Re: DE discussions

2016-02-13 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 11:44:55AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi. > > Amruth Chand wrote: > > Hey, why ain't anyone bringing in dwm? Sure, no config is a > > bummer... > > That's the point probably. > > > But just a few thousand lines of code sure makes it compile fast. > > Having to

Re: DE discussions

2016-02-13 Thread Amruth Chand
Since this is running into personal DE history quite a bit, I guess it's time I probably shared mine too. The fact is that I am quite a newbie to *nix world, just over 2 years in. After pecking around for over 3 year in Windows trying to make sense of the Win32 API and the general scheme of

Re: DE discussions

2016-02-06 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi. Amruth Chand wrote: > Hey, why ain't anyone bringing in dwm? Sure, no config is a > bummer... That's the point probably. > But just a few thousand lines of code sure makes it compile fast. Having to configure a software in C is probably worse than having to configure it in Haskell or Lua.

DE discussions

2016-02-05 Thread Amruth Chand
Hey, why ain't anyone bringing in dwm? Sure, no config is a bummer... But just a few thousand lines of code sure makes it compile fast. Add dmenu and powerline and it is pretty awesome!