Re: Bug#307833: Processed: Re: apt-file: broken. curl is needed
On 3/3/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand that this bug has been (silently) fixed in the latest version of apt-file. Any objections to reassigning the bug back to apt-file and closing this issue out? I agree with you that this appears to be the right action. If it turns out that we're wrong, the bug can always be re-opened and maybe reassigned back to us. Thanks, -- Raul
Processed: Re: Bug#307833: Processed: Re: apt-file: broken. curl is needed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 307833 apt-file Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on curl Bug reassigned from package `tech-ctte' to `apt-file'. reopen 307833 Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed Bug is already open, cannot reopen. close 307833 2.0.7 Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on curl Bug marked as fixed in version 2.0.7, send any further explanations to Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#307833: Processed: Re: apt-file: broken. curl is needed
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:35:02AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who are interested in helping maintain this package. Would any of the keen people we see involved in this bug report consider contesting the maintainership of the package ? The Committee has the power in s6.1(2) of the Constitution to Decide ... who should be the maintainer for a package but of course only when developers disagree. Jesus, you write to Sebastien: In a previous conversation with me you pointed out that there are others downloaders that a user can decide to select, but failing to depend on at least one of the ones provided as a package by Debian renders the package unusable. Which is not acceptable. Can we see that conversation ? Are the emails archived anywhere ? The control file at the moment says: Recommends: curl, wget which is definitely wrong since at most one of these is used. Sebastien, what is your opinion of Mike O'Connor's patch ? I understand that this bug has been (silently) fixed in the latest version of apt-file. Any objections to reassigning the bug back to apt-file and closing this issue out? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: apt-file: broken. curl is needed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 307833 tech-ctte Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on curl Bug reassigned from package `apt-file' to `tech-ctte'. reassign 311329 tech-ctte Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on curl Bug reassigned from package `tech-ctte' to `tech-ctte'. reassign 323970 tech-ctte Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on curl Bug reassigned from package `tech-ctte' to `tech-ctte'. reassign 324153 tech-ctte Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on curl Bug reassigned from package `tech-ctte' to `tech-ctte'. reassign 325102 tech-ctte Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on curl Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned Bug reassigned from package `tech-ctte' to `tech-ctte'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307833: Processed: Re: apt-file: broken. curl is needed
I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who are interested in helping maintain this package. Would any of the keen people we see involved in this bug report consider contesting the maintainership of the package ? The Committee has the power in s6.1(2) of the Constitution to Decide ... who should be the maintainer for a package but of course only when developers disagree. Jesus, you write to Sebastien: In a previous conversation with me you pointed out that there are others downloaders that a user can decide to select, but failing to depend on at least one of the ones provided as a package by Debian renders the package unusable. Which is not acceptable. Can we see that conversation ? Are the emails archived anywhere ? The control file at the moment says: Recommends: curl, wget which is definitely wrong since at most one of these is used. Sebastien, what is your opinion of Mike O'Connor's patch ? Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
