Hello,
On Sun 19 May 2019 at 09:14am -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >> I think the policy editors could handle this by deciding amongst
> >> themselves how they want to interact with the TC and then writing
> >> a note to the TC along the following lines adapted based on what
> >> th
> "Sean" == Sean Whitton writes:
Sean> Hello Sam,
Sean> On Sat 11 May 2019 at 01:24PM -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> I agree that it would generally be unfortunate if we had policy
>> text that could not be changed by the policy process. I can see
>> rare situations where it
Hello Sam,
On Sat 11 May 2019 at 01:24PM -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I agree that it would generally be unfortunate if we had policy text
> that could not be changed by the policy process. I can see rare
> situations where it might happen: we might have legal advice requiring
> specific text be in
I'm not really sure that the point you bring up is all that related to
the question I was asking.
But I think the point you bring up is important and I hope relatively
easy to solve, so let's discuss it and try to solve it.
> "Bill" == Bill Allombert writes:
Bill> In my view it is detri
4 matches
Mail list logo
