On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Having said that I am concerned that there has been impropriety in the
process. In
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675610
Ron wrote
We'd like to have nothing depending on roar for wheezy
Without the
On Friday, July 20, 2012 23:22:33, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 07:34:36AM +0930, Ron wrote:
I see that Philipp asked you to undo the change and you have
declined, as is indeed your prerogative. I assume that that's
because you agree with Ron's reasoning, but without
Hi, I'm a member of the Debian Technical Committee.
Apropos of the dispute about celt which has been referred to the TC
I'm trying to understand the background to the removal of the
dependency from ices2 to roaraudio.
I have seen this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676541
On 12-07-20 at 03:42pm, Ian Jackson wrote:
Hi, I'm a member of the Debian Technical Committee.
Apropos of the dispute about celt which has been referred to the TC
I'm trying to understand the background to the removal of the
dependency from ices2 to roaraudio.
I have seen this:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:17:48PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-07-20 at 03:42pm, Ian Jackson wrote:
Hi, I'm a member of the Debian Technical Committee.
Apropos of the dispute about celt which has been referred to the TC
I'm trying to understand the background to the removal of
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 07:34:36AM +0930, Ron wrote:
I see that Philipp asked you to undo the change and you have declined,
as is indeed your prerogative. I assume that that's because you agree
with Ron's reasoning, but without seeing Ron's reasoning, it is
difficult to understand
6 matches
Mail list logo
