Hello,
On Wed 13 Oct 2021 at 07:37PM -03, David Bremner wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> 1. Offer advice:
>
>>The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program
>>until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least
>>transitively essential in
Re: Adam Borowski
> I'm even considering a MBF to go the _other_ way: change all but most
> obviously correct uses of `command -v` to `which`.
Please just don't.
Christoph
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:28:52AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> There have been other reports of failures due to the message on stderr,
> autopkgtest is not the only one (wookey mentionned a build failure).
>
> In any case, a message saying that which is deprecated when in fact
> `which` will
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, David Bremner wrote:
> >The which(1) program must not print any deprecation warnings.
>
> I remain to be convinced on this point. If I understand the issue
> correctly the problem is with autopkgtests failing because they were not
> expecting output on stderr. I
On 2021-10-13 19:37 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
> >The which(1) program must not print any deprecation warnings.
>
> I remain to be convinced on this point. If I understand the issue
> correctly the problem is with autopkgtests failing because they were not
>
Sean Whitton writes:
> 1. Offer advice:
>The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program
>until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least
>transitively essential in Debian 12.
Is it really advice if we say "must"?
> 2. Overrule
Dear all,
We think we might have a consensus on the following resolution text. We
could be wrong, as the judgement of consensus has been made by just a
few of us. We agreed in our meeting today that I'll start a vote a week
from today unless a ctte member asks for a delay. Thus, we expect to
7 matches
Mail list logo
