Hello,
On Wed 13 Oct 2021 at 08:13PM +01, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I'm calling for votes on the following resolution as formal advice from
> the Technical Committee (Constitution §6.1.5). There are no non-accepted
> amendments, so the options to vote on are "yes" or "further discussion".
I vote
Simon McVittie dijo [Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:13:08PM +0100]:
> I'm calling for votes on the following resolution as formal advice from
> the Technical Committee (Constitution §6.1.5). There are no non-accepted
> amendments, so the options to vote on are "yes" or "further discussion".
My vote on
Hello,
On Wed 13 Oct 2021 at 07:37PM -03, David Bremner wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> 1. Offer advice:
>
>>The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program
>>until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least
>>transitively essential in
Your message dated Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:17:57 -0700
with message-id <87sfwyqh0a@melete.silentflame.com>
and subject line tech-ctte: More specific advice regarding merged-/usr and
implications of #978636
has caused the Debian Bug report #994388,
regarding tech-ctte: More specific advice
Hello,
On Sat 16 Oct 2021 at 05:50AM GMT, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 01:05:50PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>>The debianutils package must continue to provide the tempfile(1)
>>program until a compatible utility is available in a package that is
>>at least
> I'm calling for votes on the following resolution as formal advice from
> the Technical Committee (Constitution §6.1.5). There are no non-accepted
> amendments, so the options to vote on are "yes" or "further discussion".
My vote on the text quoted below:
yes > further discussion
>
>
Re: Simon McVittie
> I'm calling for votes on the following resolution as formal advice from
> the Technical Committee (Constitution §6.1.5). There are no non-accepted
> amendments, so the options to vote on are "yes" or "further discussion".
I vote yes > further discussion.
> begin text to
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:28:52AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> There have been other reports of failures due to the message on stderr,
> autopkgtest is not the only one (wookey mentionned a build failure).
>
> In any case, a message saying that which is deprecated when in fact
> `which` will
Re: Adam Borowski
> I'm even considering a MBF to go the _other_ way: change all but most
> obviously correct uses of `command -v` to `which`.
Please just don't.
Christoph
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, David Bremner wrote:
> >The which(1) program must not print any deprecation warnings.
>
> I remain to be convinced on this point. If I understand the issue
> correctly the problem is with autopkgtests failing because they were not
> expecting output on stderr. I
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:13:08PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I'm calling for votes on the following resolution as formal advice from
> the Technical Committee (Constitution §6.1.5). There are no non-accepted
> amendments, so the options to vote on are "yes" or "further discussion".
I vote:
11 matches
Mail list logo
