Steve McIntyre dijo [Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:16:19PM +0100]: > >Humm… An idea could be: > > > >‣ The term is defined to be for one year, with the possibility of one > > automatic renewal > >‣ If by (election date + 10 months) the DPL sends a (signed, > > validated, blah) message, a simple referendum is held: secret vote > > between a "yes" and a "no" (and... Further discussion? :-} ) > > ‣ If the DPL seeking renewal gets a majority, his term is prolonged to > > a second year > > ‣ If the DPL does not get a majority, he can still participate in a > > regular election > >‣ This mechanism can only be used once — A DPL wanting to run a third > > term must win a regular (full) election > > /me shudders at the extra complexity, especially how it would be > worded in the constitution. I'm tempted to say: let's just leave > things the way they are.
Oh, just wait until we get in DEP(n+1) where we require the Constitution to be automatically parsable as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110830222002.gb32...@gwolf.org
