Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")

It's sometimes easier to take this list seriously :) On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2015, 14:18 + schrieb Ian Jackson: > > I'm the author of an AGPLv3+ perl module to which I'm considering > > applying a

Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")

Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2015, 14:45 + schrieb Ian Jackson: > I'm sorry if you feel that I used the wrong list.  I imagined I would > be told off in -legal for asking a non-Debian-related question. No need to feel sorry. I was just asking myself why you posted this to -curiosa (i.e. the "joke

Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")

Fabian Greffrath writes ("Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")"): > Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2015, 14:18 + schrieb Ian Jackson: > > I'm the author of an AGPLv3+ perl module to which I'm considering > > applying a licence exception (an `Additional

Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")

Hi Ian, Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2015, 14:18 + schrieb Ian Jackson: > I'm the author of an AGPLv3+ perl module to which I'm considering > applying a licence exception (an `Additional Permission'). why do you post this to -curiosa instead of -legal then?  - Fabian signature.asc Description: