SCO license for Debian distrib

2003-08-06 Thread Georges Roux
Bonsoir, Je ne désre pas lance de troll sur ce forum. J'aimerais pouvoir lire la position de officielle de Debian Au vu de la licence SCO sur les distributions Linux. Licence SCO : http://www.sco.com/scosource/linuxlicensefaq.html un simple lien me suffirait, je ne tiens pas a poluer la doct

Re: SCO license for Debian distrib

2003-08-06 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Licence SCO : http://www.sco.com/scosource/linuxlicensefaq.html En Allemagne, le LinuxTag a fait sommer par la jsutice allemande SCO de fermer sa gueule ou d'avancer des preuves formelles. C'était il y a plusieurs semaines, et ils ont décidé de la fermer. Conclusion : SCO n'a fait que monter un

Re: Bug#202869: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Erik Steffl
Hans Fugal wrote: * Andreas Jellinghaus [Wed, 6 Aug 2003 at 00:27 +0200] mutt can do many nice things without /usr/sbin/sendmail. a dependency is set if something is always required, a recommends if is required for the common use, and a suggestion is used if it improved the functionality. so

The results of your email commands

2003-08-06 Thread Cc-bounces
The results of your email command are provided below. Attached is your original message. - Results: Invalid confirmation string. Note that confirmation strings expire approximately 3 days after the initial subscription request. If your confirmation has expired, please try to re-submit your

Re: libraries being removed from the archive

2003-08-06 Thread Martin Schulze
Richard Braakman wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:08:04AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Hence the need for policy to dictate to the maintainer not to allow the package to be removed before all other packages have transitioned. It usually doesn't take much more work as long as the

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Martin Schulze
Artur R. Czechowski wrote: I've found your bugreport: http://bugs.debian.org/202869 I see no issue to not depending mutt on mail-transfer-agent. Mutt as is, is a software for reading, writing and sending emails. And to provide a full functionality it needs a kind of transfer-agent. I

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Morgon Kanter
This one time, at band camp, Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree. The main functionality of Mutt is to read *and* send mail. Being able to only read mail archives is not the main functionality but a backup functionality. To be able to provide the main functionality, an MTA is

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Nathanael Nerode
bootlogd. Activating swap. fsck 1.35-WIP (01-Aug-2003) Running 0dns-down to make sure resolv.conf is ok...done. Please contribute if you find this software useful. DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 Starting Xprint servers: Xprt. If the

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Alan Shutko | Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Oh, look, someone else who CCs when it is obvious the person they're | responding to is participating right here. | | Maybe you should stop whining and just set the Mail-Copies-To header, | which is generally respected by posters

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Morgon Kanter | This one time, at band camp, Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I agree. The main functionality of Mutt is to read *and* send mail. | Being able to only read mail archives is not the main functionality | but a backup functionality. To be able to provide the main |

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Adam Majer
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:58:17AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: with. The MIA problem is significant enough that NM might be the only way to tackle with it seriously. That means taking time to examine

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h I agree. The main functionality of Mutt is to read *and* send mail. AOL Being able to only read mail archives is not the main functionality but a backup functionality. To be able to provide the main functionality, an MTA is required, hence a dependency. Why not appease

Re: Bug#202869: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Cameron Patrick
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:33:35PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote: | Mutt can read mail without an MTA, but cannot send mail without one. | | it does not have to be on the same machine It does in the specific case of mutt. I seem to recall Mutt's developers deciding to specifically /not/ support

Re: Have Linux boot with eye-candy

2003-08-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 02:38, Erich Schubert wrote: Hi, i have built packages for the bootsplash tools (no package for the patch itself though. just download and apply the diff). They are available on http://people.debian.org/~erich/boot/bootsplash/ and work fine on my notebook as well

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Morgon Kanter | What if the MTA is on a different host? Can't mutt speak SMTP? Not without a patch, which afaik, isn't in the mutt in Debian. I would recommend using that patch, then. IMHO using any local mailer is a bad idea on a desktop system. You send off

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:06:08AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h I agree. The main functionality of Mutt is to read *and* send mail. AOL Being able to only read mail archives is not the main functionality but a backup functionality. To be able to provide the main

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Andreas Barth
* Goswin Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030806 05:35]: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, has anybody done any research into what types of package maintainers tend to go MIA? I would be especially interested in a percentage of old style DD's, DD's who have gone through the NM

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Andreas Metzler | [1] I won't list Gnus but would be really surprised if it _needed_ | /usr/sbin/sendmail ;-) gnus uses /usr/sbin/sendmail by default, but can use smtpmail.el if you want that. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Goswin Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030806 05:35]: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, has anybody done any research into what types of package maintainers tend to go MIA? I would be especially interested in a percentage of old

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:35:29 +0200 Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO using any local mailer is a bad idea on a desktop system. You send off the mail, your MUA says Sent, you power down or just close the laptop, and, if your smarthost happens to be a bit slow today, the mail sits

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Brian May
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:35:29AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: IMHO using any local mailer is a bad idea on a desktop system. You send off the mail, your MUA says Sent, you power down or just close the laptop, and, if your smarthost happens to be a bit slow today, the mail sits there

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Adam Majer | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for | his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to | direct emails about those bugs. I guess I'm MIA, then, since I have an RC bug which is 156 days (or so) old, which is waiting for upstream to

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Colin Watson [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 08:36:25AM]: Why not appease both? Let mutt depend on mail-transport-agent | no-user-mta and tell such MTA hating users to create a fake no-user-mta package with equivs. There's no point; it's just as easy to create a fake package

Re: python 2.2 - python 2.3 transition

2003-08-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:31:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Last weekend, python 2.3 was released. With the next python2.3 upload, python2.3 becomes the default python version. Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages every time python* is mentioned? :P

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Colin Watson wrote: There's no point; it's just as easy to create a fake package that provides mail-transport-agent with equivs. I wouldn't even think about that; it's too easy to forget all about that and then get bitten when you install a package which does require a working

Re: Excessive wait for DAM - something needs to be done

2003-08-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader wrote: In any case, applications will be processed (and some rejected, I'd assume) once db.d.o is up again. Well, it seems to be up now (or at least ping+ssh+ldap'able). I'll leave the obvious-loaded-question-asking to others. This time. ;-) --

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:10:08AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Adam Majer | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for | his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to | direct emails about those bugs. I guess I'm MIA, then, since I have an RC

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:15:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 21:38:19 +0200 Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apple has a great way of doing that. They don't dumb down, they don't belittle you, they assume an intelligent being who can grasp reasonably

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Andreas Barth
* Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030806 11:20]: * Adam Majer | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for | his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to | direct emails about those bugs. I guess I'm MIA, then, since I have an RC bug which is

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent? [Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:26:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Joe Average User would most probably be pissed if he installed mutt but doesn't have an MTA and then tries to send mail. That would take us back

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Matthew Palmer | On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:10:08AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | * Adam Majer | | | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for | | his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to | | direct emails about those bugs. | | I guess

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Adam Majer | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for | his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to | direct emails about those bugs. I guess I'm MIA, then, since I have an RC bug which is 156 days

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Goswin Brederlow | Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | * Adam Majer | | | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for | | his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to | | direct emails about those bugs. | | I guess I'm MIA, then,

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030806 07:57]: I agree. The main functionality of Mutt is to read *and* send mail. Being able to only read mail archives is not the main functionality but a backup functionality. To be able to provide the main functionality, an MTA is required, hence a

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:06:53PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Emile van Bergen | Hi, | | On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:19:53AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote: | | And I would scream if you called it /_My_ Variable Data/ too... :-P | | I would even scream at | | /Variable Data/

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 6.08.03 um 13:04:41 schrieb Emile van Bergen: Tab completion or using /Va* is about as fast as /var. I've considered tab-completion and /Va*, but you must realise that they work only in the shell. Neither tab-completion or globbing is available when I'm editing a file and have to write

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:34:49 +0200 Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 6.08.03 um 13:04:41 schrieb Emile van Bergen: Neither tab-completion or globbing is available when I'm editing a file and have to write those path names. In Vim insert mode, press ^X^F for completion, ^N/^P to

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:10:03 +0200 Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If mutt spoke SMTP, it would be a MTA itself. (Perhaps still missing the proper interface to link /usr/lib/sendmail to mutt, but that would be the lesser part). No, it would not. It would be using another method

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Keith Dunwoody
Michael Piefel wrote: Am 6.08.03 um 13:04:41 schrieb Emile van Bergen: Tab completion or using /Va* is about as fast as /var. I've considered tab-completion and /Va*, but you must realise that they work only in the shell. Neither tab-completion or globbing is available when I'm editing a file and

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:06:53PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Emile van Bergen | Hi, | | On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:19:53AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote: | | And I would scream if you called it /_My_ Variable Data/ too... :-P | |

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 05, Artur R. Czechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not convinced to only Recommend on mail-transfer-agent. I rather tend to closing this wishitem or tag it as wontfix. I'm inclined to close this bug. I agree with the submitter that a local MTA is not strictly needed to use mutt, but

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:52:37AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Colin Watson [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 08:36:25AM]: Why not appease both? Let mutt depend on mail-transport-agent | no-user-mta and tell such MTA hating users to create a fake no-user-mta package with

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Emile van Bergen wrote: I would even scream at /Variable Data/ simply because it encourages slow and RSI-inducing click and drag behaviour /VaTAB isn't too bad, typing-wise, especially if you also have a case-insensitive file system. Apple's OS X translates the pathnames in the GUI

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:56:59AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: I know of several DDs and non-DDs thinking about creating a Debian2 (or whatever named) project due to this and other lack of responce problems and the group is growing. The danger is already there and should not be ignored.

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030806 13:43]: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:10:03 +0200 Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If mutt spoke SMTP, it would be a MTA itself. (Perhaps still missing the proper interface to link /usr/lib/sendmail to mutt, but that would be the lesser part).

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Greenland
On 06-Aug-03, 02:06 (CDT), Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not appease both? Let mutt depend on mail-transport-agent | no-user-mta Or better, Depends: ssmtp | mail-transport-agent That way, if you don't have an MTA already, it will select a simple get mail to a real MTA package,

Re: python 2.2 - python 2.3 transition

2003-08-06 Thread Domenico Andreoli
hmmm.. just curious... why? On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:18:53AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:31:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Last weekend, python 2.3 was released. With the next python2.3 upload, python2.3 becomes the default python version. Am I the only one

howto use chroot on merulo?

2003-08-06 Thread Domenico Andreoli
hi, i need to build curl on ia64 to see why it fails the test phase. i'm thinking to use merulo, the only machine which provides chroots (i suppose) to compile stuff for sarge, but i never used chroots on project machines. any hint? i gave a glance to the developer reference but i didn't find

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:41:20 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:56:59AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: I know of several DDs and non-DDs thinking about creating a Debian2 (or whatever named) project due to this and other lack of responce problems and the

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Andreas Barth
* Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030806 14:50]: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:56:59AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: I know of several DDs and non-DDs thinking about creating a Debian2 (or whatever named) project due to this and other lack of responce problems and the group is growing.

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:56:34PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:41:20 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:56:59AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: I know of several DDs and non-DDs thinking about creating a Debian2 (or whatever named)

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:33:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030806 14:50]: Why is this a danger? This is one of the freedoms provided by free software, which we work hard to promote. Because it would be a waste of work, time and energy. Not if

About NM and Next Release

2003-08-06 Thread Halil Demirezen
I am currently on NM process. And as far as I know, there have been totally over 700 developer of Debian officially. What I would like to point out here is, totally over the world claims that debian is being obsolete. New releases are so slow. Yes they are partially right. However, with 700

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:07:40 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not if the projects have different goals. If the goal is the same only the process to that goal is broken then it is a waste of time and effort. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink,

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Jesus Climent
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:01:51AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: Depends: ssmtp | mail-transport-agent That way, if you don't have an MTA already, it will select a simple get mail to a real MTA package, whose configuration will ask where's your real MTA? Doesn't policy state that a

Re: howto use chroot on merulo?

2003-08-06 Thread Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:23:39PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: hi, i need to build curl on ia64 to see why it fails the test phase. i'm thinking to use merulo, the only machine which provides chroots (i suppose) to compile stuff for sarge, but i never used chroots on project machines.

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:51:12PM +1000, Brian May wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:35:29AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: IMHO using any local mailer is a bad idea on a desktop system. You send off the mail, your MUA says Sent, you power down or just close the laptop, and, if your

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:14:00AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:07:40 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not if the projects have different goals. If the goal is the same only the process to that goal is broken then it is a waste of time and effort. I

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Steve Greenland [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 08:01:51AM]: Why not appease both? Let mutt depend on mail-transport-agent | no-user-mta Or better, Depends: ssmtp | mail-transport-agent Where is the point? OP did already know how to manage dependencies, he can install ssmtp if

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Steve Langasek [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 07:37:16AM]: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:52:37AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Colin Watson [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 08:36:25AM]: Why not appease both? Let mutt depend on mail-transport-agent | no-user-mta and

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Peter Makholm
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:07:40 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not if the projects have different goals. If the goal is the same only the process to that goal is broken then it is a waste of time and effort. Not if a new projects succedes

Re: python 2.2 - python 2.3 transition

2003-08-06 Thread Chad Walstrom
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:18:53AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages every time python* is mentioned? :P On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: hmmm.. just curious... why? The short of it: he's

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:03:07PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: * Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030806 13:43]: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:10:03 +0200 Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If mutt spoke SMTP, it would be a MTA itself. (Perhaps still missing the proper interface to

Re: About NM and Next Release

2003-08-06 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
I'm not commenting on the rest of the message but this: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:29:54PM +0300, Halil Demirezen wrote: What I would like to point out here is, totally over the world claims that debian is being obsolete. New releases are so slow. Yes they are Debian is dying. Linux is dying.

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:30:11 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see your name on http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php. What part of the process are you claiming is broken? I wasn't aware my name had to be on the list to recognize that some have been there for years. --

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:27:10 -0500 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And is a much better choice than expecting every user to locally configure smtp settings in the MUA. Lack of direct-SMTP support in mutt is a good thing. Yeah because entering smtp.isp.com is just so trying for most

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Bernhard R. Link [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 03:03:07PM]: * Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030806 13:43]: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:10:03 +0200 Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If mutt spoke SMTP, it would be a MTA itself. (Perhaps still missing the proper interface to

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Steve Langasek [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 07:37:16AM]: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:52:37AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Colin Watson [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 08:36:25AM]: Why not appease both? Let

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Greenland
On 06-Aug-03, 09:18 (CDT), Jesus Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:01:51AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: Depends: ssmtp | mail-transport-agent That way, if you don't have an MTA already, it will select a simple get mail to a real MTA package, whose

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: Or perhaps the poster should know the policy on Debian lists which is _not_ to Cc unless explicitly requested. Noted. I was unaware of this, having not seen any mention of this policy when I subscribed. My apologies for any inconvenience caused. --

Re: About NM and Next Release

2003-08-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Halil Demirezen [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 05:29:54PM]: We believe we could be helpful. However, We are trying to be cut off What makes you believe this? Many people helped Debian development on critical points like boot-floppies and debian-installer development _without_ beeing a DD

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
I do not need CCs. I am obviously active on the list. On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 23:28:52 +0800 Cameron Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:04:00AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: It is if they have to dig up what the correct SMTP server is. Or if they're on a laptop whose

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:17:24AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Martin Schulze is also the Press Contact, so I certainly hope he has good communication skills! /me goes and yanks Joey's chain some more :o) -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Bernhard R. Link [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 03:03:07PM]: * Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030806 13:43]: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:10:03 +0200 Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If mutt spoke SMTP, it

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:44:11AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: If he doesn't want to, the DPL should really do something. Such as...? I think he's saying that the DPL should 'delegate his DAM power' to somebody else. The DAMs are after all officially appointed by the DPL...

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:03:11PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: with. The MIA problem is significant enough that NM might be the only way to tackle with it seriously. That means taking time to examine applications. BTW, has anybody done any research into what types of package

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:36:10PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: Totally true. That's e.g. the reason why announcing the removal of old RFPs didn't appear in debian-devel-announce where it would have belonged - the submission was rejected by the moderators for the formal reason I'm not a

Re: About NM and Next Release

2003-08-06 Thread Glenn McGrath
Debians greatest strength is in its community, that includes dd's and non dd's. If we are organised in such a way that we are alienating non dd's the we are operating in a diminished state. Debian is but a shadow of what it could be. Glenn

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:31:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: I didn't know that only DD could post on d-d-a. But to be honest, I would have expected that one of the list managers would adopt my message without much words if it is ok to post. As this didn't happen, I interpreted it so

Re: python 2.2 - python 2.3 transition

2003-08-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:33:26AM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote: Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages every time python* is mentioned? :P hmmm.. just curious... why? The short of it: he's joking. Note the smiley. Even though package names that

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Joe Average User would most probably be pissed if he installed mutt but doesn't have an MTA and then tries to send mail. That would take us back into the old days of Slackware. Joe Average User has to follow the recommendation, since he doesn't know the details. If he decides to do things

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030806 17:04]: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:03:07PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: * Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030806 13:43]: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:10:03 +0200 Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If mutt spoke SMTP, it would be a MTA

Re: Should this be filed as grave? Gcc-2.95

2003-08-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: I don't take kindly to software installing other software without a clear need and there simply was no clear need. Well, now, why don'tcha run 'em outta town, Tex? (IMO, the kernel ignoring $(CC) is the kernel's problem.) -- G.

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 21:38:19 +0200, Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You know, I think these are actually good suggestions. I think there's a lot to be gained *not* by dumbing down, *not* by losing any information that might be useful to a geek or to a new user as (s)he's learning, but

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Brian Kimball
Eduard Bloch wrote: It is allowing _few_ users to work around a dependency which makes sence for everybody else, but is not really useful for _those_ few users in their special environment. What few users? What special environment? Can anyone provide a real world example of a

Re: About NM and Next Release

2003-08-06 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:29:54PM +0300, Halil Demirezen wrote: Debian Maintainers are becoming too elite. However, outside world becoming more excluded. And Debian finally is becoming so obsolete. Everybody has an opinion on this matter. I don't usually even bother posting mine, but here

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Jon Dowland
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:55:59AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote: I receieved the machine with Debian preinstalled and no offline documentation except a post it note with the root username and password. On other systems (Mac OS X, Windows XP, etc) I am clearly shown where to look for more

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Hans Fugal
I don't pretend to know what is best for all users, but as a fairly ordinary mutt user I can tell you that I would be unhappy to find out that Debian patched mutt to do SMTP just so they could have a warm fuzzy feeling about the depends. I like mutt the way it is: no SMTP. New mutt users might be

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Steve Lamb | How many local users are you going to have on a laptop whose correct SMTP | server changes as a function of their location? Usually: one, I guess. | Oddly enough I only have one program for that now. Sylpheed-Claws. | Fortunately it can do something that most SMTP

Re: How to install X-Chat in five hours (or more)

2003-08-06 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Ian Hickson | On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | | Or perhaps the poster should know the policy on Debian lists which is | _not_ to Cc unless explicitly requested. | | Noted. I was unaware of this, having not seen any mention of this policy | when I subscribed.

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:01:55AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:30:11 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see your name on http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php. What part of the process are you claiming is broken? I wasn't aware my name had to be on

Re: Should this be filed as grave? Gcc-2.95

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:26:12 -0500 Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (IMO, the kernel ignoring $(CC) is the kernel's problem.) One problem doesn't excuse the other. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Adam Majer
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:40:21PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Adam Majer | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for | his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to | direct emails about those

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Steve Langasek [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 10:10:06AM]: You tell me. Why is it so important to *prevent* the installation of an MTA on such a machine when installing mutt? 99% of our users are going to want to send outgoing mail from their mailreader. A package that contains

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 10:48:29 -0600 Hans Fugal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New mutt users might be slightly confused by the mutt way of doing things but that doesn't mean we have to patch mutt for their sakes. Naturally, it's up to the package maintainer how to differ from upstream, but this mutt

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This one time, at band camp, Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree. The main functionality of Mutt is to read *and* send mail. Being able to only read mail archives is not the main functionality but a backup functionality. To be able to

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:50:21 +0200 Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Steve Lamb | How many local users are you going to have on a laptop whose correct SMTP| server changes as a function of their location? Usually: one, I guess. So 1 person, 1 location to change. |

Re: Should this be filed as grave? Gcc-2.95

2003-08-06 Thread Adam Heath
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: (IMO, the kernel ignoring $(CC) is the kernel's problem.) Don't you know your O doesn't matter, only Steve's?

Re: NM non-process

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:56:20 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:01:55AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:30:11 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see your name on http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php. What part of the

Re: About NM and Next Release

2003-08-06 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:10:24PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: Interessting analysis. Many things that hold up the release can only be solved by active and experienced maintainers since the packages are often essential. New developers can help maintaining them in cooperation with main developer

  1   2   3   >