2017-08-31 19:08 GMT+02:00 Sam Hartman :
> > "Dominique" == Dominique Dumont writes:
>
> Dominique> On Thursday, 31 August 2017 13:58:23 CEST Thorsten Glaser
> wrote:
> >> > How about printing a "nice" warning explaining it would be a
> >>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> One thing you I would consider is that it would be nice if scripts in
> Debian packages were made more portable to other distros. So Debian
> packages should gradually change to use /usr/bin/node. I am very
> conservative about these
Le 1 septembre 2017 14:16:14 GMT+02:00, Mattia Rizzolo a
écrit :
>On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> One thing you I would consider is that it would be nice if scripts in
>> Debian packages were made more portable to other distros. So Debian
>>
]] Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
> There are _plenty_ of changes that one needs to care about in a stable
> upgrade: things like mandatory postfixing of Apache configuration files,
> removal
> of specific Python3 versions, removal of upstart, etc. Having to change a
> shebang isn't a big deal given
On Thursday, 31 August 2017 13:08:58 CEST Sam Hartman wrote:
> There are cases where people mix stderr and stdout. There are cases
> where people treat any unexpected output on stderr as a failure in
> automated scripts.
I rest my case. Thanks for the explanation. :-)
All the best
Jérémy Lal writes ("Re: Bug#754462: Bug#862051: nodejs (6.11.2~dfsg-1)
experimental; urgency=medium"):
> So, a short NEWS entry explaining /usr/bin/node is now available by default,
> and that /usr/bin/nodejs will stay available indefinitely ?
> Or even nothing and just a changelog entry ?
I
6 matches
Mail list logo