Bug#835507: Please clarify that sysvinit support decision is not going to expire

On 08/28/2016 08:37 AM, Bart Schouten wrote: > Sam Hartman schreef op 28-08-2016 1:37: >> Similarly, if the community of people who care about sysvinit is >> unwilling to spend the time keeping it working, eventually sysvinit >> as a whole will be unmaintained and buggy. > > True, but I don't

Re: Bug#762194: Automatic switch to systemd on wheezy-jessie upgrades (thoughts)

Am 2014-12-04 18:21, schrieb Adam Borowski: On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: - Switchig depends order of init [1] (sysvinit-core before systemd-sysv) - won't work, because init is Essential, but systemd-sysv isn't, so this change would default

Bug#762194: Automatic switch to systemd on wheezy-jessie upgrades (thoughts)

Sorry, stupid webmail, sent my email to early... and only to the mailing list, not the bugtracker... :( To make sure it's recorded in the bug, and I also added something to the end: Am 2014-12-04 19:31, schrieb Christian Seiler: Am 2014-12-04 18:21, schrieb Adam Borowski: On Thu, Dec 04, 2014

Bug#746578: libpam-systemd to flip dependencies - proposal

Am 04.11.2014 17:07, schrieb Josh Triplett: This isn't a complete showstopper, since most of the time people seem to debootstrap a standard system and then install additional packages. However, it would affect a debootstrap with --include=task-desktop or --include=gnome or similar. Just as a

Bug#746578: libpam-systemd to flip dependencies - proposal

Am 02.11.2014 06:59, schrieb Josh Triplett: Apart from that, I would still request that someone with the ability to produce a modified local mirror test the two critical cases mentioned in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746578#129 . If those two cases work, then systemd