libwxx-gtk 2.1

1999-09-17 Thread Christian Surchi
Does a package of these libs exists? --- Christian Surchi| Debian GNU/Linux User [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.debian.org www.firenze.linux.it/~csurchi | Linux, the choice of a GNU generation

Re: Too many kernels in unstable

1999-09-17 Thread Brian Mays
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In another thread, I am dealing with exactly this problem. My machine hangs with 2.0.37 and 2.2.x, but is OK with 2.0.36. But had to take a piece of driver code from 2.0.37. There are quite a few new issues arising from two gcc branches and two

Re: aterm packages ?

1999-09-17 Thread Alexander Koch
On Wed, 15 September 1999 22:30:03 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: Didn't somebody ITP aterm? What's the status on that? Samuel Hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] did package aterm (after sending an ITP). He asked me to upload his package since he is not a maintainer yet. However, there were

Re: Announcing debconf, configuration management for debian

1999-09-17 Thread Joey Hess
Have you looked at debconf at all? Because.. Scott Barker wrote: 1) Separate interactive and non-interactive installation scripts. I suggest that the current debian install scripts should contain *only* non-interative functionality, such as running ldconfig, update-rc.d, etc. *All*

Re: Announcing debconf, configuration management for debian

1999-09-17 Thread Joey Hess
Daniel Burrows wrote: I've got a question about this. If you use the --frontend=Base approach, is there any way to mark which packages were installed in this way? No. Though I can see adding it. I'd personally like to be able to do this but also to go back later and fix up configuration

RE: libwxx-gtk 2.1

1999-09-17 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 17-Sep-99 Christian Surchi wrote: Does a package of these libs exists? I was supposed to be taking them over. However I am stretched a wee thin at the moment. So, if you or someone else would like to help, feel free. The one requirement being that wxPython also needs to be cleaned up at

Re: Move proftpd to contrib

1999-09-17 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* Joel == Joel Klecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joel People on linux-security-audit *have* said that about proftpd, Joel and that was said before the most recent security hole was Joel discovered. Rather proving them right, wouldn't you say? Well, not really a prove in scientific way. I forsee

Re: ProFTPd being lame

1999-09-17 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 17, J.H.M. Dassen Ray\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Speaking of FTP servers, has anyone taken a good look at troll-ftpd (ftp://ftp.troll.no/freebies/ftpd)? I did. IMO it's still unsuitable for big servers (it lacks features like site exec and a log analyzer) and it does not look designed for

<    1   2