Bug#830344: Moving forward with the Project Roadmap question

El Jueves 11 Agosto 2016 21:37 CEST, Lucas Nussbaum Ha escrito: > On 11/08/16 at 20:17 +0200, Margarita Manterola wrote: > > 2) The TC will act as an advisor to the Roadmap Team > > 3) The TC will not be involved as body with the Roadmap Team > > I'm not sure about those two

Bug#830344: Moving forward with the Project Roadmap question

I think that calling for that vote would be fine. I view that as an informalish internal vote, not some formal resolution that we're going to announce on d-d-a. Mostly I think we're going to try and figure out the direction at a high level. For options 1, 2, 4, and possibly 3, I think we'll need

Bug#830344: Moving forward with the Project Roadmap question

Hi, On 11/08/16 at 20:17 +0200, Margarita Manterola wrote: > 2) The TC will act as an advisor to the Roadmap Team > 3) The TC will not be involved as body with the Roadmap Team I'm not sure about those two options. Would (2) go further than powers already available to the TC under §6.1? What

Bug#830344: Moving forward with the Project Roadmap question

There seems to be mostly agreement on the fact that we want the Project Roadmap to contain goals with owners, allowing to track the progress of the goals and helping the owners promote them. As has been noted by Mehdi, this has a lot of nice effects like improving project wide communication of