Bug#994388: tech-ctte: More specific advice regarding merged-/usr and implications of #978636

2021-10-22 Thread David Bremner
Simon McVittie writes: > I'm calling for votes on the following resolution as formal advice from > the Technical Committee (Constitution §6.1.5). There are no non-accepted > amendments, so the options to vote on are "yes" or "further discussion". > > begin text to be voted on > >

Bug#994388: tech-ctte: More specific advice regarding merged-/usr and implications of #978636

2021-10-22 Thread Elana Hashman
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:13:08PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I'm calling for votes on the following resolution as formal advice from > the Technical Committee (Constitution §6.1.5). There are no non-accepted > amendments, so the options to vote on are "yes" or "further discussion". I vote

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-22 Thread Elana Hashman
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:30:54PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > I hereby call for votes on the following ballot to resolve #994275. The > voting period starts immediately and lasts for up to one week, or until > the outcome is no longer in doubt (Constitution 6.3.1). > > ===

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-22 Thread Christoph Berg
> === Resolution A === > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > 1. The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program >until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least >transitively essential in Debian 12. > >For the Debian 12 release, we