Barbe Costas
Same Medication - Low Price
http://sfs.ixltm10tfa084j0.tallddeid.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:00:09AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't personally care on /usr/lib vs. /usr/libexec, except that the idea
of going through and changing all the packages in Debian really doesn't
appeal to me (and however easily
Just a few things to clarify:
With SGE 5.3, the FIFO is the default scheduling
policy. However, you can configure the scheduler to
run in SGE EE (Enterprise Edition) mode, which has the
4 additional scheduling policies (deadline, share
tree, override, and functional). With SGE 6.0, you get
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Most applications I've seen that use libexec make it entirely trivial
to move it to /usr/lib: ./configure --libexecdir=/usr/lib. (I don't
think apps that don't do this, or something like it, should be a major
consideration here--take apps out of the
Le mardi 17 mai 2005 à 23:47 -0700, Ron Chen a écrit :
All of those are opensource (even the EE mode) and can
be downloaded from the SGE homepage:
http://gridengine.sunsource.net
At first glance, this doesn't look DFSG-free.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
Thomas == Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas We've been told that /usr is necessary to allow network
Thomas sharing. Of course, you can network share any directory,
Thomas not just /usr. If you want executables to be shared, then
Thomas share /bin. It's not a
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:14:19AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I'm just not seeing any benefits that are worth bloating /usr.
Wait, are you serious? The bloat of /usr/lib having thousands of
files doesn't bother you, but the two dozen in /usr is bothersome?
Huh? Using libexec
also sprach Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.18.0342 +0200]:
Thanks a lot for your work, and for making Debian a more pleasurable
place for developers!
That sounds like props, not like prods...
Lol. Well, I hope my intentions were clear. Sorry, 't was late.
--
Please do not
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Most packages had files in /usr/doc. Most packages do not have files in
/usr/lib at all, and most of those that do, wouldn't need to be changed.
Changing from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc was a fairly simple and
straightforward change in a whole
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Wait, are you serious? The bloat of /usr/lib having thousands of
files doesn't bother you, but the two dozen in /usr is bothersome?
We dont talk about thousands, on a edium sized system it is a few hundred
directories and up to thousand files/symlinks.
On 18 May 2005, at 8:18 am, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 17 mai 2005 à 23:47 -0700, Ron Chen a écrit :
All of those are opensource (even the EE mode) and can
be downloaded from the SGE homepage:
http://gridengine.sunsource.net
At first glance, this doesn't look DFSG-free.
Indeed not, but it's
Save money on buying software!!!
http://vwe.ncr284ngkx5ck6n.orangeiagce.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your mail was borderline incomprehensible and certainly not worth the
effort it would have required for me to read it. Go and eat a
dictionary.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -- |
Andrew,
I agree that the previous mail was not very easy to read, nor written in a
great english. But I don't think that being fluent in english should be a
requirement to be treated nicely on a development list... You are lucky
enough to have this language as your mother tongue, consider this
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
I agree that the previous mail was not very easy to read, nor written in a
great english. But I don't think that being fluent in english should be a
requirement to be treated nicely on a development list... You are lucky
enough
Le Mercredi 18 Mai 2005 15:48, Andrew Suffield a crit:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
I agree that the previous mail was not very easy to read, nor written in
a great english. But I don't think that being fluent in english should be
a requirement to be
Borojevic Corrine
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:57:12PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
Le Mercredi 18 Mai 2005 15:48, Andrew Suffield a écrit :
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
I agree that the previous mail was not very easy to read, nor written in
a great english. But I don't
Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Wait, are you serious? The bloat of /usr/lib having thousands of
files doesn't bother you, but the two dozen in /usr is bothersome?
We dont talk about thousands, on a edium sized system it is a few hundred
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas == Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas We've been told that /usr is necessary to allow network
Thomas sharing. Of course, you can network share any directory,
Thomas not just /usr. If you want executables to be shared,
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, this is a closed issue until you change the FHS. (Something that
I don't think is very likely to happen, but best of luck to you.)
Since the FHS tries to be responsive to what different distributions
want, this doesn't help in the question:
You would rather have silence than know why you are being ignored?
Then silence you shall have.
Well, its the tone that makes the music we use to say here in Germany.
Certainly there would have been ways to tell Bluefuture that his mail
was hard to read/understand without becoming offensive.
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
You would rather have silence than know why you are being ignored?
Then silence you shall have.
Well, its the tone that makes the music we use to say here in Germany.
Certainly there would have been ways to tell Bluefuture
[Thomas Bushnell BSG]
Um:
/bin/mount foo:whatever /bin
That's a huge administrative hassle. Not only do you have to figure
out what programs and libraries /bin/mount depends on so you can make
sure they're on your real root partition, but the packaging system
doesn't - and shouldn't - do
(please excuse the cross-posting, i felt it was necessary to get all
affected parties' input)
hi,
for some time now, christian and i have been trying to build in a
workaround for a rather tricky bug in the mysql-server and
mysql-server-4.1 packages, and we'd like to field some comments
on what
Change of Email Address
Do the significant increase in the amount of spam email received for this
address, it will no longer be active. The new email address is [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sincerely,
Tamar Zwerdling
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Our generic medications are manufactured on government certified facilities and
meet or exceed the highest US and international Food and Drug Administration
standards.
Its safe for humans!!!
http://www.nebelanga.com/20023/Essence
Man cannot live by incompetence alone.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:36:18PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
You would rather have silence than know why you are being ignored?
Then silence you shall have.
Well, its the tone that makes the music we use to say here
Quoting Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I really don't care. If somebody can't be bothered to write a mail in
comprehensible English, they shouldn't expect anybody else to bother
to read it. Most won't even bother to say why they didn't bother to
read it. He's lucky that I did, and
* Joerg Sommer [Thu, 05 May 2005 20:39:57 +]:
Hi,
in an old version of jed-common two conffiles 00site.sl and 99debian.sl
were included. But caused by some reason they aren't removed on upgrade.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266981
Becomes a conffile held if it was
Quoting sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SNIP
so at this point, we're not sure what to do to cover this last problem,
as we have no guarantee the preinst of mysql-server-4.1 will even run
before mysql-server/woody is removed. the only fix we can think of is
to remove the two directories from the
Is SZALAY Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIA?
His last upload was over three months ago (Feb 10th, 2005) and does
not respond to his emails. I've tried contacting him via his debian
email address with no success (first message sent April 13th, CC'd
co-maintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] who responded; sent a
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:21:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, this is a closed issue until you change the FHS. (Something that
I don't think is very likely to happen, but best of luck to you.)
Since the FHS tries to be responsive to
Hello all,
As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
the binary package being described. This is an inconsistency that makes
it a bit harder to massage this data, e.g. with grep-dctrl.
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:19:50PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
At what point would it be appropriate to begin to actively maintain
syslog-ng?
It's been 'only' a few months since nothing has been heard -- I've added
your hint now to the MIA database for later followup, and will orphan
when no
On Fri, 13 May 2005 23:44:05 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
I've updated the Cogito package to compile against the upstream-included
GPL SHA1 implementation lifted from Mozilla, instead of the (possibly)
GPL-incompatible OpenSSL code. Thanks to Florian Weimer and Anibal
Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:02:30AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
I should mention that I'm still waiting for your benchmark
results on how a drastic reduction in /usr/lib size speeds up the
runtime linker. On *any* filesystem, O(n)-lookups or not.
(In case you missed it, I explained how to
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For people trying this out, Zach Brown wrote some excellent
documentation [1]. It would be nice to see this end up in the debian
packages.
I'm hoping the upstream maintainer (Pasky) will pick up that patch.
If he doesnt in the next several days, I'll
reassign 309669 wnpp
retitle 309669 RFP: kscope -- Source Editing Environment for KDE
thanks
* Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-18 22:40]:
Package: kscope
Severity: wishlist
New wishlist bug.
Please include kscope as a package.
http://kscope.sourceforge.net
Anyone interested?
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
Certainly there would have been ways to tell Bluefuture that his mail
was hard to read/understand without becoming offensive.
No, really, there isn't. It is not possible to send mail to a Debian
mailing list any more without
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:19:50PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
At what point would it be appropriate to begin to actively maintain
syslog-ng?
It's been 'only' a few months since nothing has been heard -- I've added
your hint now to the
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 19:38 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
It's been 'only' a few months since nothing has been heard -- I've added
your hint now to the MIA database for later followup, and will orphan
when no reaction is forthcoming after a number of pings, so that you can
take
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 14:20 +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Hi all!
I'm on the way of making a debian package for Waste, and I would have the
folowing two questions about your software:
Does the licence really reflect GPL?
This arise because of this:
On 5/18/05, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really don't care. If somebody can't be bothered to write a mail in
comprehensible English, they shouldn't expect anybody else to bother
to read it. Most won't even bother to say why they didn't bother to
read it. He's lucky that I did,
Hi!
He is just overworked a bit, just like me.
Trying to do something soon.
Sorry.
--
GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrsbl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
I agree that the previous mail was not very easy to read, nor written in a
great english. But I don't think that being fluent in english
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
I agree that the previous mail was not very easy to read, nor written in a
great english. But
Le Mercredi 18 Mai 2005 18:02, Christian Perrier a écrit :
Quoting Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I really don't care. If somebody can't be bothered to write a mail in
comprehensible English, they shouldn't expect anybody else to bother
to read it. Most won't even bother to say why
It is common for developers to be buried in other work, I know, I
often get this way, it is understandable.
However, it has now been several months and as section 3.4 of the
Developers Reference says: its important ... to let the others know
that you're unavailable. So, I think it is appropriate
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:38:33AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
This just seems like change for the sake of change, with trivial benefits,
if any.
I agree, and I admit to not having read this whole thread, but has anyone
made a serious argument as to why we need yet another directory for
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 06:19:58PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:36:18PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
You would rather have silence than know why you are being ignored?
Then silence you shall
Hello,
(Sorry for just intejecting into the discussion like this, but)
>From what I understand of the history of WASTE. At one time,
NullSoft did infact release WASTE under the GPL. However, AOL
(NullSoft's parent company) didn't like this, and that message on
NullSoft's website is because of
Comme vous le voyez, la cuistrerie, cela se cultive...
Quelle verve :) A en faire pâlir Cyrano de Bergerac ma foi !
La liste est cependant anglophone je pense, et nos pauvres collègues non
Sure. And this list subscribers deserve some apologies for myself
being annoyed enough to be
On 5/18/05, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, well. But he's still right. This once.
Is there some reason why eat a dictionary had to be copied to all of
debian-devel in order to inform bluefuture of his linguistic
difficulties? (I ask this knowing full well that my own pot has
On 5/18/05, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. And this list subscribers deserve some apologies for myself
being annoyed enough to be impolite to them and write ununderstandable
prose hereeven if obviously on purpose.
Well, I enjoyed it immensely, despite my execrable French.
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:41:34PM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
On 5/18/05, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, well. But he's still right. This once.
Is there some reason why eat a dictionary had to be copied to all of
debian-devel in order to inform bluefuture of his
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
From what I understand of the history of WASTE. At one time, NullSoft did
infact release WASTE under the GPL. However, AOL (NullSoft's parent company)
didn't like this, and that message on NullSoft's website is because of that.
(And thus, it
On 5/18/05, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:41:34PM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
On 5/18/05, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, well. But he's still right. This once.
Is there some reason why eat a dictionary had to be copied to all of
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:23:35AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
...
the following upgrade paths work:
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server/sarge
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server/sarge - mysql-server-4.1/sarge
but this does not:
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server-4.1/sarge
so at this point,
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:40:06AM -0700, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Now, from what I understand, once you release something under the GPL, you
cannot un-release it. And if that is the case, then this software is OK.
You're assuming the people who released it had the right to do that in
This topic has been beat to death and is the cause for most of the
devs bailing throughout the life of the project (legal concerns).
There are a couple old articles on /. that should cover all the
arguments (in the comments)...but I'm sure you'll find them all over.
here's one:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:00:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
4 drop mysql-dfsg-4.1 from unstable/sarge
not exactly an attractive option, but i guess everything is on
the table at this point so it's worth bringing up... the reverse
dependencies aren't nearly as severe as i had assumed, actually,
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, really, there isn't. It is not possible to send mail to a Debian
mailing list any more without offending somebody. Even if your mail
contains nothing but trivially verifiable facts, somebody will still
be offended (often inexplicably, and
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Thomas Bushnell BSG]
Um:
/bin/mount foo:whatever /bin
That's a huge administrative hassle. Not only do you have to figure
out what programs and libraries /bin/mount depends on so you can make
sure they're on your real root partition, but the
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:38:33AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
This just seems like change for the sake of change, with trivial benefits,
if any.
I agree, and I admit to not having read this whole thread, but has anyone
made a serious argument as to
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 06:53:59PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
Certainly there would have been ways to tell Bluefuture that his mail
was hard to read/understand without becoming offensive.
No, really, there isn't. It is not
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:55:36PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Thanks to base64, I never forward any windows virus to myself, they
are kept in my ~/mail directory. See my ~/pmrc/executables in master
for generic anti windows-executable recipes.
I recently found this other source of procmail
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:42:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
According to http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/, the official
count of release-critical bugs affecting testing is 61. Since security
bugs are an, er, renewable resource, and can be fixed out-of-band, we
can exclude them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
I agree that the previous mail was not very easy to read,
election results - Rolex or Cartier or Breitling
http://reordering.t6i.net/rep/vron/unobserved.html
As seen on Fox News - Rolex Replicas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Yes, you are correct. I am assuming that.
As far as I can tell, even if AOL didn't approve it, NullSoft, being
the owners of the code, are allowed and able to release the code
under whatever license they want to release it under. (Whether
they'll get in trouble or not from AOL, for doing
That's a huge administrative hassle. Not only do you have to figure
out what programs and libraries /bin/mount depends on so you can make
sure they're on your real root partition, but the packaging system
doesn't - and shouldn't - do anything to help you keep the two copies
of /bin in
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No. Debian is figuring it out. My whole point is that you've shifted
the job of doing so to the site admin. If you are expecting dpkg to
take on the responsibility for peeking under people's mounted /bin
directories and installing/upgrading things
[Charles Iliya Krempeaux]
It seem to me that they got in trouble for doing so. And then tried
to take things back. But the GPL doesn't allow for that.
It seems to me that this is another of those things everyone takes for
a postulate just because the FSF said so. Rather like the assumption
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
- the exclusion of bugs that are tagged both sarge and sid
(e.g. #303860) is obviously wrong
BTW: is there a way to make unstable updates not close the bugs in question
but mark them woody and/or sarge? If not, should the changelog simply
contain
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
debian-devel has acquired a reputation for being rather unfriendly and
intimidating place, but there's no need to perpetuate that.
Politeness doesn't take much more effort than being rude.
I don't think one should judge debian-devel based on this though --
Peter Samuelson wrote:
I know at least one developer on a prominent open source project who
believes otherwise, and claims to be prepared to revoke their license
to her code, if they do certain things to piss her off. Presumably
this is grounded on the basis of her having received no
Steve Langasek wrote:
With the delays in getting
t-p-u built across architectures, that's not long enough for me to be
comfortable.
I didn't realize t-p-u took so long. But I suppose that's the way it is.
Thanks for the explanation, and thank you for your work on getting Sarge
out the door!
--
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:49:06AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
- the exclusion of bugs that are tagged both sarge and sid
(e.g. #303860) is obviously wrong
BTW: is there a way to make unstable updates not close the bugs in question
but mark them
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:55:12AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:42:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
According to http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/, the official
count of release-critical bugs affecting testing is 61. Since security
bugs are an, er,
[CCd to relevant parties including the eAccelerator developers]
Hi Roberto,
Just a quick update on distributability of Turck-MMCache / eAccelerator:
I've now contacted Jeremy Malcolm of iLaw (who also happens to be a DD!)
and provided him with a brief history of the two projects, and asked him
On 5/18/05, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I know at least one developer on a prominent open source project who
believes otherwise, and claims to be prepared to revoke their license
to her code, if they do certain things to piss her off. Presumably
this is grounded on the
Jonathan Oxer wrote:
[CCd to relevant parties including the eAccelerator developers]
Hi Roberto,
Just a quick update on distributability of Turck-MMCache / eAccelerator:
I've now contacted Jeremy Malcolm of iLaw (who also happens to be a DD!)
and provided him with a brief history of the
On 5/18/05, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[snip]
Yes, I'm aware that if it's possible to revoke the GPL, it fails the
Tentacles of Evil test, and GPL software would be completely unsuitable
for any serious deployment. Note, however, that but it *can't*
On 5/18/05, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is completely not possible. Once you offer (and someone accepts)
code under the terms of the GPL, they are for evermore entitled to use
*that* code under the GPL.
There are some exceptions to this. For example, if you're not the
Greetings! It seems that we are in need of a 'big usermem' kernel
patch in Debian, so I am considering contributing such a package. It
appears there are two approaches on the net, both in various
incarnations of redhat:
1) user-tunable /proc/self/mapped_base -- this allows setuid processes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xwc
Version : 0.91.5a
Upstream Author : Maxim Baranov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://xwc.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : lightweight
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: webcpp
Version : 0.8.4
Upstream Author : Jeffrey Bakker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://webcpp.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : configurable
Peter == Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter [Thomas Bushnell BSG]
Um:
/bin/mount foo:whatever /bin
I was considering commenting on this, I think if you want to start
going down this track it would be simpler to write/adapt a script that
automatically creates an
Adeodato Simó wrote:
As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
the binary package being described. This is an inconsistency that makes
it a bit harder to massage this data, e.g. with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 21:50:22 -0700
Source: openldap2
Binary: libldap2 libldap2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.30-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:52:44 -0600
Source: cogito
Binary: cogito
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10+20050515-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Kuzminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastian Kuzminsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 12 May 2005 23:46:00 +0200
Source: p7zip
Binary: p7zip
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mohammed Adnène Trojette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mohammed Adnène Trojette
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 19:25:58 -0400
Source: mysql-dfsg
Binary: libmysqlclient12 mysql-client libmysqlclient12-dev mysql-server
mysql-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 4.0.24-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:01:26 +0200
Source: unzoo
Binary: unzoo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 15:59:32 +0900
Source: evolution-data-server1.2
Binary: libcamel1.2-0 libedataserver1.2-dev libedata-cal1.2-dev libecal1.2-dev
libegroupwise1.2-5 libedata-cal1.2-1 libcamel1.2-dev libedataserverui1.2-4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 18:27:10 +0200
Source: revelation
Binary: revelation
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefan Voelkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stefan Voelkel [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 01:25:33 -0600
Source: cl-sql
Binary: cl-sql-sqlite3 cl-sql-oracle cl-sql-aodbc cl-sql-postgresql-socket
cl-sql-postgresql cl-sql-odbc cl-sql cl-sql-uffi cl-sql-tests cl-sql-sqlite
cl-sql-mysql
Architecture: source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:32:41 +0100
Source: netmrg
Binary: netmrg
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.18.2-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Uwe Steinmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Uwe Steinmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
