On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:47:34 +, Aigars Mahinovs said:
> You can make a openstack-fuel-agent package and it will be clear that
> it is useless to people that do not know what openstack is. ...
Not necessarily: "openstack-fuel-agent" (by itself) can just as easily
be
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, 21:58 Thomas Goirand, wrote:
> Could we have this discussion in the OpenStack PKG list instead? It
> doesn't feel like this list is the appropriate one. I also don't believe
> that any of the people writing in this thread are OpenStack users, are
> you guys?
On 04/21/2016 08:08 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Thomas Goirand dijo [Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:46:47PM +0200]:
>> In the general case, I'd agree. But we're not talking about "a package"
>> here, but about a complete *suite* of a complex cloud system.
>>
>> The argument is that you can't use OpenStack
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:00 PM Hubert Chathi wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:53:50 +, Aigars Mahinovs
> said:
>
> > I don't want to use OpenStack. I want to find a fuel logging
> > application to keep track of the expenses in my car. I search packages
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:53:50 +, Aigars Mahinovs said:
> I don't want to use OpenStack. I want to find a fuel logging
> application to keep track of the expenses in my car. I search packages
> for "fuel" and find Fuel. So I install it. ...
First of all, I don't see a
Thomas Goirand dijo [Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:46:47PM +0200]:
> In the general case, I'd agree. But we're not talking about "a package"
> here, but about a complete *suite* of a complex cloud system.
>
> The argument is that you can't use OpenStack without at least learning
> what the components
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:47 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 05:27 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This argument seems to suppose that no-one unfamiliar with a package
> > ever reads its name. This is an astonishing assumption.
>
> In the general case, I'd agree. But we're
On 04/21/2016 05:27 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Thomas Goirand writes ("Re: Package naming rant"):
>> On 04/18/2016 11:43 AM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
>>> There could be a simple rule of thumb - if the name of the package makes
>>> sense and is correctly understood without it being in the openstack
>>>
Thomas Goirand writes ("Re: Package naming rant"):
> On 04/18/2016 11:43 AM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> > There could be a simple rule of thumb - if the name of the package makes
> > sense and is correctly understood without it being in the openstack
> > context, then it can exist without the
On 04/20/2016 07:54 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:26:26AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> Moving forward, what I would like to see is an easy to use shell tool to
>> do what's needed. For example, something like this:
>>
>> debtags -kAC6B43FE -p python-shotgun \
>> -t
10 matches
Mail list logo