Bug#919951: ocaml builder must not be called `dune' or provide /usr/bin/dune

Dear technical committee, it would be nice if #919951 would be dealt with in time to allow affected packages to migrate to testing before the freeze. FWIW it looks like whitedune was now binNMUed, but dune is still blocked by #919953. Ansgar writes: > I am tempted to suggest that this issue is d

Bug#919951: ocaml builder must not be called `dune' or provide /usr/bin/dune

Ian Jackson writes: > Meanwhile there seems to have been no contact with the maintainers of > the C++ library which is the only hit on Wikipedia for > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune_(software) Whitedune also has a Wikipedia entry: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_dune So they are pr

Bug#919951: ocaml builder must not be called `dune' or provide /usr/bin/dune

]] Stéphane Glondu Hi, > Le 20/01/2019 à 23:14, Ian Jackson a écrit : > > In #919622 and the associated debian-devel thread, > > "Conflict over /usr/bin/dune" > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/01/msg00227.html > > the file conflict over /usr/bin/dune was discussed. > > > > The r

Bug#919951: ocaml builder must not be called `dune' or provide /usr/bin/dune

Ian Jackson writes: > Package: tech-ctte > > In #919622 and the associated debian-devel thread, > "Conflict over /usr/bin/dune" > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/01/msg00227.html > the file conflict over /usr/bin/dune was discussed. > > The rough consensus of the debian-devel thread

Bug#919951: ocaml builder must not be called `dune' or provide /usr/bin/dune

Le 20/01/2019 à 23:14, Ian Jackson a écrit : > In #919622 and the associated debian-devel thread, > "Conflict over /usr/bin/dune" > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/01/msg00227.html > the file conflict over /usr/bin/dune was discussed. > > The rough consensus of the debian-devel threa

Bug#919951: ocaml builder must not be called `dune' or provide /usr/bin/dune

Ian Jackson writes: ... > > * Declare that no-one is allowed the binary package name >/usr/bin/dune other than the C++ library dune-common ^ I suspect you meant 'dune' there. BTW I agree (having followed the thread) that the consensus on debian-devel was that the choice of

Bug#919951: ocaml builder must not be called `dune' or provide /usr/bin/dune

Package: tech-ctte In #919622 and the associated debian-devel thread, "Conflict over /usr/bin/dune" https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/01/msg00227.html the file conflict over /usr/bin/dune was discussed. The rough consensus of the debian-devel thread was that /usr/bin/dune ought defini