On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Andreas Barth wrote:
Well, Woody was 3.0, Sarge was 3.1, so the logical next number would be
3.11 for Workgroups.
GREAT!
I'd vote for this! ;-)
Kind regards
Andreas, who really loves such things like finding version numbers
and names because it is so im
* Eduard Bloch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050708 17:10]:
> Debian 4.0 for etch, 4.1 for etch stable release 1, 4.2 for etch stable
> release 2, 4.2a for etch stable release 2 with a minor CD mastering fix
> (for example), etc.pp.
Well, Woody was 3.0, Sarge was 3.1, so the logical next number would be
3.
I suggested "Debian IV", to *really* get rid of minor version numbers,
permanently. Initial release would be Debian IV r0. Point releases would be
Debian IV r1, etc. Next release, Debian V, etc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On 4 Jul 2005, at 11:44 am, Wookey wrote:
> Take a look at this patent (granted this week in europe)
>
> http://gauss.ffii.org/PatentView/EP1170667
>
> I'm fairly sure that apt-get and associated package-integratity
> checking tools could be considered infringing. (Does dpkg/apt have
> a modular
David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm wondering if this wouldn't be better added as a feature to
> aptitude/synaptic, as people who would use apt-get or dpkg would
> probably know grep. The people he was targetting are more likely to use
> one of the package selection tools.
Why not hav
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>In practice, 'extra' is mainly used when Policy forces you to use it:
>that is, if your package conflicts with another package which has
>priority optional or higher
The really sad part is that *this* isn't enforced; there are lots of
"optional" packages which conflict with
> > > That said, I think too we should favor libgcrypt, because it has a
> > > lighter security record.
> >
> > I mailed him about that and SONAME versionning.
>
> I got his reply. As Junichi thought, he doesn't know about SONAME
> versionning. I pointed to him chapter 6 of the libtool manual.
Hi,
> > Are you sure?
> > People were running around GPL is not compatible with
> > openssl license; and LGPL has a option to make the
> > code GPL.
>
> The point of the LGPL is to avoid such incompatibilities. If you can
> link it with proprietary code, you can also link it to code under the
On Jul 09, 2005 at 19:36, Goswin von Brederlow praised the llamas by saying:
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok it seems that I am the only one interrested in this
> > package. I will close the bug.
> > Thanks for your help!
> > Regards Nico
>
> Please don't. Rather do what people
[Gustavo Noronha Silva]
> > +liblibssh 0.11 libssh (>> 0.11-0), libssh (<< 0.11-99)
>
> I don't get the << 0.11-99. Why would you add this?
I imagine he meant (<< 0.12). On the theory that since upstream is
using 0.11 as the soname, upstream 0.12 will probably be incompatible.
signature.asc
D
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ryan Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xmms-openspc
Version : 0.0.3
Upstream Author : Zinx Verituse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://staff.xmms.org/zinx/misc/tmp
* License : GPL
Description : SPC file pla
On 08/07/05, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:03:09PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >> Le Jeu 7 Juillet 2005 21:17, Josselin Mouette a ?crit :
> >> > If we don't start the multiarch effort now, it won't be good for
> >> > etch. Are we postponin
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 09:00:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I guess you would have to divert apt-get and aptitude for that and log
> the invocations.
>
> Actualy with aptitude taking the list of non automatic packages should
> give you exactly the install list.
aptitude has had such k
Why are online drugs popular
http://anarchism.greatmedzsh0p.info/?Kalamazooxtvuybraeszctvillager
If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun.
Gratitude is a sickness, suffered by dogs.
Study the past if you would define the future.
I exist as I am, that is enough.
--
To
On 7/9/05, Manoj Srivastava va, manoj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 22:47:45 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > If these are good settings for dupload, why is it not included in
> > the package as the default configuration for dupload?
>
>Good
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 22:47:45 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> If these are good settings for dupload, why is it not included in
> the package as the default configuration for dupload?
Good by whose criteria? Yours? Mine? Joe random Developer's?
What is more importa
[Manoj Srivastava]
>> 4. Make dupload obsolete, and replace with dput. Make dput the
>>default in debrelease. I think dput would have prevented me
>>uploading my unsigned package.
>
> ~/.dupload.conf:
> $preupload{'changes'} = 'gpg --verify %1';
> $preupload{'sourcepackage'} = 'j=$(echo %
> It is still using a copyrighted/trademarked (don't know which) name
There is no such thing as a copyrighted name. The name does appear to have
been a trademark at one time, but if enough time has gone by without a
product being marketed under that name the trademark will have lapsed.
--
John H
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: drbdlinks
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.tummy.com/Community/software/drbdlinks/
* License : GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE version 2
Description : Man
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, David Pashley wrote:
>
>> On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
>> > Hallo Matthew,
>> > >
>> > > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
>> > > advantage?
>> >
>> > You can do
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> >* Package name: mazeofgalious
> > Version : 0.62
> > Upstream Authors: Santi Ontanon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >* URL : http://www.braingames.getput.com/mog/
> >* License : Not defined yet (will try to work this out with
>
Em Sáb, 2005-07-09 às 22:58 +1000, Hamish Moffatt escreveu:
> That sounds like a good use for hidden questions. But I think we ask way
> too many questions on the whole.
Agreed.
> Does the new Debian user really care if their fonts are managed with
> defoma, a technology they have never heard of?
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok it seems that I am the only one interrested in this
> package. I will close the bug.
> Thanks for your help!
> Regards Nico
Please don't. Rather do what people suggested:
1.) adapt the script to use the dpkg.log
The dpkg log is overly detailed and pro
Em Sáb, 2005-07-09 às 13:54 +0200, Olaf van der Spek escreveu:
> On 7/9/05, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [Olaf van der Spek]
> > > Isn't debconf a bit 'expensive' just to allow pre-seeding?
> >
> > No, it is amazingly cheap and simple.
>
> Don't debconf questions need to b
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Adeodato" == Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Adeodato> I also have heard (but I'm not sure how often does this
> Adeodato> happen, if at all) that it is usefult to have it as a
> Adeodato> built-in when your system is in a sta
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, David Pashley wrote:
> On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
> > Hallo Matthew,
> > >
> > > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
> > > advantage?
> >
> > You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
>
Please uninstall my callwave
feature
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:56:55PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:33:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I posted this to debian-release yesterday, but have received no replies.
>
> So you decided to post it to debian-devel? Seems odd to me...
> but anyway, here
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:33:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I posted this to debian-release yesterday, but have received no replies.
So you decided to post it to debian-devel? Seems odd to me...
but anyway, here my completly non-authorative answer (since I'm
neither the SRM nor an ftp-ma
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 07:28:47 +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Dunno which section of your list this should pertain but "Enforce
> the use of po-debconf for debconf templates" is in my mind.
> This probably needs a few s/SHOULD/MUST in the policy so that we can
> file RC bugs o
I posted this to debian-release yesterday, but have received no replies.
I would like to know if it is possible to get httperf back into Sarge
(for the reasons stated below), or if I should simply not worry about
it.
-Roberto
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:18:16AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> Th
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bob Proulx writes:
> > Sure, native code is always better. But that still won't help when
> > sharing binaries from other distros to and from Debian. Because those
> > other commonly available binaries of which people think are so
> > critical will be 32-bit. (I am
On 20050708T181259-0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
> I've never understood the .X distinction anyway.
>
> What signal is meant by 3.1 versus 4.0? Does your intended audience
> have any concept of the distinction?
The usual distinction, when it is made, is that bumping the major number
indicates a
Dunno which section of your list this should pertain but "Enforce the
use of po-debconf for debconf templates" is in my mind.
This probably needs a few s/SHOULD/MUST in the policy so that we can
file RC bugs on packages which still use the "old style" debconf l10n
system.
There are few of these a
Hello
Maybe I miss something, but have we some Documentation about
alioth/gforge?
And is there some alioth mailinglist (or is debian-devel ok for more
alioth questions?)
Gruss
Grisu
--
Michael Bramer -- http://www.feuerwehr.kreuzau.de/wiki/
PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Linux Sysadmin --
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 20:13:57 +1000, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 1. Review bugs in web browser.
> 2. Identify questionably bug that you haven't already looked at
>before today.
Hint: have a local notebook that you mark bugs you look at.
> 3. Inspect bug report, in new windo
Hi,
This is a huge list, with probably 0 chances of getting
accomplished. How about this: remove every single item from the
list, and only add items when there are people who sign up to be
responsible for the work involved in actually seeing that item come
to fruition?
Mere w
On 7/9/05, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:00:16AM +0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > Em Ter, 2005-07-05 às 21:32 +1000, Hamish Moffatt escreveu:
> > > > Keeping the question priority at 'low' make sure most users will not
> > > > see the question, and th
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:00:16AM +0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Ter, 2005-07-05 às 21:32 +1000, Hamish Moffatt escreveu:
> > > Keeping the question priority at 'low' make sure most users will not
> > > see the question, and that only reconfigure will present it. I hope
> > > you are no
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester wrote :
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:56:51PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote :
> > Le vendredi 08 juillet 2005 ? 06:46 +0900, Junichi Uekawa a ?crit :
> > > > > 1. It's linking with openssl, and claiming to be LGPL, which
> > >
We guarantee 100% authentic software.
http://nejzj.1q5gmijcgbj8g21.lhotacg.com
Fear of a name increases fear of the thing itself.
Courage is fear holding on a minute longer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
[Olaf van der Spek]
> Don't debconf questions need to be translated?
Non-hidden questions should normally be translated, but the package
maintainer can choose if the question should be translated or not (by
not using _Description in the template).
Hidden questions (the prefered way to allow prese
On 7/9/05, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Olaf van der Spek]
> > Isn't debconf a bit 'expensive' just to allow pre-seeding?
>
> No, it is amazingly cheap and simple.
Don't debconf questions need to be translated?
> Did you have any cheaper
> suggestions?
Nothing concrete at
On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:22, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
> Hallo David,
>
> * David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 13:20]:
> > On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
> > > > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
> > >
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 13:44]:
> #include
> * Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 01:12:24PM]:
>
> > > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
> > > advantage?
> >
> > You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
> > s
[Olaf van der Spek]
> Isn't debconf a bit 'expensive' just to allow pre-seeding?
No, it is amazingly cheap and simple. Did you have any cheaper
suggestions?
Having one consistent way to provide install time configuration is
important to be able to share configuration settings across custom
debia
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libclass-errorhandler-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Benjamin Trott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-ErrorHandler/
* License : Dual
#include
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 01:12:24PM]:
> > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
> > advantage?
>
> You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
> sed, awk etc. but in my opinion this should be so easy as
> possible to everyone. Not e
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Nigel Jones wrote:
> On 08/07/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:57:25AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > I'm already seeing documentation referring to "Debian 3.2 (etch)".
> >
> > Where is this? It's certainly wrong for documentation
On 7/9/05, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Ter, 2005-07-05 às 21:32 +1000, Hamish Moffatt escreveu:
> > > Keeping the question priority at 'low' make sure most users will not
> > > see the question, and that only reconfigure will present it. I hope
> > > you are not setting t
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 13:26]:
> #include
> * Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 01:04:23PM]:
> > > > I think there is apt-history a better way.
> > >
> > > For doing what exactly?
> >
> > For doing this without corebutils.
>
> a) grep it is not in coreutils bu
#include
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 01:04:23PM]:
> > > I think there is apt-history a better way.
> >
> > For doing what exactly?
>
> For doing this without corebutils.
a) grep it is not in coreutils but in the grep package
b) you seem to have an allergy to essential packages (you know,
t
On 08/07/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:57:25AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I'm already seeing documentation referring to "Debian 3.2 (etch)".
>
> Where is this? It's certainly wrong for documentation to make assumptions
> about the release version n
Hallo David,
* David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 13:20]:
> On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
> > > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
> > > advantage?
> >
> > You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep
On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
> Hallo Matthew,
> >
> > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
> > advantage?
>
> You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
> sed, awk etc. but in my opinion this should be so easy
Hallo Matthew,
* Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 13:09]:
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hallo Eduard,
> > * Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 13:02]:
> >> #include
> >> * Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 12:06:54PM]:
> >> > I think there is apt-history a bette
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo Eduard,
> * Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 13:02]:
>> #include
>> * Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 12:06:54PM]:
>> > I think there is apt-history a better way.
>> For doing what exactly?
>
> For doing this without corebutils.
Coreutils i
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 13:02]:
> #include
> * Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 12:06:54PM]:
[...]
> > I think there is apt-history a better way.
>
> For doing what exactly?
For doing this without corebutils.
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECT
#include
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 12:06:54PM]:
> But for example:
> apt-history show install
> 2005-07-09 00:12:03: install libstdc++6-4.0-dev
> 4.0.0-12
> 2005-07-09 00:12:03: install libaa1
> 1.4p5-28
> 2005-07-09 00:12:03: inst
Hey,
Em Ter, 2005-07-05 às 10:37 +0900, Junichi Uekawa escreveu:
> --- libssh-0.11.orig/debian/shlibs.local
> +++ libssh-0.11/debian/shlibs.local
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +liblibssh 0.11 libssh (>> 0.11-0), libssh (<< 0.11-99)
I don't get the << 0.11-99. Why would you add this?
See ya,
--
[EMAIL PROT
Em Ter, 2005-07-05 às 21:32 +1000, Hamish Moffatt escreveu:
> > Keeping the question priority at 'low' make sure most users will not
> > see the question, and that only reconfigure will present it. I hope
> > you are not setting the debconf priority limit to low. :)
>
> If we recommend against se
> "Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Santiago> Well, I consider the idea that old bugs deserve more
Santiago> attention than new bugs (or non-old bugs) completely
Santiago> flawed.
I wonder how many old bugs are either fixed (but not marked as fixed)
or irrele
Hi,
* Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 12:02]:
> #include
> * Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 02:14:22AM]:
>
> > sudo apt-history show upgrade
> > 2005-07-09 00:12:03: upgrade gstreamer0.8-alsa=0.8.8-3
> > 0.8.10-1
> > 2005-07-09 00:12:03: upgrade libbonobo2-common=2.8
Hallo David,
* David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-09 12:02]:
> On Jul 09, 2005 at 01:14, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
sn
> beebo root% grep upgrade /var/log/dpkg.log | tail
> 2005-07-09 01:17:02 upgrade eog 2.10.0-0.2 2.10.2-0.1
> 2005-07-09 01:17:09 upgrade gaim 1:1.3.1-2 1:1
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adeodato> I also have heard (but I'm not sure how often does this
Adeodato> happen, if at all) that it is usefult to have it as a
Adeodato> built-in when your system is in a state when it can't
Adeodato> create more proc
65 matches
Mail list logo