This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
the bugs that were fixed by uploads I installed today.
I will start removing these packages soon (unless they're too important,
in which case we have a
Hi Raphael,
- information about the NMU policy that the maintainer has adopted
(timeframe before a NMU is allowed, do i need an authorization to do a
nmu ?, ...)
easy to add. Jason would be the person to do this (add a field to the db).
The web interface can easily be changed to
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:46:23 -0300
From: Rodrigo Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Bash and Letter E
Hello
Sorry for asking again about my problem but I can't make my
letter E work in bash (neither in console nor
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 21:50:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Nils Jeppe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: stuffit expander?
Hello,
Is there any debian package (or in fact Unix tool at all) that allows
uncompression of Mac .sit (stuffit) archives?
I think you want the
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 18:55:21 -0300
From: Rodrigo Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bash and Letter E
Hello,
[...]
INPUTRC
--
[...]
\e[C:forward-char
\e[D:backward-char
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:39:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:03:27AM -, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
The base package doesn't exist any more for quite a long time, those first
time Debian user are most of them quite good and knows what to do to
correct
dpkg-divert --package base-files --divert-to /dev.base/hda /dev/hda
Ugh.. ugly...
The clean solution is to truncate the file list of base, as proposed. This
will release all the files owned by that package safely, with no danger at
all.
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:37:27PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
Is it really just bash that has this problem? You tested other shells, but
I don't think they use GNU readline. What about other things that
use readline, like octave (find something smaller if you don't have it
installed
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:50:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
Hello,
Is there any debian package (or in fact Unix tool at all) that allows
uncompression of Mac .sit (stuffit) archives?
there is no debian package, and more to the point there is no *nix
utility period that will extract stuffit
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:54:50PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 21:50:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Nils Jeppe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: stuffit expander?
Hello,
Is there any debian package (or in fact Unix tool at all) that allows
Just found iptables for 2.4.X kernels (for packet filtering, NAT etc) and
packaged it up. Its in incoming.
Sorry for the missing ITP. Will remove it if someone has somethin better.
Hello!
First, I'm proud of Debian!
I upgraded my Debian system to Potato this weekend, and everything went
really fine! Enven my glibc 2.0.7 programs ran (almost all)!
Thank you all developers! Go ahead! Make the world better!
Second, I'm a bit confused about one point:
I compiled gnome,
Anyone using mod_rewrite w/ a dbm map type with this package in potato?
basically whevener i use a map type of dbm rweriting fails to look up the
key value pairs, works ok with text and regexp based rulesets but not dbm.
If anyone else is experiencing this same sort of difficulty then perhaps a
Le Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 06:02:43PM -0700, Randolph Chung écrivait:
Hi Raphael,
Hi,
easy to add. Jason would be the person to do this (add a field to the db).
The web interface can easily be changed to update/view this info.
That's what I thought. :)
the problem with this is that many
... But, since there are pretty current versions of
gnome in potato you might use those...
Surely it woulb be _very_good_ idea, along with communicator and a
really _huge_ stuff I have in, but I really afraid about messing my
system with broken dependencies and so... Ok, removing almos all the
* Joseph Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000326 16:45]:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
Given every report I've heard to the contrary, I'm not sure I believe
that. I've also been told that there are cases where their tests produce
false positives.
I don't
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 02:50:43AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have an IDE ZIP drive? I believe I had the same problem starting
No.
around 2.3.43. The problem is related to having an uninitialized ATA ZIP
Yes, that's when it started.
drive around(on the same chain, maybe) as
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
check that you don't mount devfs, and have IDE subsystem compiled in (it
changed location).
DEVFS is enabled but not mounted. After all the problem occurs way to early
for a mount call. And yes, IDE is compiled in. The system can read
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 08:58:11AM +0200 , Michael Meskes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
check that you don't mount devfs, and have IDE subsystem compiled in (it
changed location).
DEVFS is enabled but not mounted. After all the problem occurs way to
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:35:02AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
e2fscheck always tells me it cannot read the superblock. Up to 2.3.4? it
worked well. And of course 2.2.14 runs without a problem.
Sounds like you may have turned on support for devfs.
You might want to turn that off until debian
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:05:40AM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
* Note, once a site is listed in one of these RBLs it becomes impossible
for a user to unsubscribe from our lists - no matter what they do they
will never be able to communicate a bounce
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Thomas R. Shemanske wrote:
A few days ago, I posted this to the debian-users list, but got no
takers.
Perhaps someone here has some ideas.
OK, if noone else replied I'll give it a trial. Consider me as a
fool with the fortune to get a running UPS daemon and not as an
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:57:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Enable gpm support (except in vim-tiny of course) on popular request.
can this be disabled in ~/.vimrc?
The opposite is infact true, console mouse support has to be enabled in the
Taupter wrote:
I was poking update-alternatives, but didn't find a way to point my
default window manager to /usr/local/bin/gnome-session.
Yes I did read the man 8 update-alternatives, but it was a bit confusing
to me (as I think it is a bit confusing to anyone but the man writer aka
Ian
reopen 32888
reassign 32888 base-files
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:03:27AM -, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
The base package doesn't exist any more for quite a long time, those first
time Debian user are most of them quite good and knows
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes I know, I should probably extract all the identities from a single
PGP/GPG key and look for all those adresses in the Packages file. Or
something like that.
Hmm, /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg lists 278 identities,
while the Maintainer
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
The only reason not to trust a key dinstall uses explicitly for signing
Packages is if you believe dinstall is compromised. If you believe that,
then you shouldn't be downloading .deb's *ever*, because you're immediately
running *untrusted* scripts
Hi,
[ please keep me on the Cc:, I'm not on -devel atm ]
this is driving me nuts. moonlight segfaults on start up if libGL.so
is utah-glx's instead of regular mesa's. I have recompiled the
bloody thing against utah-glx's libGL.so (it was using some Mesa
extension that utah-glx doesn't
Taupter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was poking update-alternatives, but didn't find a way to point my
default window manager to /usr/local/bin/gnome-session.
FWIW, gnome-session is not a window manager. If you're sure you want
to do that, you could issue:
update-alternatives --install
Taupter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Does Debian install any stuff inside /usr/local ?
That would be a bug. You can make sure with dpkg -S /usr/local (or
dlocate /usr/local if you have the dlocate package)
2. Is secure to the system integrity to _wipe_ /usr/local (no
daemons/services stored
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 10:40:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hey people ! I posted this mail in order to have some input ... it would
be great if some of you gave their opinion about this proposition I posted
a while ago :
I guess the silent majority overwhelmingly agrees to your proposal
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer écrivait:
Hmm, /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg lists 278 identities,
while the Maintainer fields in my available file lists 543 separate
values.
$ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.pgp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
It is rumored that on 26-Mar-2000 Nils Jeppe wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Mark Brown wrote:
ORBS also blacklist sites for other reasons, such as if their probes are
firewalled out. This will, for example, catch sites that automatically
firewall out sites
Surely the solution is simple include deb for (X,Apache,Kernel -
NEWSTUFF) as we currently doing for php4 its not installed by default..
but can easily be selected for people having problem with new stuff
with a potato 2.2rx coming out in month or so after would making it
stabled and included in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
It is rumored that on 26-Mar-2000 Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 02:41:09AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
The domain's technical contact.
Ideally, yes. In practice, I'd say that's no more likely to work
than [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen NIC
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:33:39PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/x-window-manager \
x-window-manager /usr/local/bin/gnome-session 90 \
--slave /usr/share/man/man1/x-window-manager.1.gz \
x-window-manager.1.gz path-to-gnome-session-manpage
(if
MoiN
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:14:06PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
dpkg-divert --package base-files --divert-to /dev.base/hda /dev/hda
Ugh.. ugly...
The clean solution is to truncate the file list of base, as proposed. This
will release all the files owned by that package
This is one of the reasons why I've been happy I bought a Smart-UPS, not only
does it provide more information(ammount of battery power and UPS load as well
as other information), but the apcd package for APC monitoring worked
on it out of the box for slink.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Bihlmeyer) wrote:
Taupter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes I did read the man 8 update-alternatives, but it was a bit confusing
to me (as I think it is a bit confusing to anyone but the man writer aka
Ian Jackson), since it was not sufficiently explanatory (at least to
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:15:50AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
base-files will truncate base.list if it exists and will tell the user to
read README.base to remove this package safely (doing it automatically
would be an ugly hack).
Thanks, that sounds like an excellent solution.
Hamish
--
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:17:47PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
The only reason not to trust a key dinstall uses explicitly for signing
Packages is if you believe dinstall is compromised. If you believe that,
then you shouldn't be downloading
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 03:25:51PM +0200, Ingo Saitz wrote:
But this will only work as long as the internal format of dpkg's
database won't change. But I heard it will definitely be changed
in the future. So how will you deal with this change?
Worry about it when it happens.
Hamish
--
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 01:42:47AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
There is no need to check all of [the packages]
Well, it'd be nice to be able to do so, to verify that a mirror hasn't
been compromised, but no, you're right.
Actually, now I think about it, the Packages file itself is valuable
Dear Friends
I am working on debconf support for libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap.
Since both share some common information (ldap-server and ldap-base-dn)
I want to have a shared debconf entry (say shared/ldapns/ldap-server,base-dn).
I tryed adding this to the template and config file of both
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
the bugs that were fixed by uploads I installed today.
I will start removing these
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:35:30PM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
the bugs that were
On 24-Mar-00, 03:15 (CST), BugScan reporter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: nvi (debian/main)
Maintainer: Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
61035 nvi munches database dump
Fixed and in potato.
--
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I
[cc'd to -devel in case anyone else was wondering :-]
Hi
Yeah, the current packages in the distro are getting rather out of date.
I've totally redone the packaging for them so I can now build packages
easily from the wxWin cvs but probably wont upload them to the archive
until wxWin2.2 is
Package: fetchmailconf (debian/main).
Maintainer: Paul Haggart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
57287 generates wrong config files
[ Removing fetchmailconf means also removing fetchmail, unless someone
uploads a fetchmail version that does not create a fetchmailconf package ]
I fixed this one! It was
Correction to my previous mail:
The bug itself can be closed - fetchmailconfig generates working
config files now (the ssl options are gone away).
The only problem now (as now is version 5.3.3) is that fetchmailconf
cannot read its own files a second time :-(
I would suggest *not* to remove it
Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
I have spent the last 3 hours attempting to reproduce this with no
success. I have tried it both with and without
Richard == Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Richard Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
emacs19/20, and
Michael Vogt wrote:
I am working on debconf support for libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap.
Since both share some common information (ldap-server and ldap-base-dn)
I want to have a shared debconf entry (say shared/ldapns/ldap-server,base-dn).
I tryed adding this to the template and config file of
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:55:49AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
emacs19/20, and even the basic package continues to work for XEmacs
(for VM users, for example). Only the interface between bbdb and gnus
in _one_ of the flavours
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 02:48:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 06:05:43PM +0400, Konstantin Kivi wrote:
I also had to add
Set_LCDClk 40
to the Device section. Be aware that parse-xf86config
used in /etc/init.d/xdm doesn't unserstand it
Be aware that
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard == Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Richard Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
This should not be a RC
Previously Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
FWIW, gnome-session is not a window manager.
But it starts one for you, so it would be a good candidate for an
x-window-manager alias imho.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature -
Hello,
I just subscribed, and I'd like to let the list know I'm (hopefully) going to
be working on a couple of new packages, namely tinydns/dnscache by djb, which
is a replacement for BIND, and djb's daemontools, (which is required for
running tinydns).
If you are interested in reading about
Package: debianutils (debian/main).
Maintainer: Guy Maor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59121 run-parts hangs during /etc/cron.daily runs
There's a patch in the BTS. Does someone want to do an NMU or should I?
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jordi Mallach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Haha! Pleaase let's call it my.debian.org, *grin*.
Now, something like this would be really useful.
that's exactly the name i was going to suggest. has the author decided on a
language to tame this beast in? if php, i'd love to help.
--
(jacob kuntz)
Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
Instead of removing this package, couldn't we just change the Depends:
to emacs20 | xemacs21 ?
--
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://web.verbum.org/levanti
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:14:57PM +0200, Christian Hammers écrivait:
Package: fetchmailconf (debian/main).
Maintainer: Paul Haggart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
57287 generates wrong config files
[ Removing fetchmailconf means also removing fetchmail, unless someone
uploads a fetchmail
Nils Jeppe wrote:
ORBS blocks all open relays. A lot of people have open relays. Since open
relays still do not have any reason for existence other than admin
ignorance, the correct way here would be to block all open relays and
then fix the mail servers. ORBS really cuts down on spam, the
Someone should package AIDE (http://www.cs.tut.fi/~rammer/aide.html). It's
a free tripwire replacement.
--
see shy jo
Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:55:49AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
emacs19/20, and even the basic package continues to work for XEmacs
(for VM users, for example). Only the interface
You have to change all lists commands in your ~/.muttrc in
subscribe.
--
ciao,
Marco
Bdale == Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bdale Some folks at work saw similar weirdness with the
Bdale negotiation on some HP switch products, their solution was
Bdale to configure the switch to not do the auto discovery
Bdale protocol, but instead have each port on the
Le 2000-03-26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :
read(0, g, 1) = 1
^^^
It waits for another key. I typed g here
write(2, \7, 1) = 1
^
Hum. It looks like someone here is behaving as though the Control
key was held down.
How long does it take to get your gpg key updated via
this e-mail address?
Hello,
need to spell check it, but i guess it might be helpfull anyway:
aptitude
(c) Copyright 2000, Bernd Eckenfels, Germany
aptitude is a front-end to apt and dpkg, the Debian GNU/Linux Package
Management tools. It tries to provide a nice user interface to every-day
package management on
70 matches
Mail list logo
