On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:10:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
> libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
>
> courier
> cyrus-sasl2
> exim4
> linesrv
> pam-mysql
> postfix
> proftpd
^^^
yet do
Hi,
I invented Macromedia Flash.
I called Macromedia one day and started preaching
the virtues of using vector for sending animation over the web using small
amounts of data. I told them at the time that I fully realized that this was
probably a multi million dollar idea and that I was willin
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
> >Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
> >libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
> I would suggest that libmysqlclient14 should be used if possible. MySQL
> has changed the way passwords are stored in the
Steve Langasek wrote:
>Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
>libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
>
>
I would suggest that libmysqlclient14 should be used if possible. MySQL
has changed the way passwords are stored in the database and this
prevents clients f
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:03:20 +0300
Ivan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you explain what do you mean? Thanks allot
What motherboards call RAID is really a tricky way to make Windows see
and use software RAID. You will probably want to Google about "software
raid" in Linux for more info. I'
Hello, hello, who's your lady friend?
We are glad to present You this online sotfwrae store with maximum lowest
pr1cces on the Internet. You wont find sotfware anywhere else on the Internet
with pr11ces lower than here. All the programs we have here for sale are all
available on our fast storage
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:46:39PM +0200, Guido Heumann wrote:
> Bill Allombert schrieb:
> > Hello Debian developers,
>
> [...]
>
> > Before I do more testing, I would like to make sure I know the proper
> > procedure:
> >
> > 1) What is the recommend way to perform such upgrade ?
>
> I'm not a
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 03:50:37PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Martin Waitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050429 15:40]:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:22:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Why not? removing arm from testing does not change at all the number of
> > > binary arm packages being pushed
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:03:23PM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:09:31PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
> > Moin,
> > bug #279232 is assigned to doc-base, though it is (as to my analysis) a perl
> > problem (see the thread in the BTS). This prevents clean dist-upgrades from
Bill Allombert schrieb:
> Hello Debian developers,
[...]
> Before I do more testing, I would like to make sure I know the proper
> procedure:
>
> 1) What is the recommend way to perform such upgrade ?
I'm not a DD, but the release notes seem to recommend aptitude for upgrades:
http://www.debian
Can you explain what do you mean? Thanks allot
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:04:53PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I am performing semi-automatised woody-to-sarge upgrade of one
> > server and I find the upgrade is more painful than what is necessary.
> >
> > apt-get dist-upgrade
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:31:39AM -0400, Ivan Adams wrote:
> Hi,
> I have Intel865PERLL with ICH5 and I need to make SATA RAID to work. I
> have made the Enhanced Mode in Raid BIOS, but no one (debian) kernel
> didn't saw it property. Even now I am with Knoppix 3.8 and it saw it
> wrong. I have D
Moin,
bug #279232 is assigned to doc-base, though it is (as to my analysis) a perl
problem (see the thread in the BTS). This prevents clean dist-upgrades from
woody to sarge.
what do you think about the solution (using pre-depends and conflicts)?
--
c u
henning
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I am performing semi-automatised woody-to-sarge upgrade of one
> server and I find the upgrade is more painful than what is necessary.
>
> apt-get dist-upgrade try to remove lots of the packages, and doing so
> trigger bugs.
> Can't
Hello Debian developers,
I am performing semi-automatised woody-to-sarge upgrade of one
server and I find the upgrade is more painful than what is necessary.
apt-get dist-upgrade try to remove lots of the packages, and doing so
trigger bugs.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
apache apach
Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hoi :)
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:22:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> Why not? removing arm from testing does not change at all the number of
>> binary arm packages being pushed each day, as the packages between
>> testing and unstable are shared (
Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I need access to a sid chroot on a amd64 system with Build-Depends for
> python-ctypes (libffi2-dev, python, python2.3-dev, python2.4-dev, debhelper)
> to debug Bug#298157. Can someone help? I am not subscribed to debian-amd64,
> so please CC
hello,
i've a problem with packaging python-mysqldb. version 1.2 is already
uploaded to unstable, and has no bugs while version 1.1.6
- currently in testing - has a rc bug: #306906
on the other side python-mysqldb 1.2 lacks python2.2 support, and
thus no python2.2-mysqldb package exists any longe
Christoph Berg schrieb:
> GET YOUR RELEASE OUT NOW!
>
> EVERYTHING YOU NEED IN STOCK!
>
> http://www.df7cb.de/debian/shop/
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: THIS SPAM MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF NUTS.
>
*LOL*
This was by far the most funny "spam" I ever got.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
After rolling out LDAP and upgrading to kernel 2.6.10 we noticed programs were
failing in a manner similar to this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su -
Password:
su: pthread_mutex_lock.c:78: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion
`mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed.
Aborted
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
This o
Hi,
I have Intel865PERLL with ICH5 and I need to make SATA RAID to work. I
have made the Enhanced Mode in Raid BIOS, but no one (debian) kernel
didn't saw it property. Even now I am with Knoppix 3.8 and it saw it
wrong. I have Debian Sid cd1 and Debian Sarge cd1 and Debian Sarge
Netinstall and als
* Martin Waitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050429 15:40]:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:22:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Why not? removing arm from testing does not change at all the number of
> > binary arm packages being pushed each day, as the packages between
> > testing and unstable are shared
hoi :)
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:22:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Why not? removing arm from testing does not change at all the number of
> binary arm packages being pushed each day, as the packages between
> testing and unstable are shared (and only few packages go in via t-p-u).
> So, the
Hi,
I need access to a sid chroot on a amd64 system with Build-Depends for
python-ctypes (libffi2-dev, python, python2.3-dev, python2.4-dev, debhelper)
to debug Bug#298157. Can someone help? I am not subscribed to debian-amd64,
so please CC me any responses. Thanks.
Ganesan
--
Ganesan Rajagopa
GET YOUR RELEASE OUT NOW!
EVERYTHING YOU NEED IN STOCK!
http://www.df7cb.de/debian/shop/
DISCLAIMER: THIS SPAM MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF NUTS.
--
The Debian Release Shop
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Josh Metzler wrote:
How would you know which subscriber was harvesting e-mail addresses?
Josh
If the need ever comes, you can put a fake and distinct CC: address on
each outgoing mail, that will point to a single subscriber.
I would receive the same mail with CC:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you, with
On Friday 29 April 2005 06:50 am, David Mandelberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 03:53 -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > As far as spam harvester are concerned, they can just subscribe to the
> > mailing-lists to get the mail headers.
>
> I think if they subscribe to the mailing list and use it for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Quinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libapache-sessionmanager-perl
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Enrico Sorcinelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/E/EN/ENRYS/Apache-SessionMana
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 03:53 -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> As far as spam harvester are concerned, they can just subscribe to the
> mailing-lists to get the mail headers.
I think if they subscribe to the mailing list and use it for abuse they
can easily be banned, whereas they can't be banned from
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:38:34PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:20 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > It would be really handy to have archives of the debian mailing lists
> > > available as mbox archives.
> >
> > The correct solution, until someone
31 matches
Mail list logo
