On 3/3/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that this bug has been (silently) fixed in the latest version
of apt-file. Any objections to reassigning the bug back to apt-file and
closing this issue out?
I agree with you that this appears to be the right action.
If it turns
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 307833 apt-file
Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed
Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl
Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl
Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned
Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:35:02AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the
maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who
are interested in helping maintain this package.
Would any of the keen people we see
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 307833 tech-ctte
Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed
Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl
Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl
Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned
Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on
I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the
maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who
are interested in helping maintain this package.
Would any of the keen people we see involved in this bug report
consider contesting the maintainership of
5 matches
Mail list logo