Moin Moin!
Today I've released the latest version of my HTML online help system for
Debian. Bugs reports are welcome :).
dhelp
What's dhelp?
dhelp is an online help system for Debian GNU/Linux. A Debian package
can register its HTML documents and dhe
On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Robert D. Hilliard writes:
> > This is Bug#16260.
>
> Is this really a bug in timezones ? It seems quite similar to the
> problem I have myself (as the maintainer - never heard of anyone else
> speaking on this) while upgrading e2fsprogs to 1.10-9.
Have tried a couple of times to subscribe to debian-sparc using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but I'm being met by a
deafening silence. Is there something wrong with the list server?
If I couldn't spell, I figure the list server would have told me
so :/
--
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion."
9980dbview_1.0.3-3.1_i386.deb libc6!
290268 defrag_0.70-3_i386.deb
40024 lurkftp_0.99-1.1_i386.deb
288158 majordomo_1.94.4-1.1_i386.deb
28442 mdutils_0.35-5.1_i386.deb Libc6!
69698 omirr_0.3-2_i386.debLibc6!
418514 tkdesk_1.0b4-2.1_i386.d
> this won't work, because some CD distributions (i.e. infomagic) are
> selled international. Therefor the english version is sold in
> Germany. I don't thing that a game like doom is worth the trouble. Let
> it be in the non-free section, where it belongs to.
Yup. However, it doesn't seem very i
> "bruce" == bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
bruce> Please be aware that the GIF patent issue is for WRITERS
bruce> only. Readers do not use the patented algorithm. Often you
bruce> can put the writer in non-free and leave the rest of the
bruce> program in main.
So is it ok
On 31 Dec 1997, James Troup wrote:
Troup> "Boris D. Beletsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Troup>
Troup> > If not, shouldn't we schedule one already. What are we
Troup> > waiting for?
Troup>
Troup> Gee, I dunno, maybe it's, at least in part, for the developers
Troup> who still haven
Please be aware that the GIF patent issue is for WRITERS only. Readers
do not use the patented algorithm. Often you can put the writer in non-free
and leave the rest of the program in main.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would prefer a flag in CONTROL. We have got a lot of programs with such
> problems. For example it's no problem to sell programs with GIF support in
> Germany, because there's not patent on this algorithm.
> The crypt programs are another group. You're
Hi Adam,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Heath) wrote on 31.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> adbbs
What for? Anything wrong with my adbbs package?
MfG Kai
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) wrote on 31.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Isn't there something *else* going on here as well? Namely, why does
> libc6-dev suddenly want kernel-headers, and a particular version at
> that, when neither it nor libc5-dev ever did before (and for
> good reasons?)
Hello Enrique:
Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is an "unofficial" deb package of the ultra driver. There is a link
> form Jaroslav's pages to the ftp site where you can download it. I've
> been using it for a while and it works fine, but the mantainer doesn't
> want to contribut
---Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, the kernel header files are getting to be quite
> architecture dependent, and hence if libc development packages
> continued to include kernel headers explicitly, we would need
> different headers for different architectures
Hi,
>>"Brian" == Brian Bartholomew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> Pardon me for a nosy question. Does Debian have any money
Brian> flowing in from users that is used to compensate full-time
Brian> Debian developers?
Not that I'm aware of. Contributing to Debian, as a developer
or ot
Hi,
>>"Christoph" == Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christoph> I want to be able to change the kernel-headers a program is
Christoph> compiled with. Certain tools (especially in 2.1.X) are
Christoph> dependant on a certain kernel version. Nothing wrong with
Christoph> providing the
Pardon me for a nosy question. Does Debian have any money flowing in
from users that is used to compensate full-time Debian developers?
Another member of the League for Programming Freedom (LPF) www.lpf.org
---
Brian Bar
"Boris D. Beletsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If not, shouldn't we schedule one already. What are we waiting for?
Gee, I dunno, maybe it's, at least in part, for the developers who
still haven't upgraded their packages to libc6, despite it being
available since April.
--
James - xinted anyo
Do we have any dates for Debian 2.0
release/code-freze/dead-line/anything?
If not, shouldn't we schedule one already. What are we waiting for?
thks,
borik
__
Boris D. Beletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berger Financial
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Browning) wrote on 29.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I find this hard to believe. kernel-headers and kernel-source
> > packages write to the directories kernel-headers-X.X.XX and
> > kernel-source-X.X.XX. They create
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yann Dirson) wrote on 30.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 30 Dec 1997, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) wrote:
> >
> > > So, timezone (7.48-3) is installed, and "required", so dpkg won't
> > > remove it. timezones (2.06-1) is available, and "replaces/conflicts"
> >
On Dec 30, Martin Schulze wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 1997 at 08:55:26PM -0600, David Engel wrote:
>
> > > today I upgraded the machine that hosts my debian mirror to libc6.
> > > Everyhthing went fine, only some partially resolved dependencies took
> > > some time but didn't meant a problem. Thanks
On Wed, 31 Dec 1997, Adam wrote:
Adam> 88640 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i386.deb Libc6! New upstream version
First of all this package is not orphaned, I am working on it's
libc6 version. Second, where did you find "New upstream version"?!
thks,
borik
__
Boris D. Beletsky
Isn't there something *else* going on here as well? Namely, why does
libc6-dev suddenly want kernel-headers, and a particular version at
that, when neither it nor libc5-dev ever did before (and for
good reasons?)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PR
Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> package (*) as you mirror it. This goes for CD images, too -- we'd have
> to release an 'Official Debian CD Set' and an 'Official Debian CD Set
> German Edition' because the former would contain any packages in the main
> distribution.
this won't work, b
On 29 Dec 1997, Rob Browning wrote:
> I think you overlooked part of my post. I mentioned that *I* had
> created /usr/src/linux as a link to /usr/src/linux-my-kernel-version.
> Then when I installed kernel-headers (because the new libc6-dev made
> me), kernel-headers saw the link, decided it was
9976dbview_1.0.3-3.1_i386.deb Libc6!
28442 mdutils_0.35-5.1_i386.deb Libc6!
418408 tkdesk_1.0b4-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
110198 wu-ftpd-academ_2.4.2.13-0.1_i386.debLibc6!
90140 wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb Libc6!
88640 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i
Hi,
>>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The vendor, I think. kernel-header-x.xx and kernel-source packages
>> have always assumed ownership of /usr/src; this is not a new libc6
>> thing.
Rob> It's new for anyone who has never ha
I NEED PHISH SEND ME THE LIST
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Just to mention, I haven't received the message that was quoted above, ie from
: Eloy Paris.
Give it sometime. master's load average was around 15 about 5 minutes
ago and I think master is the list server as well :-) Poor boy... I
couldn't even login via FT
Adam Heath wrote:
> Sure, why not. I am currently not maintaining anything. I have just had a
> lot
> of time(not much work currently), and my computer wasn't doing anything
> productive. Is this source available? BTW, that line is just part of my
> quote
> file.
There's no source, and I enj
| On Tuesday, 30 December 97, at 10:39:46 PM
| Joey wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
> Eloy A. Paris wrote:
>> Hey!! Somebody give Adam an account on master!!! :-) He will port to
>> libc6 the remaining libc5 packages :-)
Just to mention, I haven't received the message that was quoted above
| On Tuesday, 30 December 97, at 8:53:16 PM
| Adam wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
> | On Sunday, 28 December 97, at 9:47:22 AM
> | Richard wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
>> Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> wu-ftpd-2.4-27
> Done. Waiting for account on master.
>>
Cool. Thanks!
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Hey!! Somebody give Adam an account on master!!! :-) He will port to
> libc6 the remaining libc5 packages :-)
Adam wrote
> : I wish I had a life outside Quake.
Hey Adam, you want to maintain quake too? Maybe you can port it to libc6. ;-)
--
see shy jo, just kidding
--
T
Hey!! Somebody give Adam an account on master!!! :-) He will port to
libc6 the remaining libc5 packages :-)
E.-
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: | On Sunday, 28 December 97, at 9:47:22 AM
: | Richard wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
: > Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: >
| On Tuesday, 30 December 97, at 9:11:52 PM
| Eloy wrote about "Should I support xinetd in my Packages?"
> Hi,
> I received a message from a user that wants to know if I plan to
> support xinetd in the installation scripts of the Samba package. I
> need to enable/disable entries in /etc/inetd.conf
On 30 Dec 1997, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
> I was just upgrading a system from [hamm a few weeks old] to [hamm
> today] using, for the first time, dftp (instead of a mirror and manual
> dpkg -BORGiE runs.) I selected libnfslock, it created
> /etc/ld.so.preload, and since then any attempt to run a dyn
I was just upgrading a system from [hamm a few weeks old] to [hamm
today] using, for the first time, dftp (instead of a mirror and manual
dpkg -BORGiE runs.) I selected libnfslock, it created
/etc/ld.so.preload, and since then any attempt to run a dynamic linked
program gives a message, BUG IN DYN
On 29 Dec 1997, Marco Budde wrote:
> WL> Would it be allowed for us to have a non-duetch directory, which just
> That's ok.
> WL> It's going to get nuts if we have to have a non- directory for
> WL> every country, but maybe we'll have to do this. If that's the case,
> I would prefer a flag in
On Dec 29, Rob Browning wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The vendor, I think. kernel-header-x.xx and kernel-source
> > packages have always assumed ownership of /usr/src; this is not a new
> > libc6 thing.
>
> It's new for anyone who has never had kernel-headers a
Hi,
I received a message from a user that wants to know if I plan to
support xinetd in the installation scripts of the Samba package. I
need to enable/disable entries in /etc/inetd.conf to change the
behavior of inetd but this user uses xinetd instead of inetd.
Do I need to support xinetd as well
Am 29.12.97 schrieb harpo # udel.edu ...
Moin Will!
WL> Would it be allowed for us to have a non-duetch directory, which just
WL> wouldn't get mirrored (be default) in Germany?
That's ok.
WL> That way, if a child gets
WL> it, they've got to get it from someplace outside Germany, which the
WL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
> I volunteer to try rolling those patches into XEmacs 20.5. I think
> that configure ought to detect `liblockfile' and compile `movemail'
> accordingly. Sound right?
Sounds good, but perhaps it should just fail to build on a debian
system if libl
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The vendor, I think. kernel-header-x.xx and kernel-source
> packages have always assumed ownership of /usr/src; this is not a new
> libc6 thing.
It's new for anyone who has never had kernel-headers and kernel-source
installed before now (beca
| On Sunday, 28 December 97, at 9:47:22 AM
| Richard wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
> Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> wu-ftpd-2.4-27
Done. Waiting for account on master.
> wu-ftpd-academ-2.4.2.13-0
Done. Waiting for account on master.
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 30 Dec 1997, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) wrote:
>
> > So, timezone (7.48-3) is installed, and "required", so dpkg won't
> > remove it. timezones (2.06-1) is available, and "replaces/conflicts"
> > timezone, but dpkg (1.4.0.19) won't replace it, even with
> > auto-deconfigure. I
46 matches
Mail list logo
