Re: Rant about the flaming here

Hi Jeroen, On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:42:51PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > I'm getting sick of people who can't read. Let's say the same thing > for the next time. Maybe a lot of people on this list just need > glasses, so I do it in upper case that you can easily read it: I have yet to see

Re: upload rejected: md5sum for .orig.tar.gz doesn't match .dsc

On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote: > Your package upload (cl-imho, manpages-de, tiger) was rejected due to a > mismatch in the original source md5sum. I saw this in > auric:/org/ftp.debian.org/incoming/REJECT/*.reason . The package I > maintain (lire) was rejected for

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > s/refused/discouraged/ and I would agree. Isn't the goal of Debian > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free > software anymore? IMHO the "we support non-free software" clause was I think this is one of the g

upload rejected: md5sum for .orig.tar.gz doesn't match .dsc

Hi, Your package upload (cl-imho, manpages-de, tiger) was rejected due to a mismatch in the original source md5sum. I saw this in auric:/org/ftp.debian.org/incoming/REJECT/*.reason . The package I maintain (lire) was rejected for the same reason. I have absolutely no idea how this was caused, o

Re: Debian's problems, Debian's future

On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 17:25, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > What you are suggesting is that the server store checksums for precalculated > blocks on the server. This would be 4 bytes per 1k in the original file or > so. The transaction proceeds as follows: > > 1. Client asks for checksum list off

Re: Debian's problems, Debian's future

On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:25:22AM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:02:34PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: > > you propose to add 'some' diff files for all files on ftp-master.d.o? > > > > With rsync we need only one rsync-checksum file per normal file and > > all a

[REQ] rebuild gmetadom, gtkmathview and lablgtkmathview on HPPA

I and the upstream author have fixed the C++ problem that inhibit gmetadom to build on HPPA with g++ 3.0. Could someone then rebuilt gmetadom and two of the packages that depend on it on HPPA? The three packages are the ones of the subject given in the order in which they have to be rebuilt. (The

Re: Please compile treetool for ia64

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tille, Andreas) writes: > Could any kind soul please do the job or just poin to an ia64 box with > installed build dependencies? Done. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please compile treetool for ia64

Hello, it would be nice if treetool could be available for all released architectures. Cureently only ia64 is missing. auric:~> madison treetool treetool |2.0.2-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, powerpc, sparc treetool |2.0.2-2 | testing | source, alpha, arm, i386, m

Re: O: gnu-standards -- GNU coding standards

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:32:16PM -0700, Mark Rafn wrote: > I'm not certain I agree. Point one of the social contract is "Debian Will > Remain 100% Free Software". The obvious reading of this is that anything > that is not free software cannot be in Debian. I tend to doubt that *either* was

Re: Description to man pages

Hello, in general I like the idea of descriptions of manpages. I would like it even more if it would regard i18n descriptions which are produced by the ddtp server. Kind regards Andreas. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

<    1   2