Bug#994275: Draft resolution for reverting changes in debianutils

2021-10-17 Thread Wookey
On 2021-10-13 19:37 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >The which(1) program must not print any deprecation warnings. > > I remain to be convinced on this point. If I understand the issue > correctly the problem is with autopkgtests failing because they were not >

Bug#994275: Reverting breaking changes in debianutils

2021-10-17 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi, On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 1:45 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > the lintian tag > possibly-insecure-handling-of-tmp-files-in-maintainer-script still > recommend "tempfile or mktemp". Lintian's last remaining reference to 'tempfile' was dropped. [1] The updated tag description is now live on

Bug#994275: Reverting breaking changes in debianutils

2021-10-17 Thread James Cloos
> "CA" == Clint Adams writes: CA> However, I don't think that this is reasonable for tempfile(1) unless CA> someone is actually willing to package and maintain a tempfile(1). just saw this.. i got hit by the removal of tepfile(1); pv-grub-menu uses it in its postint script and its removal