On Friday 18 July 2008, s. keeling wrote:
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cool! Anyone want to do the full wave signature from Linus' original
release to now? We can analyze that, apply some filtering on it, then
divine a baseline wavelet we can apply to any software
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:24:05AM +0200, Martin Bähr wrote:
the effect on the user should also be taken into account.
consider the recent ssl incident. may be the biggest quake[*] in debians
history.
Hrm. I'd say the 'debian servers hacked' is possibly larger.
Neil
--
mooch If stockhom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-07-2008 10:05, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 06:09:09PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
So lenny will be Debian 5.0. Many people have questioned this
choice, given how we onconsistently went ...-2.0-2.1-2.2-3.0-3.1-4.0
in the
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 17-07-2008 10:05, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 06:09:09PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
So lenny will be Debian 5.0. Many people have questioned this
choice, given how we onconsistently went
Incoming from Martin Bähr:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:13:52AM +0200, s. keeling wrote:
Cool! Anyone want to do the full wave signature from Linus' original
release to now? We can analyze that, apply some filtering on it, then
divine a baseline wavelet we can apply to any software
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:13:52AM +0200, s. keeling wrote:
Cool! Anyone want to do the full wave signature from Linus' original
release to now? We can analyze that, apply some filtering on it, then
divine a baseline wavelet we can apply to any software project's
release history. I knew
6 matches
Mail list logo
