I wrote:
In particular, I think Steve's example is one where we should
certainly not compromise our principles just because some proprietary
software distributors are being uncooperative. Our political
opponents, with whom we are making a practical compromise, are giving
those of us who want
Ian == Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Ian And from a practical point of view, I would prefer to make a
Ian choice that significantly eases collaboration with the GNU
Ian Project to one that slightly eases collaboration with
Ian proprietary software vendors.
Steve Langasek writes (Bug#681419: Alternative dependencies on non-free
packages in main: counterargument):
Sorry for the delays in writing this up.
...
I believe the *spirit* of the policy requirement is twofold:
I won't repeat myself too much, but as I have said I think there is a
third
Sorry for the delays in writing this up.
Of the two options presented at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/debian-ctte.git;a=blob;f=681419_free_non_free_dependencies/cjwatson_draft.txt;h=f07b7d1c25adeb69d113640b1a5a900923cc0621;hb=HEAD,
I am unequivocally in favor of option A and
4 matches
Mail list logo
