Le lundi, 30 octobre 2017, 14.06:01 h CET Ian Jackson a écrit :
> I can see why the TC might want to avoid making a final ruling without
> proper input from the maintainers.
> But, should I upload to experimental, and later, to sid, as I have
> proposed ? It's not quite clear whose permission I n
Like Ian, I honestly don't know what the rules are in this situation.
Wou/ld it be reasonable for him to make an NMU to experimental, and then
if there is no objection after testing to unstable?
In parallel, it seems desirable to see if any of the maintainers are
active.
--Sam
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#877024: Modemmanager probing of unknown Devices"):
> No, that was not the tone of Ian's message. I wish it had been.
I'm sorry that my message didn't come across as Sam writes:
> He wrote the patch and said roughly "Hey, I know y
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#877024: Modemmanager probing of unknown Devices"):
> I wanted to make you aware of a status update.
> The maintainer who has been doing most of the uploads on modemmanager
> stepped down after receiving my query.
Oh.
> As a matter of proces
[Bug dropped; I don't think this has value in that bug log]
> "Ansgar" == Ansgar Burchardt writes:
In reading your message, I realize there is an interesting challenge
here. When I agree that it might be reasonable for the TC to take a
look at something, what is going through my head may b
Sam Hartman writes:
> Also, as may be obvious from my previous post today, I was shaken by
> some of the meta issues here. I am much more focused at the moment on
> thinking about the TC process and our community than I am about this issue.
If the ctte believes that escalating an issue to the ct
Dear Ian:
I wanted to make you aware of a status update.
The maintainer who has been doing most of the uploads on modemmanager
stepped down after receiving my query. First, I'd like to extend my
thanks to Michael for his hard work on modemmanager in the past and all
the things he continues to d
Tollef Fog Heen writes ("Bug#877024: Modemmanager probing of unknown Devices"):
> Given there's no indication they were made aware of your bug filing that
> I could find, I don't think that's a conclusion we can make.
In my message on the 25th of September I wrot
]] Ian Jackson
> Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#877024: Modemmanager probing of unknown Devices"):
> > Hi. In #877024, the TC was asked to rule on whether modemmanager should
> > continue to probe USB devices that might not be modems.
> >
> > There's
Ian Jackson writes:
> I intend to carry on and try to help do the Debian part of this, with
> NMUs as seem appropriate. My earlier email suggesting an upload to
> experimental is part of that. If the modemmanager maintainers would
> like to step in then that would be great of course. Just let
Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#877024: Modemmanager probing of unknown Devices"):
> Hi. In #877024, the TC was asked to rule on whether modemmanager should
> continue to probe USB devices that might not be modems.
>
> There's been significant involvement from upstream
Hi. In #877024, the TC was asked to rule on whether modemmanager should
continue to probe USB devices that might not be modems.
There's been significant involvement from upstream leading to a new
optional behavior that is less aggressive about probing unknown devices.
Would it help the maintain
12 matches
Mail list logo
