Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list

2006-03-20 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Saturday 18 March 2006 17:32, Roland Mas wrote: Thaddeus H. Black, 2006-03-18 16:00:11 +0100 : It appears that to have a Enterprise Grade Debian Distribution, we need a SPOC [ed.: Single Point of Contact?] team which can address Enterprise demands quickly. Yeah, and its members

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 00:08, Adrian von Bidder wrote: On Saturday 18 March 2006 17:32, Roland Mas wrote: Thaddeus H. Black, 2006-03-18 16:00:11 +0100 : It appears that to have a Enterprise Grade Debian Distribution, we need a SPOC [ed.: Single Point of Contact?] team which can address

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Joey Hess
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? 3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with the patches ? 4) Wait! That hardware isn't officially

e1000 support in Debian [Was: Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]]

2006-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? 3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? 3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with the

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 20, Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: If you need a distribution which supports modern hardware, then you should switch to Ubuntu. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 02:43:38 +0530, Ritesh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Rui Silva
UBUNTU realy works, and is stable. I've instaled it on a few servers now, and i'm quite happy with it.but my question is. Why don't you just build your own kernel from source. download the vannilla souces and do it. it's not that hard on debian. it's easier on gentoo, but in debian it's almost

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Rui Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-21 01:02]: Since debian is build thru volunteer, why don't you contribute whith something... FWIW, kmuto-san has prepated sarge d-i images with a modern kernel: http://kmuto.jp/b.cgi/debian/d-i-2615.htm And backports.org has modern kernels for sarge. --

Hola, te he visto en el foro y en los tablones de anuncios:

2006-03-20 Thread
Hola amigos !!! Contesta a quien te prometa riqueza sin esfuerzo, que la gallina de los huevos de oro, dejó de ponerlos hace ya muchos años. Sin embargo creo que puedo presumir de haber encontrado un negocio con todas las de la ley, e incluso con las mejores comisiones de la red. Datos