Dirk Eddelbuettel writes [SuperCite undone]:
> Ian Jackson writes, answering a question of mine:
> > No. I suppose I'm suggesting that the browser packages use a shared
> > file like /etc/default-www-home or something, in much the same way as
> > other packages use /etc/mailname, /etc/news/server
Ian Jackson writes, answering a question of mine:
Ian> No. I suppose I'm suggesting that the browser packages use a shared
Ian> file like /etc/default-www-home or something, in much the same way as
Ian> other packages use /etc/mailname, /etc/news/server and /etc/papersize.
Exactly. Seve
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes [SuperCite undone]:
> [Ian Jackson wrote:]
> > A better solution would be to make it possible to reconfigure all
> > browsers' home pages at once.
>
> Are you proposing that a 'whatever' doc package reconfigures the browsers?
> I'd be afraid of quite some side-effects and
Ian Jackson has asked me to post this message to debian-devel;
apparently the UK academic network is having routing problems the
practical effect of which is that mail between *.ac.uk and other parts
of the world is not currently getting through.
This means no messages to debian-devel, among other
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> daid, regarding doclinux and docdebian:
> Why can't we just stick with `doc' containing both sets of
> documentation ? Is there any point in splitting the package up ?
I like the idea of separate docs collections for vanilla linux
and for incremental debian issue
[Reminder: ld fails when gcc is used with both -g and -lm flags]
I'm surprised no one else is complaining about this bug since it
really hinders software development under Debian.
For anyone who is interested, one solution is just to install the
experimental elf-gcc package. This one works fine
Package: linuxdoc-sgml
Version: 1.2-2
The /usr/doc/linuxdoc-sgml/guide.* files are from version 1.1.
See: guide.sgml:
This guide documents
Linuxdoc-SGML version 1.1.
I suggest the package is upgraded to version 1.4.
Thanks.
Guido Witmond -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP 2.6.2i k
Ian Jackson writes:
Ian> Why can't we just stick with `doc' containing both sets of
Ian> documentation ? Is there any point in splitting the package up ?
Having two packages permits the user to select the one she wants. There might
be people who can live without the HOWTOs or the Debian d
> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 11:06:00 -0500
> From: "brian (b.c.) white" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: New Packages-Master
>
> I noticed that the "Packages-Master" file now has a "filename:" field.
> I'm curious about what will happen when (if?) you create seperate
> dire
David H. Silber writes ("Re: RFC: A default html file"):
> > Thanks for the comments on doc, guys. I think I will package the old 'doc'
> > as
> > `doclinux' and create a new `docdebian' with Debian specific documentation,
> > especially as Ian M. promised the manual for today :-)
> > (As an asid
Erick Branderhorst writes ("ldconfig not found, bad path"):
> I had a slightly corrupted profile for root yesterday in which the
> path wasn't set for the sbin directory's (/sbin, /usr/sbin). Because
> of this an `ldconfig' command from some {pre,post}{inst,rm} script
> wasn't succesfull. Can we so
Hi all,
I had a slightly corrupted profile for root yesterday in which the
path wasn't set for the sbin directory's (/sbin, /usr/sbin). Because
of this an `ldconfig' command from some {pre,post}{inst,rm} script
wasn't succesfull. Can we solve this?
Adding the path for the command to be executed:
> Package: dvipsk
> Version: 5.58f-3
>
> Package: dvipsk
> Recommends: psfonts
>
> However, no psfonts package appears to be available.
Looks like it should recommend 'texpsfnt'.
Ray
--
LOGIC The principle governing human intellection. Its nature may be deduced
from examining the two following
13 matches
Mail list logo
