Report about packages that need work for Apr 5, 2002
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 45
Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 2
Total number of orphaned packages: 123
Number of packages orphaned this week: 15
The number in parenthesis after each package name is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 03:16:05 +0900
Source: zblast
Binary: zblast-svgalib zblast-data zblast-x11
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.2.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 08:21:36 +0200
Source: beep
Binary: beep
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:16:57 +1000
Source: fpm
Binary: fpm
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.53-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k (bruno) buildd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 22:07:56 +0900
Source: pdl
Binary: pdl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1:2.3.2-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 20:42:30 -0500
Source: heroes
Binary: heroes-ggi heroes-sdl heroes-common
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.21-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:06:47 +0100
Source: snmpkit
Binary: libsnmpkit1 libsnmpkit-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrea
HTML
HEAD
TITLE/TITLE
/HEAD
BODY
DIV/DIV
/BODY
/HTML
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTML
HEAD
TITLE/TITLE
/HEAD
BODY
DIV/DIV
/BODY
/HTML
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:10:49 +0900
Source: evolution
Binary: libcamel-dev evolution libcamel0 evolution-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k (bruno) buildd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTML
HEAD
META content=text/html; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 http-equiv=Content-Type
STYLE p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}/STYLE
/HEADBODY
DIV align=left
DL
DTFONT face=±¼¸² color=black size=2¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. nbsp;º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù./FONT
DTFONT face=±¼¸²
HTML
HEAD
META content=text/html; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 http-equiv=Content-Type
STYLE p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}/STYLE
/HEADBODY
DIV align=left
DL
DTFONT face=±¼¸² color=black size=2¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. nbsp;º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù./FONT
DTFONT face=±¼¸²
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 01:53:34 -0300
Source: devhelp
Binary: libdevhelp-dev libdevhelp0 devhelp
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.3-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 01:55:18 +0900
Source: pango1.0
Binary: libpango1.0-common libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-dev libpango1.0-doc
libpango1.0-dbg libpango-common
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:06:47 +0100
Source: snmpkit
Binary: libsnmpkit1 libsnmpkit-dev
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:53:33 +0200
Source: gtkmathview
Binary: libgtkmathview0 libgtkmathview-dev libgtkmathview-bin
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.3.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 16:22:58 +0200
Source: lablgl
Binary: liblablgl-ocaml-dev liblablgl-ocaml
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.97-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 10:12:18 +1000
Source: glut
Binary: glut-doc glutg3-dev glutg3
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.7-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jamie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:55:56 +0900
Source: imagemagick
Binary: libmagick++5 imagemagick libmagick5-dev libmagick5 perlmagick
libmagick++5-dev
Architecture: sparc
Version: 4:5.4.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 10:39:09 +0200
Source: qm
Binary: qmtest qm-extclass qm
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:32:46 -0500
Source: scribus
Binary: scribus-doc-de scribus-doc-fr scribus-doc-en scribus
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.5.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:36:17 +0200
Source: mdadm
Binary: mdadm
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.7.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mario Joussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 02:55:29 -0500
Source: discover
Binary: libdiscover-dev libdiscover1 discover
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 03:20:15 +0900
Source: xlhtml
Binary: ppthtml xlhtml
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.4.9.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Keita Maehara [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 00:43:13 -0700
Source: amanda
Binary: amanda-client amanda-server amanda-common
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:2.4.2p2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 09:29:01 -0300
Source: wprint
Binary: wprint
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.04-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Eduardo Trapani [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 06:03:33 -0500
Source: powermgmt-base
Binary: powermgmt-base
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Hood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:25:49 +0200
Source: bison
Binary: bison
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:1.35-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Vincent Renardias [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:12:56 +0900
Source: libbonoboui
Binary: libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-dev libbonoboui2-common
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.113.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 04:53:54 +0900
Source: gail
Binary: libgail11 libgail-common libgail-dev libgail-dbg
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:38:12 -0500
Source: iptables
Binary: iptables-dev iptables
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.2.6a-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Laurence J.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:24:17 -0500
Source: gdb
Binary: gdb
Architecture: sparc
Version: 5.2.cvs20020401-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:12:50 +0200
Source: ucl
Binary: libucl-dev libucl0
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.01-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 10:33:49 -0500
Source: ncbi-tools6
Binary: ncbi-data ncbi-tools6 ncbi-tools6-dbg vibrant-dev vibrant6
ncbi-tools-bin blast2 vibrant6-dbg ncbi-tools6-dev ncbi-tools-x11
Architecture: sparc
Version: 6.1.20011220a-1
HTML
HEAD
META content=text/html; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 http-equiv=Content-Type
STYLE p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}/STYLE
/HEADBODY
DIV align=left
DL
DTFONT face=±¼¸² color=black size=2¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. nbsp;º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù./FONT
DTFONT face=±¼¸²
HTML
HEAD
META content=text/html; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 http-equiv=Content-Type
STYLE p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}/STYLE
/HEADBODY
DIV align=left
DL
DTFONT face=±¼¸² color=black size=2¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. nbsp;º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù./FONT
DTFONT face=±¼¸²
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:22:00AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
It's because of this that I continue to feel that kernel interfaces are
best defined by the kernel.
If the kernel headers aren't an interface, why do they exist? There
appears to be a very large philosophical gulf here.
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: konq-speaker
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : George Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org/~grrussel/speaker.html
* License : GPL and LGPL
Description
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:56:42PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:56:06PM -0600, Michael Janssen wrote:
I prefer this way too, but would rather the extension be the shorter
-quiet, which is much easier to remember and more standard than
-nonverbose. We could
Previously Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
And that flag is?
None right not, but putting flags in mail headers scales a bit better
than putting flags in email addresses. One can automate it with mutt
for example (send-hook bugs.debian.org my_hdr X-Debbug-Flags: skipack).
Wichert.
--
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 07:38:28PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we need a better way to specify flags. Especially
because now we've got to worry about which comes first (or does
it matter)?
But then we need a way for these flags to be easily propagated to
Hi,
NMUers please incorporate translated debconf templates send to the BTS
(unless they break package building, of course). Due to Debconf design,
these files are quite harmless and thus could be incorporated into NMU.
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 05:59, Branden Robinson wrote:
If the kernel revs in such a way as to break
ioctl numbers, there's no userland way around it, is there?
No. On the other hand, this virtually never happens. The kernel people
are usually quite disciplined about not making changes that
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 02:19:37AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
-quiet doesn't even mail the maintainer, unlike -maintonly - it's mostly
intended for use by maintainers dropping comments into their own bugs.
At the moment it still sends an ack though.
Of course, most of the maintainers using it
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is more out there than just i386 system. I would love to see
you attach a 100 gigabyte disk to a m68k system.
Looking at several m68k's here, they have SCSI-2 connectors. Wouldn't
it be feasible to connect an IDE-RAID system to them?
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 04:03:27PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 13:38, Rob Bradford wrote:
Ooh nice, maybe you could integrate with apt-spy or something to find
the fastest for the user?
I don't see why not, though I'd be more inclined to add pin support
first. I had
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 07:38:56PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
Aptconf will allow users to configure sources.list via debconf. It
will also contain a configlet for setting up sources.list via the
GNOME Control Center, in druids, and potentially other settings.
Ooh nice, maybe you could
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 04:32:09PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
This was prompted by the GCC GNATS system, which has dozens of PRs created
by these ACKs.
The GCC GNATS maintainer has contacted us already about it and a solution
will definitely be worked out...
(patches welcome as always)
From the 6th to the 15th April I'll be in Pembrokeshire.
Specifically I shall be in Llandewi Velfrey for the week, with
a couple of trips to St Davids and Haverfordwest planned.
If there's anyone fancying a key-signing in the area, I will have car and
mobile phone, so email me and I'll give you
Why debmake still remains in the distribution if it's replaced by
dh_make?
The question is because I discovered that the script I used to create
all the 90 debian packages I maintain (not in the Debian dist, it's in
the software house I work for) are built incorrectly, because I used a
script
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Why debmake still remains in the distribution if it's replaced by
dh_make?
Because it's not. debhelper is not a drop-in replacement for debmake.
If people use it and someone is willing to maintain it, it will continue
to exist in the distribution, as it happens with every
On 04 Apr 2002 08:27:05 -0300
Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why debmake still remains in the distribution if it's replaced by
dh_make?
Because many packages still depend on it.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Is there any reason to keep jvim in the archive? As far as I know
the current vim package should not have any problem handling
Japanese so if possible I'ld like to have jvim removed.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This
retitle 138659 RFP: gil -- GTK ISDN Launcher
reassign wnpp
thanks
On Sat 16 Mar 2002, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
I would like to see gil in this package:
http://home.fr.inter.net/jfonde/gil-page.html
It is the only good gtk/gnome app for ISDN.
It is probably better to request that this be added
Hi,
At Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:54:43 +0200,
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Is there any reason to keep jvim in the archive? As far as I know
the current vim package should not have any problem handling
Japanese so if possible I'ld like to have jvim removed.
jvim-canna can input Japanese without
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We do not revoke keys because they are not invalid. We do not revoke the
signatures on UIDs mentioning @debian.org, because that would cause a lot
of
trouble for the person to come back to the Debian project, I think. One
cannot
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:05:13PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 04:03:27PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 13:38, Rob Bradford wrote:
Ooh nice, maybe you could integrate with apt-spy or something to find
the fastest for the user?
I don't see
Because it's not. debhelper is not a drop-in replacement for debmake.
But the question is... shouldn't it be?
Em Qui, 2002-04-04 às 08:50, Santiago Vila escreveu:
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Why debmake still remains in the distribution if it's replaced by
dh_make?
Because it's not. debhelper
Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because it's not. debhelper is not a drop-in replacement for debmake.
But the question is... shouldn't it be?
NO! debmake was deeply flawed in its interface and implementation,
and were debhelper to be a drop-in replacement it would always be
fighting
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:42:28PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Santiago Vila wrote:
Because it's not. debhelper is not a drop-in replacement for debmake.
But the question is... shouldn't it be?
They have different design goals. Apart from anything else, debstd is
monolithic while debhelper
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:37:52AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
About the only thing you can do is to discontinue use of the kernel
headers altogether and provide your own, unconditional, definitions
(with different names if there is any danger that the kernel's version
of them might become
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 20:34, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:37:52AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
About the only thing you can do is to discontinue use of the kernel
headers altogether and provide your own, unconditional, definitions
(with different names if there is any
also sprach Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.04.04.0211 +0200]:
because it will prevent s.d.o from serving a buggy package. it's not
fixed perfectly, but at least it's not subject to a known exploit.
Could you be a little more careful with your terms? A DOS is not an
exploit, it's a
also sprach Andrew Pimlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.04.04.0135 +0200]:
this problem is understood by the developers of proftpd
Wichert said that nobody has explained why the current fix on s.d.o
doesn't work. If the problem is understood, why hasn't someone
explained this? That's all that
Hi.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:49:44PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
On 04 Apr 2002 08:27:05 -0300
Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why debmake still remains in the distribution if it's replaced by
dh_make?
Because many packages still depend on it.
Are there any statistics
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 21:08:11 +0200,
Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any statistics somewhere, how many packages use debmake,
how many use debhelper and how many use something completely different?
$ grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends debmake Sources | egrep '^Package' | wc
92 184
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 09:08:11PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:49:44PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
On 04 Apr 2002 08:27:05 -0300
Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why debmake still remains in the distribution if it's replaced by
dh_make?
Because many
So, who wants to add support to apt-spy for querying BGP routing tables?
When I worked for Adero, that was *hard* information to get. However,
that inspires the thought of another approach: Akamai (the far more
successful vendor in that space) already builds pictures of the net
from BGP and
I'm no longer on this list, but was looking over the web archives.
Anyhow, just FYI: the GCC folks have had to block [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
sending to the GCC bug-reporting addresses because of this auto-ack problem.
What apparently has been happening is that a Debian developer will forward
a
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 17:44, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
It's simple, just stick a flag in the mail headers.
I don't really regard that as a reasonable solution. For example, my
email client doesn't (as far as I know) allow adding arbitrary headers
to a message. I suppose you could argue that my
Package: gs-common
Severity: serious
Hi *,
I am filing this bug/writing this mail because there is a big problem
in the gs packages in woody which needs fixing before release. I would
like to get comments on the changes I want to implement.
Currently I maintain the following set of
will do, sorry. a DOS is still a form of exploit - you exploit
One way to clarify your thinking about this: to repair a DOS problem,
you simply need to fix the effected service (with a big hammer, like
apt-get remove or an ip firewall entry, or with more subtle tools
like fixing the bug and
dpkg -s package
This doesn't show the package description!
O. Wyss
--
Author of Debian partial mirror synch script
(http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To minimize possible conflicts with other names it creates man pages in
section 6 (games!). Of course this can be configured in the config file.
I'd rather like to know which is a better place for it.
Use a subsection. For instance, somepackage(1dsc) goes in
Is it better than `apt-cache show foo` ?
No if you are a power user, otherwise yes. Beside not everbody has
apt-cache installed.
O. Wyss
--
Author of Debian partial mirror synch script
(http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
dpkg -s package
This doesn't show the package description!
O. Wyss
To show the description of one package use this command:
dpkg -p package
[]'s
Henrique
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:55:22PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
This means forking from XFree86 upstream in a way that I'm not entirely
comfortable with. Is there anyone around who is familiar with DRM
innards who would be willing to work with me and upstream to get this
fix implemented in
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 11:03:52PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
Is it better than `apt-cache show foo` ?
No if you are a power user, otherwise yes. Beside not everbody has
apt-cache installed.
I think most people do have apt installed.
$ dpkg -S `which apt-get` `which apt-cache`
apt:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:36:58AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
Are there any statistics somewhere, how many packages use debmake,
how many use debhelper and how many use something completely different?
$ grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends debmake Sources | egrep '^Package' | wc
92 184
This one time, at band camp, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 17:44, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
It's simple, just stick a flag in the mail headers.
I don't really regard that as a reasonable solution. For example, my
email client doesn't (as far as I know) allow adding arbitrary headers
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 08:50:26AM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
It's simple, just stick a flag in the mail headers.
I don't really regard that as a reasonable solution. For example, my
email client doesn't (as far as I know) allow adding arbitrary headers
to a message. I suppose you
Hello,
I have configured mutt -y so it returns a list of a number of
Maildirs, and noticed something strange in performance.
When I first turn on my computer, then scrolling through the list is
nice and fast, but after I leave the computer on for 12 hours or more,
it slows down considerably, and
html
head
DEFANGED_meta http-equiv=Content-Language content=en-us
DEFANGED_meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
charset=windows-1252
DEFANGED_meta name=GENERATOR content=Microsoft FrontPage 4.0
DEFANGED_meta name=ProgId content=FrontPage.Editor.Document
titleInvestors/title
/head
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:30:09PM -0500, Mark Eichin wrote:
I wonder what it would cost to just have Akamai support our mirrors
Way more than we've got. :)
--
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
html
head
titleUntitled Document/title
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=euc-kr
link rel=stylesheet href=http://www.chazri.net/2000/coupon/mail-1/css1.css;
type=text/css
link rel=stylesheet href=http://www.chazri.net/2000/coupon/mail-1/cc2.css;
type=text/css
/head
script
html
head
titleUntitled Document/title
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=euc-kr
link rel=stylesheet href=http://www.chazri.net/2000/coupon/mail-1/css1.css;
type=text/css
link rel=stylesheet href=http://www.chazri.net/2000/coupon/mail-1/cc2.css;
type=text/css
/head
script
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:17:34AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
At one stage, I thought it might be related to the speed of my LDAP
server (the problem goes away if I remove it from nsswitch.conf),
however, I can't see any evidence that the LDAP server
(localhost) is slowing down.
Perhaps it is
Oohara Yuuma [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Are there any statistics somewhere, how many packages use debmake,
how many use debhelper and how many use something completely different?
$ grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends debmake Sources | egrep '^Package' | wc
92 1841519
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Because it's not. debhelper is not a drop-in replacement for debmake.
But the question is... shouldn't it be?
debhelper used to include a dh_debstd that did more or less the same
thing as debstd. After a few years I noticed that noone had ever used
it, and removed it.
--
Because it's not. debhelper is not a drop-in replacement for debmake.
If people use it and someone is willing to maintain it, it will continue
to exist in the distribution, as it happens with every other package.
I think that if you survey the set of packages that comtinjue to use
debstd,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 10:19:41 +0900
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oohara Yuuma [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Are there any statistics somewhere, how many packages use debmake,
how many use debhelper and how many use something completely different?
$ grep-dctrl -F
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:05:28AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Perhaps it is just a dcache problem. Perhaps you can see anything in
/proc/slabinfo or you could try to run find first? Could be that memory is
What do the columns in slabinfo mean?
filled up and therefore the cache for the
On Wed Apr 03, 2002 at 10:03:24AM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote:
Looks like it doesn't matter anymore. I've been removed as the new
maitnainer by erik due to the 2 week delay.
Once again, I apologize for the delay on the package but it couldn't be
helped. Hopefully I can assist on some
HTML
HEAD
META content=text/html; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 http-equiv=Content-Type
STYLE p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}/STYLE
/HEADBODY
DIV align=left
DL
DTFONT face=±¼¸² color=black size=2¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. nbsp;º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù./FONT
DTFONT face=±¼¸²
HTML
HEAD
META content=text/html; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 http-equiv=Content-Type
STYLE p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}/STYLE
/HEADBODY
DIV align=left
DL
DTFONT face=±¼¸² color=black size=2¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. nbsp;º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù./FONT
DTFONT face=±¼¸²
HTML
HEAD
META content=text/html; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 http-equiv=Content-Type
STYLE p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}/STYLE
/HEADBODY
DIV align=left
DL
DTFONT face=±¼¸² color=black size=2¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. nbsp;º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù./FONT
DTFONT face=±¼¸²
HTML
HEAD
META content=text/html; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 http-equiv=Content-Type
STYLE p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}/STYLE
/HEADBODY
DIV align=left
DL
DTFONT face=±¼¸² color=black size=2¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. nbsp;º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù./FONT
DTFONT face=±¼¸²
retitle 82597 O: green-card -- A foreign function interface preprocessor for
Haskell
thanks
If there is nobody who'll take this package, I'll ask for its removal
from the distribution. (It does not compile from source currently
so I can't just orphan it in the normal way.)
You have one week to
Ing. Salvador Fernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Es un prototipo que estamos lanzando aqu? en M?xico utilizando el
c?digo inicial del kernel para construir el logo.
Tanto como me pueda gustar la idea, preferiría no se usasen referencias
directas a Linux pues no quiero ser yo quien
On jue, abr 04, 2002 at 09:47:48 +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Tanto como me pueda gustar la idea, preferiría no se usasen referencias
directas a Linux pues no quiero ser yo quien enfrente la muy
justificada ira de Marcus en la próxima feria...
Yo me adhiero a tu propuesta Marcelo,
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo