On 2021-10-13 19:37 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
> >The which(1) program must not print any deprecation warnings.
>
> I remain to be convinced on this point. If I understand the issue
> correctly the problem is with autopkgtests failing because they were not
>
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 1:45 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> the lintian tag
> possibly-insecure-handling-of-tmp-files-in-maintainer-script still
> recommend "tempfile or mktemp".
Lintian's last remaining reference to 'tempfile' was dropped. [1] The
updated tag description is now live on
> "CA" == Clint Adams writes:
CA> However, I don't think that this is reasonable for tempfile(1) unless
CA> someone is actually willing to package and maintain a tempfile(1).
just saw this..
i got hit by the removal of tepfile(1); pv-grub-menu uses it in its
postint script and its removal
3 matches
Mail list logo
