* Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 17:14]:
> It seems that the Debian gltron maintainer, Gregory J. Oschwald, has
> been MIA for at least a year now. I can't find him anywhere in the
> developers DB, and haven't seen any recent mail activity at all on
> either bugs or mailing lists. I'd l
David B Harris wrote:
As much as you may dislike it, people care about toolkit. I don't
understand the witch-hunt to remove references to such things.
Short description is a limited resource. By all means, put GTK or GNOME
in the long description if it is deemed necessary; apt searches will
still
尊敬的新老朋友: 您好!
★ 您想有效的争取尽可能多的赚钱机会吗？
★ 您想拥有大量的潜在客户名单吗？
★ 您想在信息时代中步步抢占先机吗？
◆不管您是企业还是个人，邮件营销是您最好的选择！！！
◆邮件广告是一项成本低见效快的广告方式！！！
◆电子邮件广告与传统的媒体广告相比，具有被注意率高、价格便宜、受众面高、速度快、效率高等优势，非常适合低成本发布产品和业务信息或推广网站.
◆邮件营销让你在家享受赚大钱的喜悦，Come
On，让我们在21世纪用网络赚钱吧，轻松赚钱，机不可失哦！！！
★★★由本人用了两个多月的时间，历尽千辛万苦收集到了2003年国内最新的邮件地址32
Talking about udev, I have a preliminary package here:
http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/ .
BTW, I may have been missing something as I did not read the beginning
of this thread, but I don't see the point of packaging sysfsutils: as
it's part of the udev source package (which I ITP'ed some weeks ago)
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 11:41:45PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> >> * Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031012 20:25]:
> >> > Second hint: If you insist on your right to forge your email address,
> >> > anyone else can forge yo
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:32:39PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And if I'm a german living in america?
> Then you'd go to the normal alphabetical listing just
> as you would have to now
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Riku Voipio
> > Second hint: If you insist on your right to forge your email address,
> > anyone else can forge your address as well. Is that a right you really
> > need?
>
> Uhm, how would you forge your own mail address? It's like forging
> your own signature, somethi
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's about forging an e-mail sender's identity. By preventing the
> > unauthorized use of domains as the sender domain of e-mails, most of
> > the practiced cases of identity forgery are prevented. [...]
>
> If I send an e-mail
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:01:57PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Well, if we came upon the problem independently we might have fixed
> it. But I don't know if we did, because I have no idea what the
> problem is. I have a vague memory of some problems with line
> numbering under -traditional, but
* Riku Voipio
I have mail-followup-set for a reason. In addition, it is normal
policy on Debian lists not to Cc people unless explicitly requested.
| > I think it's a silly proposal, since it will hinder people like me who
| > are sending all their mail from a laptop to send their mail properly
Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Bernhard, please excuse the accidental CC!)
> Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>> * Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031012 20:25]:
>> > Second hint: If you insist on your right to forge your email address,
>> > anyone else can forge your address as well. Is that
[ Please CC me on replies ]
It seems that the Debian gltron maintainer, Gregory J. Oschwald, has
been MIA for at least a year now. I can't find him anywhere in
the developers DB, and haven't seen any recent mail activity at
all on either bugs or mailing lists. I'd like to hijack this
package if I
(Andreas, please excuse the accidental CC!)
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Convince the owner of these domains that you are (that is, your
> > outgoing mail server is) allowed to send mail "from these domains".
>
> Think "these domains" = debian.org and "out
(Bernhard, please excuse the accidental CC!)
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031012 20:25]:
> > Second hint: If you insist on your right to forge your email address,
> > anyone else can forge your address as well. Is that a right you really
> > need?
>
> It's about to
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 21:53:10 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The critical line is:
>
> FILE *yyin = {stdin}, *yyout = {stdout};
Replace that with
FILE *yyin, *yyout;
... in main() ...
yyin = stdin;
yyout = stdout;
> wnlex.c:75: error: initializer element is not cons
Hi,
I seem to have a transition problem in a package of mine:
The critical line is:
FILE *yyin = {stdin}, *yyout = {stdout};
In the first line of the file in question
#include
is included. The error is.
gcc -I/usr/include -O -DUNIX -c -o wnlex.o wnlex.c
wnlex.c:75: error: initia
* Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031012 20:25]:
> Second hint: If you insist on your right to forge your email address,
> anyone else can forge your address as well. Is that a right you really
> need?
It's about to *use* an e-mail address, not about forging one...
> Third hint: You can still c
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:59:25 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:38:17PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> >
> > > My god, that was awful. They still haven't fixed cpp -traditional, as
> > > far as I know. Grumble grumble grumble.
> >
> > Bug number?
>
> Mumble mumble mumbl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openoffice.org-help-cs
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Pavel Janik et al. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cs.openoffice.org/
* License : LGPL
Description : OpenOffice.org office suite help (Czech)
OpenO
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:03:45PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Joel Baker
> | Last I checked, this was (unfortunately) not yet an RFC, but only a draft
> | proposal. It happens to be one I really like the idea of, but I am aware
> | of more or less 'nobody' implementing it, nor any significa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just got the following messages replacing syslog by syslog-ng from dselect
(Woody).
Should this be reported as a bug? Against which package (syslog, syslog-ng,
apt)?
The problems are:
- - messages regarding klogd and anacron are incorrect as syslo
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
> >What can I do? Ask the buildd admins to add more swap? I would be
> > happy to cross-compile the packages (they don't require any arch-specific
> > bootstrapping) but I don't have enough hard drive space to build a cross-
> > compiler.
>
> Whatabout r
Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> And it does not help in the first szenario at all
>> (unless you think it to be ok that user a receives the bounces for
>> user b).
Just for a reminder: Two people using different domains with a changing
smarthost on one computer.
> If yo
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And if I'm a german living in america?
Then you'd go to the normal alphabetical listing just
as you would have to now, while 99% of the users in
that TZ had the right language as one of
Hi!
Am 2003-10-12 14:05 +0200 schrieb Eduard Bloch:
> > > _That_ should not happen.
> [...]
> Choosing custom SONAMEs which mach clash with upstream's in the future.
That's why I asked.
> Either ship the static library only or provide SONAMEs that are
> unique in Debian.
That sounds reasonable.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You know, there is a difference between Envelope-From (SMTP MAIL FROM:)
>> and whatever you put in the From: header. They don't have to be the same.
>[...]
>
>I do know
Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:18:46PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
> wrote:
> > > I would suggest adopting a policy for the language order. Of course,
> > > determining the "most important" languages is a very delicate thing as
> > > everyone would li
#include
* Andreas Metzler [Sun, Oct 12 2003, 01:26:31PM]:
> >> necessary) and will probably end up with a debian soname of
> >> libsysfs.so.10 when upstream releases *their* first shared version
> >> with soname libsysfs.so.0.
>
> > _That_ should not happen. See Lib Packaging Guide,
> > http:
Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> SMTP AUTH is no magic solution, you'd have to start routing mail by
>> sender instead of recipient.
>> Take myself, sharing a computer at home with somebody else who
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #include
> * Andreas Metzler [Sun, Oct 12 2003, 10:19:40AM]:
>> If upstream only ships a static library the Debian maintaner will have
>> to take care of versioning the library (pushing the soname when
>> necessary) and will probably end up with a debian
Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
[...]
>> How would you set up so that my laptop (or yours or whoever's) can
>> send mail from about ten different domains if the server you are
>> sending to is using SPF and the domain you are sending from have it
>> implemented in
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>SMTP AUTH is no magic solution, you'd have to start routing mail by
>sender instead of recipient.
>
>Take myself, sharing a computer at home with somebody else who uses a
>completely different domain for her e-mail. Curren
debian-devel
你好：
我们是毕思条码网（WWW.BSEAY.COM)，我们致力于条码资讯平台的建设以关注条码应用和发展，欢迎各位来毕思条码网看看
，欢迎链接，欢迎加入毕思条码论坛。
毕思条码论坛(www.bseay.com/forum.asp)提供给大家一个条码交流的场所，大家可以在论坛中互相交流。毕思条码论坛目标是打造网上最热最火的条码专业论坛
如此邮件给你带来不便，我们在此向您道歉！
毕思条码网
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:32:46PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> may package scripts assume, that they have the fowner capability
> available? many postinst scripts first set the owner of a file/dir and
> try to change the permissions after. this is only allowed with this
> capability set.
If you'
As an alternative to existing similar IMAP servers, Binc IMAP strives to
be very easy to use, but robust, stable and secure. It aims at being
absolutely compliant with the IMAP4rev1 protocol, and simple and modular
in design, making it very easy for third parties to utilize the source
code and
#include
* Andreas Metzler [Sun, Oct 12 2003, 10:19:40AM]:
> If upstream only ships a static library the Debian maintaner will have
> to take care of versioning the library (pushing the soname when
> necessary) and will probably end up with a debian soname of
> libsysfs.so.10 when upstream releas
hi folks
may package scripts assume, that they have the fowner capability
available? many postinst scripts first set the owner of a file/dir and
try to change the permissions after. this is only allowed with this
capability set.
bastian
--
"What terrible way to die."
"There are
#include
* Jochen Voss [Sat, Oct 11 2003, 11:32:33PM]:
> > Also, how do you display the names of the continents so that all of your
> > non-English-speaking users can understand them? :)
> I did not try a fresh install of Debian for a long time. How
> do we display the language names now so that
http://www.567com.com 中国智能自助建站网
建站优惠套餐 660 元起！！
庆国庆，即日起至10月30日，可享受报价9折优惠！
赠送：
1、登陆320个国内著名搜索引擎！
2、向800个相关商务网站提交供求信息！
3、现款现货，中国互动营销网会员资格！
另提供文件下载、网上购物等附加功能！
http://www.567com.com 中国智能自助建站网
功能：
中国智能自助建站系统是一套功能强大的网站自助管理系统！使用本系统，不但可以创建普通企业、个人网站，还可以创建功能丰富的电子商务网站！五分钟学会做网站，三天速成建站高手！免费试用
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:05:11AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
[...]
>> Is it reasonable to provide just a static library? Policy 8.3 allows
>> it in principle, but since I'm not very experienced at this, I would
>> welcome any suggestions and your opinions.
>
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Gerfried Fuchs
> > The concept of SMTP AUTH is completely new to you, is it? Sorry,
> > these kind of objections are just as silly as you call the proposal
> > silly.
>
> Uhm, no, why should it be? Having gnus set up to use SMTP auth and
> using a different server base
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:18:46PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> > I would suggest adopting a policy for the language order. Of course,
> > determining the "most important" languages is a very delicate thing as
> > everyone would like to have his own language listed on the first pa
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On the shared library side, we already have the NEEDED field in ELF libs
> which is more elegant; so the .la's are redundant (and, indeed, can get
> in the way). I understand Scott is working on fixing libtool so that it
> doesn't try to redund
Hi!
Am 2003-10-12 1:44 -0500 schrieb Adam Majer:
> Me too, but I guess I'll have to see how udev looks. How does it look
> like? Will it retain compatability with the devfs device names?
Theoretically yes. The concept of udev was to throw out naming
policies out of the kernel. The userspace daem
* Gerfried Fuchs
(Discussion moved from -private, all text and references which refer
to stuff not ok to quote outside -private removed.)
| * Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-09 22:03]:
|
| > I think it's a silly proposal, since it will hinder people like me who
| > are sending all t
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:05:11AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> Today I read about the upcoming architecture for kernel device files
> [1]. devfs is already marked obsolete (what a pity, I really like
> it...) and will be replaced by an userspace daemon udev.
Me too, but I gue
46 matches
Mail list logo
