I want to upload some packages to nonus, but I don't know how.
What's the correct way to do it?
I've tried anonymous FTP to nonus.debian.org, but I cannot
upload files to any dir...
Thanks.
--
Juan Cespedes
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word
Remember Emerson: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Why does glibc2 not use long long (64 bits) for dates, insead of long int
(32 bits)? Surely we ought to change this now along with all the other
libc6 changes?
We have to get POSIX to bless it first. We have 40 years to do it, relax.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Christian Schwarz wrote:
However, the `non-maintainer' part of this discussion is totally
unimportant. What matters is the question `in which cases has the version
number to be incremented and in which cases can it be left'?
I think we all agree now that the version
VI? You mean elvis, vim, or nvi?
Elvis seems to be somewhat flakey on hamm.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
For Deity at least is it VERY important that the version number of
packages be exactly associated with the .deb file, there must never be two
.debs with the same version that are not exactly the same. As soon as that
happens it is no longer possible
On 5 Jan, Christian Schwarz wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
I think that /usr/src should the be domain of the local admin.
I disagree.
/usr/local/src is for local admin.
This may be the case if you look at all packages, but I have never
installed any packages that did
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
On 5 Jan, Christian Schwarz wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
I think that /usr/src should the be domain of the local admin.
I disagree.
/usr/local/src is for local admin.
Indeed. In general:
- /usr/local is for the local
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
On 5 Jan, Christian Schwarz wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
I think that /usr/src should the be domain of the local admin.
I disagree.
/usr/local/src is for local
On 6 Jan, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
I think the general opinion was let the others take care of
not conflicting with us. So, the people on debs.fuller should make sure
that the version numbers they use will not be taken by 'official' .deb
packages.
This sounds nonsense.
People at
Where did you get this 4000 years figure anyway? 33 bits would just
Oh, having become hopelessly confused by the original posting, I came
up with some additional errors (the 16x10^18 is just as wrong, too;
584,942,417,355 is more like it...) Comes of posting to debian lists
in my sleep :-)
No. Someone else will probably do so. I am not using pascal at all right
now.
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Paolo M. Pumilia wrote:
Hi Christoph Lameter,
I am switching my linux system to hamm.
Since gcc upgraded to 2.7.2.3, it seems i cannot use
my old gpc compiler any more. Do you plan to package a
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 01:23:34AM +0100, Juan Cespedes wrote:
I want to upload some packages to nonus, but I don't know how.
What's the correct way to do it?
I've tried anonymous FTP to nonus.debian.org, but I cannot
upload files to any dir...
Why not try debian-incoming? At
Where did you get this 4000 years figure anyway? 33 bits would just
Oh, having become hopelessly confused by the original posting, I came
up with some additional errors (the 16x10^18 is just as wrong, too;
584,942,417,355 is more like it...) Comes of posting to debian lists
in my sleep
Kai is absolutely correct in his justification of the policy:
Umm. There's a good reason for not automatically modifying conffiles,
ever: ... was modified by you or by a script ...
The general rule, AFAIR, is for a file to _either_ be a conffile, or
_completely_ handled by scripts, and
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Christian Schwarz wrote:
Fact is, that the cron package, the local sysadmin, and possibly other
packages modify the /etc/crontab file. However, dpkg only controls
modification between the sysadmin and _one_ package (cron here). I
really think the cron package should
Christian Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yesterday, I wrote a script that scans our whole archive for .dsc files
(Debian source package description files) and outputs some statistics
regarding the `Standards-Version' fields, that is, which policy version
the packages claim to comply with
On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 09:12:23AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
: Packages may not touch the configuration file `/etc/crontab', nor may
: they modify the files in `/var/spool/cron/crontabs'.
:
: Doesn't this rule this out?
The mrtg
On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 09:45:39PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
What about a kind of tag-oriented style of appending to /etc/crontab after
asking the admin:
ipac-install suggest to append an entry to /etc/crontab, which starts ipac
every 15 minutes:
[line to be inserted]
The lines
On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 05:48:27PM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
I never understood why the kernel source was made into a .deb package. It
Because it's something we expect people will want to recompile,
so we should make it readily available to them.
doesn't make sense to me. I also don't see any
On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 11:54:14AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does libc6 depend on kernel-header ?
It's libc6-dev that has that dependency.
Perhaps weakening the dependency to Suggests might be the
Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does libc6 depend on kernel-header ?
It's libc6-dev that has that dependency.
Perhaps weakening the dependency to Suggests might be the best solution.
No,
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree that there seems to be a need for general solution. There are
two general approaches:
This might be completely off base, but what about a (hopefully small)
hack to cron for debian systems that makes it concatenate
/etc/cron.debian/* with
I just finished patching newt so that whiptail works as a complete
replacement for dialog, using s-lang instead of ncurses. I had to hack
modconf slightly (because it used leading - in menus, and that won't
parse), but it now works with whiptail. We now have all of the boot-floppy
components
Bruce == Bruce Perens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce I just finished patching newt so that whiptail works as
Bruce a complete replacement for dialog, using s-lang instead
Bruce of ncurses. I had to hack modconf slightly (because it
Bruce used leading - in menus, and that won't
Steve Greenland wrote:
Disadvantages: Limited control by packages over granularity, offset, and
user. (I'm not convinced that this is a real showstopper: if the package
*really* requires that fine of control, it probably needs a custom user
anyway.)
Another disadvantage is that this would
| On Tuesday, 6 January 98, at 2:28:26 AM
| Joey wrote about cron jobs more often than daily
Steve Greenland wrote:
Disadvantages: Limited control by packages over granularity, offset, and
user. (I'm not convinced that this is a real showstopper: if the package
*really* requires that fine of
Hello,
I ran across something very cool the other day -- Webmin
(http://www.webmin.com/webmin/). It's a web-based system management
tool, which is capable of doing things like cron jobs and DNS administration.
The developer has a version for Debian, and I think it would make a great
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 02:51:52AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
/etc/init.d/debian.cron to run the package that would next need to be.
Everytime that /etc/init.d/debian.cron is run, it checks to see when the next
package is to be run, and updates itself, and /etc/cron.tab.
Does anyone understand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Regarding Re: What's Debian's /usr/src policy of 8:09 PM -0800 1/5/98,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 11:54:14AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does libc6
On Tue 06 Jan 1998, Adam Heath wrote:
Have a directory, /etc/debian.crontab/, that holds a file for every package
that
wants to be run by cron. Modify /etc/cron.tab(in the master version), to
have a
line that runs /etc/init.d/debian.cron. Have a script, update-debian-crontab,
that when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: metro-motif-aout
Depends on xcompat which does not exist?
metro-motif-aout is an installer only and it does requires the x11 aout
libs from xcompat.
I think I can't do anything.
--
Lawrence---BeginMessage---
Package: metro-motif-aout
Depends on xcompat
On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 11:33:25PM +0200, Amos Shapira wrote:
I might be missing something here, but after being beaten by crackers who
simply put a password sniffer on one of my Debian machines, I'd strongly
recommand the Debian leaders to reconsider the policy of plain ftp and
telnet. In
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
Why not require packages that need this level of control over cron jobs
to register a user, so that a user-specific crontab (in
/var/spool/cron/crontabs) can be installed, e.g. with crontab -u
package file ?
Because sometimes the
Juan Cespedes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to upload some packages to nonus, but I don't know how.
What's the correct way to do it?
I've tried anonymous FTP to nonus.debian.org, but I cannot
upload files to any dir...
/pub/debian-non-US/Incoming
Sven
--
Sven
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 09:11:12PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: metro-motif-aout
Depends on xcompat which does not exist?
metro-motif-aout is an installer only and it does requires the x11 aout
libs from xcompat.
I think I can't do anything.
I
Yes, I could try that. Can the 600 use color and black ink at the same
time?
Also would you mind sending me your gs setup? I'm not sure about
uniprint but the stcolor driver usage in magicfilter is outdated, i.e.
it uses options no longer avalaible in gs-aladin. Or is that no problem
with
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Christian Schwarz wrote:
However, the `non-maintainer' part of this discussion is totally
unimportant. What matters is the question `in which cases has the version
number to be incremented and in which cases can it be left'?
I currently see three practical solutions out of the dilemma (that
/etc/crontab is edited by the sysadmin and scripts):
(a) We set up another crontab (say /etc/crontab.deb) which is maintained
by install-cronjob only. The current /etc/crontab will stay a
conffile and only be
Is auto-pgp still an active package? Or is it as outdated as it seems to be.
That means it is the only package on my machine that still has an AOUT
binary.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Mitchell) wrote on 06.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does libc6 depend on kernel-header ?
It's libc6-dev that has that dependency.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale Scheetz) wrote on 05.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
I think that /usr/src should the be domain of the local admin.
I don't think kernel-{header,source}-x.xx.deb should exist, really,
because I don't think source code should be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, there is a problem with the Gregorian calendar that has to be dealt
with in 2000 years or so (having to do with leap-millenia), but I figure
if it's more than 100 years it's no problem.
That depends on what you call a problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabrizio Polacco) wrote on 06.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6 Jan, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
I think the general opinion was let the others take care of
not conflicting with us. So, the people on debs.fuller should make sure
that the version numbers they use will not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Heiko, can dupload be changed to upload all files with one scp
when using SSH to upload?
See #13383.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Tue 06 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
Why not require packages that need this level of control over cron jobs
to register a user, so that a user-specific crontab (in
/var/spool/cron/crontabs) can be installed, e.g. with
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Christian Schwarz wrote:
I currently see three practical solutions out of the dilemma (that
/etc/crontab is edited by the sysadmin and scripts):
(b) We set up a certain directory (say /usr/lib/cronjobs) where each
package can install its own
Did anyone take over lyx? It seems as if we're close the release of a new
stable version.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen
Go
Christian Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
``Whenever the source package is changed WRT to the last uploaded
version, its version number has to be incremented. In addition,
if the source package is not changed but the binary package
changed (because it has been recompiled in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Mitchell) wrote on 06.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does libc6 depend on
rxvt 2.4.5 was announced on New Year's Day. As the current hamm package of
rxvt is still 2.20, it would be great if the new version is available.
There have been many improvements; I notice the difference immediately
when I happen to use 2.20 instead of the 2.4.x versions.
Paul Slootman
--
Can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Stone) wrote on 05.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Oliver Elphick (olly@lfix.co.uk):
Why does glibc2 not use long long (64 bits) for dates, insead of long int
(32 bits)? Surely we ought to change this now along with all the other
libc6 changes?
IIRC,
Paul, could you send me your diff file?
Since I am the original maintainer I might do a new upload.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I ran across something very cool the other day -- Webmin
(http://www.webmin.com/webmin/). It's a web-based system management
tool, which is capable of doing things like cron jobs and DNS administration.
The developer has a version for Debian, and I
should be able to recompile X with a different version number and
*only upload binaries*. What would redoing and uploading the source
Yeah, my recent experience with the sparc port confirms this. At this
stage, it seems that all of the non-x86 ports have system changes
that aren't usefully
upload all files with one scp when using SSH to upload?
Isn't that what ssh-agent is for? You run it, give it the pass
phrase, and then dupload forever :-)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
is there any debian policy on number of file descriptors compiled into the
kernel? (and also in limits.h in libc6-dev - AFAIK pretty much everything
that uses select() will need to be recompiled if the limit is increased).
some time ago the debian kernels came patched with 1024 fd's. this
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I think it does gain something; it is much easier to have multiple
versions around. If I compile a new 2.1 kernel and find that
it is not too good (like 2.1.76 seems to have broken sound
for me so I went back to 2.1.72), I can just reinstall the old
Sten Anderson wrote:
Now you are at it, I suggest that you also scan the archive for packages
that fails to include a Section and/or Priority field. It is far
too many, and it is quite annoying.
Do we want all packages to include the Section and Priority fields?
If so, then I think it is far
On 6 Jan 1998, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale Scheetz) wrote on 05.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
I think that /usr/src should the be domain of the local admin.
I don't think kernel-{header,source}-x.xx.deb should exist, really,
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 05:48:27PM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
I never understood why the kernel source was made into a .deb package. It
Because it's something we expect people will want to recompile,
so we should make it readily available to them.
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a purely practical point: I dislike having to type my passphrase or
password for every file I'm uploading. Heiko, can dupload be changed to
upload all files with one scp when using SSH to upload?
It seem you haven't read ssh's man page
There are a number of bug reports in the archive that were automatically
generated by a program named deb-check. Is this program still around?
I would like to look at it.
Thanks,
Richard Braakman
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will also never feel comfortable with an automatic process editing my
lilo.config file. I am set up to boot several linux partitions as well as
a dos partition and a loop-root system. I am much happier editing that
beast myself thankyou ;-)
Dale, I
Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seem you haven't read ssh's man page propperly... Use 'ssh-agent bash' (
or whatever shell you are using, tcsh, yuck.. :) then use 'ssh-add' which
will then tell each ssh/scp client your passphrase...
Or if you use X, just put:
exec ssh-agent
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rxvt 2.4.5 was announced on New Year's Day. As the current hamm package of
rxvt is still 2.20, it would be great if the new version is available.
There have been many improvements; I notice the difference immediately
when I happen to use 2.20 instead
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
Do we want all packages to include the Section and Priority fields?
Probably.
If so, then I think it is far more effective to change dpkg's default
behaviour so that it does include these fields, rather than requiring
an explicit flag -isp.
Hi,
just recently I installed gnuchess-book and gnuchess.
I used something like 'dpkg -i gnuchess-book_* gnuchess_*'.
When the packages were configured I got the message: 'note the
disappearence of gnuchess-book, which has been completely
replaced'. In fact, there's no sign of gnuchess-book
Yes, I could try that. Can the 600 use color and black ink at the same
time?
yes. It has 2 cartridges: one black and another which has 3 bays.
When I print latex documents containing color images the black is black
and the colors come out just fine.
Also would you mind sending me your gs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, there is a problem with the Gregorian calendar that has to be
dealt with in 2000 years or so (having to do with leap-millenia), but
I figure if it's more than 100 years it's no problem.
I believe that can be handled by making the year 4000 not
On 6 Jan 1998, Rob Browning wrote:
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will also never feel comfortable with an automatic process editing my
lilo.config file. I am set up to boot several linux partitions as well as
a dos partition and a loop-root system. I am much happier editing
Sorry,
For those holding their breath...
I had system problems this weekend. I'll have dwww ready
next weekend.
Cheers,
- Jim
pgpFTRhdIqcvr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
rxvt 2.4.5 was announced on New Year's Day. As the current hamm package of
rxvt is still 2.20, it would be great if the new version is available.
There have been many improvements; I notice the difference immediately
when I happen to use 2.20 instead of the
And thus spake Craig Sanders, on Wed, Jan 07, 1998 at 01:52:06AM +1100:
is there any debian policy on number of file descriptors compiled into the
kernel? (and also in limits.h in libc6-dev - AFAIK pretty much everything
that uses select() will need to be recompiled if the limit is increased).
Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If these copyright issues are still relevant - you will find the email
of the xvt author about changing the copyright to gpl in the kdebase
copyright file (because kdebase include kvt, and this way xvt code).
The new upstream maintainers must be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler) writes:
When I use 'dpkg -i gnuchess_* gnuchess-book_*' (ie. in an alternate
sequence) this doesn't happen.
I found, that this is caused by a divertion in gnuchess-book.
1) Should there really be a diversion here?
Probably not. I'll take a
Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know, however it would allow people to much more easily install and
maintain their own kernel sources for these includes.
Surely if they're clever enough for that, they're clever enough to
override a Recommends (not a Suggests) heading. Maybe that
Am 05.01.98 schrieb leutloff # sundancer.oche.de ...
Moin Christian!
CL * cgiparse binary (from CERN httpd)
CL isn't it better to use the correct Recommends/Depends flag instead of
CL doubling the binaries.
Because most people use the Apache server and I'm not sure if you can
install
Am 05.01.98 schrieb schwarz # monet.m.isar.de ...
Moin Christian!
CS think, we should use this help system in Debian 2.0. Some other
CS distributions already use such systems (for example SuSE).
CS You should probably not refer to SUSE here. They are know for their quick
CS and _dirty_
Am 05.01.98 schrieb meskes # topsystem.de ...
Moin Michael!
MM It seems communicator 4.0 doesn't like it at all. As soon as I click on
MM the debian link netscape gets a bus error.
The index.html files are all in HTML 3.2 that's no problem :). But there's
one know bug in dhelp :(. The last
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco Budde) writes:
Am 05.01.98 schrieb leutloff # sundancer.oche.de ...
Btw.: Shouldn't we switch the priority for bug to a higher one,
i.e. standard or essential!? It's a small but very useful program
that
Definitely not essential. It by no means matches the
Hello,
I ran across something very cool the other day -- Webmin
(http://www.webmin.com/webmin/). It's a web-based system management
tool, which is capable of doing things like cron jobs and DNS administration.
The developer has a version for Debian, and I think it would make a great
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see why not? Simply take the debian diffs and apply them against
*today's* kernel and you are off and running. The kernel file organization
hasn't changed in ages. (I hope that doesn't mean that someone will change
it simply because it is old and
Am 05.01.98 schrieb meskes # topsystem.de ...
Moin Michael!
MM It seems communicator 4.0 doesn't like it at all. As soon as I click on
MM the debian link netscape gets a bus error.
I've found the bug (missing fclose). I'll upload 0.2.2 tomorrow.
--
Uni: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fido:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
There are a number of bug reports in the archive that were automatically
generated by a program named deb-check. Is this program still around?
I would like to look at it.
its a tcl script i wrote once.
all functionality is also in deblint and debmake.
On 6 Jan, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabrizio Polacco) wrote:
On 6 Jan, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
So, the people on debs.fuller should make sure
that the version numbers they use will not be taken by 'official' .deb
packages.
This sounds nonsense.
It's the only option
On 6 Jan, Kai Henningsen wrote:
Remember that the last calendar reform was made at an actual difference of
about 10 days (and some countries took a long time after that to implement
it, thus increasing the difference even more), so I'd expect people won't
touch that until the
It's OK to package it if you can get the license straight, but I think it
makes sense for us to base our system-management strategy on COAS (see
http://www.coas.org/) .
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
And thus spake Craig Sanders, on Wed, Jan 07, 1998 at 01:52:06AM +1100:
is there any debian policy on number of file descriptors compiled into the
kernel? (and also in limits.h in libc6-dev - AFAIK pretty much everything
that uses select() will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Schwarz) wrote on 06.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(b) We set up a certain directory (say /usr/lib/cronjobs) where each
package can install its own crontab file (/usr/lib/cronjobs/foo).
Use /etc/cron.often (or similar name). It will contain crontabs, not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Mitchell) wrote on 06.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Mitchell) wrote on 06.01.98 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale Scheetz) wrote on 06.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
Do we want all packages to include the Section and Priority fields?
Probably.
I tend to do it like this:
* don't include them in the first version of the package
* see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale Scheetz) wrote on 06.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6 Jan 1998, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale Scheetz) wrote on 05.01.98 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
I think that /usr/src should the be domain of the local
On Tue, Jan 6 1998 12:18 +0100 Meskes, Michael writes:
I'm not sure about uniprint but the stcolor driver usage in magicfilter
is outdated, i.e. it uses options no longer avalaible in gs-aladin.
Sigh. gs-alladin is in non-free, so magicfilter can't use it.
David
--
David Frey
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 04:11:57PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I think it does gain something; it is much easier to have multiple
versions around. If I compile a new 2.1 kernel and find that
it is not too good (like 2.1.76 seems to have broken
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 11:42:52AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
When I try a new kernel and it doesn't work, I only have to edit
lilo.config an run lilo to get back to the old one (actually I always
leave hooks in lilo to get back to the old kernel). No package
installation is required.
I
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 04:27:53PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Because sometimes the jobs need to run as root. Quite often I suspect.
My package ipac (which started this) needs to run ipfwadm to configure
and reset the IP accounting rules,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
And thus spake Craig Sanders, on Wed, Jan 07, 1998 at 01:52:06AM +1100:
is there any debian policy on number of file descriptors compiled into the
kernel? (and also in limits.h in
On 7 Jan 1998, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
And thus spake Craig Sanders, on Wed, Jan 07, 1998 at 01:52:06AM +1100:
is there any debian policy on number of file descriptors
99 matches
Mail list logo
