On Tue, 5 May 1998, Carlos Barros wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 1998, Anand Kumria wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote:
There doesn't seem to be a reliable method for determining whether or
not you are in an xterm. Any method so far suggested has natural
configuration
On 5 May 1998, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
I have a package that uses two very small libraries, shhmsg and shhopt.
I packaged the libs separately from the program that uses them, but it
has been suggested that I just incorporate them in the package that
uses them (snake4).
The libs are
On Tue, 5 May 1998, Johnie Ingram wrote:
This software has served the #debian channel for over 9 months, and is GPL.
From the README:
Eggdrop is an IRC bot, written in C. If you don't know what IRC is,
this is probably not whatever you're looking for! Eggdrop, being a
bot,
Ok... I can't seem to find a linux PGP program -- commercial, shareware,
freeware, open source, GPL, anything... can any one point me in the right
direction
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++ E? W+++$
On Tue, 5 May 1998, The Gecko wrote:
Ok... I can't seem to find a linux PGP program -- commercial, shareware,
freeware, open source, GPL, anything... can any one point me in the right
direction
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/debian-faq-5.html#ss5.11
The Gecko wrote:
Ok... I can't seem to find a linux PGP program -- commercial, shareware,
freeware, open source, GPL, anything... can any one point me in the right
direction
There is a list of sites that contain Debian files where to get
pgp and such programs located at:
Volunteers are needed for October's ALS. I already have several possible
people that can man the booth. We need people around, or close to the
Atlanta area to be able to help man the booth (bring your screamer box,
etc.) and also less obvious donations. Redhat will be there with its
ubiquitious
This is a great idea.Sysadmins can't keep up with the needs of
an experienced user.
I am almost sure dpkg won't do this now. There will be all sorts
of problems with locations of files. To make sure every package
supports this would add complexity and burden.
We
--On Tue, May 5, 1998 5:52 pm -0700 G John Lapeyre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a great idea.Sysadmins can't keep up with the needs of
an experienced user.
I am almost sure dpkg won't do this now. There will be all sorts
of problems with locations of files. To make
--On Wed, May 6, 1998 1:45 am +0200 Remco Blaakmeer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 1998, Carlos Barros wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 1998, Anand Kumria wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote:
There doesn't seem to be a reliable method for determining
whether or
not
On Tue, 5 May 1998, Joost Kooij wrote:
I love the staus display too. It is a bit jumpy though, maybe you want
to printf the numbers etc. in a fixed-size field. Oh, and an expected TOA
per package would be a nice finishing touch (I'm getting carried away I
guess ;-).
I was thinking of right
On Tue, May 05, 1998 at 08:25:44PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have squid cache
i have dpkg-http
there was a time, when it worked. i could do [U]pdate in dselect, and he
used the version of Packages.gz in the Cache.
i can check that he uses the cache, because if i stop the cache, he
Apt downloads all the packages and then installs them. Every RH
and Debian network method I've seen does this. Is there a way to download
a package, install it and throw the deb away, to save disk space ?
If I wait too long between upgrades, I run into big problems.
On Tue, 5 May 1998, G John Lapeyre wrote:
Apt downloads all the packages and then installs them. Every RH
and Debian network method I've seen does this. Is there a way to download
a package, install it and throw the deb away, to save disk space ?
If I wait too long between
Bob Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trying to upgrade via FTP to hamm would be too painfull at 28.8KB!
Hi,
It depends on your pain threshold, I guess. I thought that too,
until I started the bo testihng program a little over a year ago.
Since then I have
Hi,
I also experimented with a veruy wide xterm, and doscovered
that apt truncates the status line ;-( (I personally would not mind
a wrapped line, or a long line, so I know what is going on rather
than 'Waiting to coneect to blah.blah.blah.blah
(122.122.122.122)'. Not that I am
Hi,
I guess we shold also remove rm. That program can be downright
nasty in the hands of the uninitiated. What about mkfs? oh, man, the
kind of damage _that_ does. Oh, you say that that can only harm the
local machine? Well, we should take away all the MTA's then (is spam
not 80% of
On 5 May 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I also experimented with a veruy wide xterm, and doscovered
that apt truncates the status line ;-( (I personally would not mind
a wrapped line, or a long line, so I know what is going on rather
than 'Waiting to coneect to blah.blah.blah.blah
Hi!
I am at Atlanta and a potential developer. I am willing to man the booth
Please let me know !!!
Thanks,
Vaidhy
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 5 18:49:48 1998
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.novare.net [205.229.104.6]) by
mail.wwdg.com
This is GPL'd, the package is nearly finished.
Description:
SAML is a C library for symbolic calculations, accompanied
by some application programs (samuel, factorint, induce),
and Python bindings.
The library provides an object-oriented framework for
On 5 May 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
I guess we shold also remove rm. That program can be downright
nasty in the hands of the uninitiated. What about mkfs? oh, man, the
kind of damage _that_ does. Oh, you say that that can only harm the
local machine? Well, we should take
On Tue, 5 May 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 1998 at 04:48:28PM +0300, Carlos Barros wrote:
What about trying to connext to X server, and if an error, do it in
terminal mode.
Which would result in opening X connections when working on the
console. No, that's not
I have compiled a version of APT for rex/bo. It was built on my 486 that
runs some strange rex/bo mix and should work on every system from 1.2
onwards.
For completeness I built up a matching version for hamm.
http://www.debian.org/~jgg/apt_0.0.pre9-0.1_i386.deb
On 5 May 1998, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
I have a package that uses two very small libraries, shhmsg and shhopt.
I packaged the libs separately from the program that uses them, but it
has been suggested that I just incorporate them in the package that
uses them (snake4).
The libs
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
This version of apt is probably the most effective way to upgrade from
bo/rex. It has been tested in several bo upgrades and has undergone
simulated upgrades for 18 different configurations, including a few rex
systems.
This makes me wonder if we should think about
On Tue, 5 May 1998, Joey Hess wrote:
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
This version of apt is probably the most effective way to upgrade from
bo/rex. It has been tested in several bo upgrades and has undergone
simulated upgrades for 18 different configurations, including a few rex
systems.
26 matches
Mail list logo
