03:34:27PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > ...And to be clear: We at the TC are *not* doing detailed design > work. But I want to state (and not as part of the vote, but just as > yet another DD) that the only way I feel makes sense to continue now > is via Simon's ① option:

Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?

2021-02-01 Thread David Bremner
Sean Whitton writes: > ===BEGIN > The Technical Committee resolves that Debian 'bookworm' should support > only the merged-usr root filesystem layout, dropping support for the > non-merged-usr layout. > > Until after the release of 'bullseye', any implementation of this > resolution must be done

Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?

2021-02-01 Thread Margarita Manterola
Hola Sean Whitton! > ===BEGIN > The Technical Committee resolves that Debian 'bookworm' should support > only the merged-usr root filesystem layout, dropping support for the > non-merged-usr layout. > > Until after the release of 'bullseye', any implementation of this > resolution must be done