Holger Levsen dijo [Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 05:31:50PM +0100]: > Well, my option "this is hard, my brain hurts, lets go shopping" was a joke > and essentially the same as the above. If you cannot wrap your mind around a > problem, please dont declare defeat for the whole project or propose silly > "solutions". Just because the problem is too hard for some, doesnt mean there > aint sensible solutions. Rolling a dice aint one of them. > > cheers, > Holger > > P.S.: Also, btw & unrelated: reasonable dices have 20 sides. Or 4 or 12.
I thought you were more seasoned in reading logic statements. >From Wouter's original proposal, it's clear to me that, given a 12-side dice, we have a 50% chance of sticking with sysvrc. With a 20-face dice, the odds are 3.5:1 in favor of sysv. Of course, were the Secretary to choose a four-sided dice, OpenRC proponents might be unhappy. But that's life when entrusted to random. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140126033114.gb41...@gwolf.org
