Salut,
J'étais à l'instant avec un des responsable des RMLL. Il reste 2 places
de stand. Je lui ai dit d'en garder une pour nous.
Donc est ce que quelqu'un est motivé pour participer à l'organisation de
ce stand ?
Je serai présent toute la semaine et dispo pour annimer ce stand. Je ne
suis pas
Bonjour,
Il est assez fréquent de tomber sur des traductions qui n'ont
manifestement pas été relues sur debian-l10n-french. La plupart du
temps, ces traductions sont gérées par les responsables des paquets qui
les incluent directement sans aucun avis extérieur.
Ce n'est pas pour vous embêter que
Erast Benson writes...
Once you accompany OpenSolaris kernel with GLIBC, you will kill this
capability, you will not be able to run anything other than OSS compiled
for your particular distro. That was my point. And isn't LSB is what
GNU/Linux moving towards to? In OpenSolaris we have its
Floyd,
http://au.geocities.com/comprehensibleness54357
Alphonse Numbers, Acct. Rep. m7785125
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 21 May 2006 05:35, Erast Benson wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 21:11 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:51:09AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
Do you really believe so? Do you understand that such a hybrid will
not run any existing Solaris apps like you will
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Victor Seva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libnuml-cil
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Rodolfo Campero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://numl.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C#
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Victor Seva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libnuml-cil
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Rodolfo Campero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://numl.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C#
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Victor Seva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libnuml-cil
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Rodolfo Campero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://numl.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C#
Description :
Erast Benson wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 12:32 -0500, Michael Banck wrote:
We had a pure NetBSD port before, but so far no non-glibc port got added
to the archive officially (but that doesn't mean it would get rejected
if it was of release quality).
IMHO a glibc-based OpenSolaris would
is drupal debian package effectively orphaned? It is already two
major upgrades (more than a year) behind upstream (and upstream
recommends to upgrade from one version to next so the upgrades to
current might get complicated).
there are bugs asking for new version (one about a year old
On 5/21/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For multiarch this will be an inconvenience though as people might
want to install both 32bit and 64bit of a -dev package. For such small
scripts spliting them into extra packages seems wrong but then you
have to use alternatives or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pcf2bdf
Version : 1.04
Upstream Author : TAGA Nayuta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.tsg.ne.jp/GANA/S/pcf2bdf/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description
I've had some time left and I thought I'd spend that to fix some
bugs...
What should I do with this bug? Roxen2 is only available in 'oldstable'
(woody)... But how do I direct an upload there? Or should I put it into
sarge, so that it can be removed THERE instead?
The same question goes for
OK, I brought this up a while back. (For some reason I can't seem to find the
beginning of the topic, but see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00238.html )
I got a few comments in favor.
Someone asked what syslog other distros are using. RedHat is still using
sysklogd.
However,
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 23:05 -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
Erast Benson writes...
Once you accompany OpenSolaris kernel with GLIBC, you will kill this
capability, you will not be able to run anything other than OSS compiled
for your particular distro. That was my point. And isn't LSB is what
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 10:44 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 12:32 -0500, Michael Banck wrote:
We had a pure NetBSD port before, but so far no non-glibc port got added
to the archive officially (but that doesn't mean it would get rejected
if it was
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 09:49 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 21 May 2006 05:35, Erast Benson wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 21:11 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:51:09AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
Do you really believe so? Do you understand that such a
Erast Benson wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 10:44 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Then provide the Solaris libc and other support libraries somewhere
proprietary applications can use them, while building your system around
glibc.
It is not easy possible to achieve. I'd say it would be
On Sat, 20 May 2006 16:18:44 -0500 Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
Anyway, the background is that James Troup, Jeroen van Wolffelaar and
myself examined the license before accepting it into non-free (which
is three times the usual examination,
It may be three times the usual examination, but when
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:38:57PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
As has already been pointed out: what if Sun Java manages to enter a
future stable (or oldstable) release?
How quickly can Debian effectively drop a package from there?
Is this really a problem? After all, nothing in main can
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Victor Seva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libexpertcoder-cil
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Rodolfo Campero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://expertcoder.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C#
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5/21/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For multiarch this will be an inconvenience though as people might
want to install both 32bit and 64bit of a -dev package. For such small
scripts spliting them into extra packages seems
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 17:09 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 10:44 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Then provide the Solaris libc and other support libraries somewhere
proprietary applications can use them, while building your system around
glibc.
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:59:33PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
(f) you agree to defend and indemnify Sun and its licensors from
and against any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement amounts
and/or expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred in
connection
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 22:45 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 12:32 -0500, Michael Banck wrote:
We had a pure NetBSD port before, but so far no non-glibc port got added
to the archive officially (but that doesn't mean it would get
On Sunday 21 May 2006 17:34, Erast Benson wrote:
--cut--
But I hope you still got me right. For me, all these things are
existing applications which must run. The world is not 100% open
sourced yet and we are in it, we are part of it, therefore my ideal OS
need to be capable to run
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:18:44PM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
Anyway, the background is that James Troup, Jeroen van Wolffelaar and
myself examined the license before accepting it into non-free (which is
three times the usual examination, and was done given the inability to
examine the
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:17:04AM -0700, David A. wrote:
I've briefly folllowed this legal discussion and I understand there are
details and stuff to sort out. Somehow I'm struck by the impression
that there are forces that don't want Sun JVM even in non-free?
No, I don't think your
On Sunday 21 May 2006 19:06, Erast Benson wrote:
-cut--
Clean way would be to extend SUN C library with missing GLIBC
functionality. Btw, have you seen SUN C library code? Its done very
clean, very polished code base which runs at least on i386, amd64, sparc
and powerpc arches.
Peace, but I
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 19:14 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 21 May 2006 17:34, Erast Benson wrote:
--cut--
But I hope you still got me right. For me, all these things are
existing applications which must run. The world is not 100% open
sourced yet and we are in it, we are part
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 09:44:50AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
So, why GLIBC is so important to you? What do you miss in SUN C library?
And why do you think technically impossible to extend SUN C library with
missing GLIBC functionality? I'm just trying to understand your point of
view..
Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pcf2bdf is a font de-compiler. It converts an X11 font from Portable
Compiled Format (PCF) to Bitmap Distribution Format (BDF).
.
FONTBOUNDINGBOX in a BDF file is not used by bdftopcf, so pcf2bdf
generates irresponsible values.
I don't think
On Sunday 21 May 2006 19:44, Erast Benson wrote:
--cut--
So, why GLIBC is so important to you? What do you miss in SUN C library?
And why do you think technically impossible to extend SUN C library with
missing GLIBC functionality? I'm just trying to understand your point of
view..
Glibc is
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 19:40 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 21 May 2006 19:06, Erast Benson wrote:
-cut--
Clean way would be to extend SUN C library with missing GLIBC
functionality. Btw, have you seen SUN C library code? Its done very
clean, very polished code base which runs at
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
[snip]
The installer can use whatever seems most appropriate (does it even log?):
The installer does log and puts the logs at /var/log/debian-installer/ on
the successfully installed system. If the installation fails, the logs (in
the installer ramdisk) are a valuable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: gp2c
Version : 0.0.4pl5
Upstream Author : Your truly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description :
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 18:54 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 09:44:50AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
So, why GLIBC is so important to you? What do you miss in SUN C library?
And why do you think technically impossible to extend SUN C library with
missing GLIBC
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Francesco Poli wrote:
Anyway, the background is that James Troup, Jeroen van Wolffelaar and
myself examined the license before accepting it into non-free (which
is three times the usual examination,
It may be three times the usual examination, but when the license is
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:29:17AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
..there's limited manpower in the world... can not be an acceptable
argument for future development.
Why not? It's certainly better than “with an unspecified amount of work done
by an unspecified labor force, option A can be as good
Re: Erik Steffl 2006-05-21 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is drupal debian package effectively orphaned? It is already two
major upgrades (more than a year) behind upstream (and upstream
recommends to upgrade from one version to next so the upgrades to
current might get complicated).
No, please have
Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Sonntag, den 21. Mai 2006:
PS: Yeah I'm a bit pissed of that we only have people criticizing when we
do great things.
You can get applause if you do great things, not if you do harm to debian and
opensource.
As I said, the license has to be changed.
Alex
--
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 20 May 2006 16:18:44 -0500 Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
Anyway, the background is that James Troup, Jeroen van Wolffelaar and
myself examined the license before accepting it into non-free (which
is three times the usual examination,
It may be
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Raphael,
In that case, ftpmasters accepted it, end of discussion. You HAVE to
accept decisions of delegates within Debian, that's how we can effectively
work.
Nope, you don't have to accept decisions made by delegates. You have
the option to
* Nathanael Nerode:
(2) Upstream status.
There hasn't been a new upstream for sysklogd since 2001.
All of the others are active upstream.
Have you checked if SuSE's syslog-ng is heavily patched? If it's
mostly alright, it's probably a good indicator that syslog-ng is the
way to go (and I
* Turbo Fredriksson:
I've had some time left and I thought I'd spend that to fix some
bugs...
What should I do with this bug? Roxen2 is only available in 'oldstable'
(woody)... But how do I direct an upload there? Or should I put it into
sarge, so that it can be removed THERE instead?
Hmm?
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 13:38 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
It may be three times the usual examination, but when the license is not
*clearly* suitable for the archive under consideration (non-free, in
this case), the general recommendation is to check with debian-legal,
AFAICT.
But this
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 12:34 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
You are not responsible to make that decision in Debian, ftpmasters are.
Criticizing ftpmasters won't help them changing their minds.
If not, it has to help changing the ftpmasters.
Thanks to everyone who worked (even privately)
I don't have a particular opinion for Java in Debian or not, but there
are some points you raise:
Am Sonntag, den 21.05.2006, 12:34 -0500 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
In that case, ftpmasters accepted it, end of discussion.
Don't you think that the main problem here is that there *wasn't* any
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 5/19/06, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:45:46AM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
Well, most of those scripts can be fixed quite easily, some require
a bit more work. I hereby promise to
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:51:58PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Gregor Herrmann]
If you look at by_vote [0] the situation is different:
http://popcon.debian.org/main/editors/by_vote
[0] which seems more relevant to me:
#inst is the number of people who installed this package;
Hi!
Le Dimanche 21 Mai 2006 19:34, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
PS: Yeah I'm a bit pissed of that we only have people criticizing when we
do great things.
I know I shouldn't, but I was really upset by your answer.
I'm happy that people speak up and claim their fear with this licence, and
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 03:23:09PM -0300, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
On Friday 19 May 2006 10:25, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
So, instead of using static feature lists to define an application's
priority with which it would be configured in the alternatives system,
why not use popcon data to do
Need 2 find some locals for sex only, monroe, La.
--
Mobile Email from a Cingular Wireless Customer http://www.cingular.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 18:54 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
because non-glibc Debian architectures does exists (i.e.
FreeBSD,Solaris,Darwin), and it is time to consider them and accept
their existence. Those core architectures are open sourced and their
communities will only grow over
Kolby,
http://au.geocities.com/creepily23335/
Valarie Kurtz, Ref. jzm322
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Wouter Verhelst]
Which, I'm sure, is important for popcon maintainers; however, I
don't think it is very relevant in this discussion (unless you can
point me towards an editor that is implemented as a library ;-)
The problem do not only affect libraries. There are other packages
(with user
On Sunday 21 May 2006 22:48, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
--cut--
Heck, even the installation number have problems. Just check out
URL:http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?popcon=popularity-contest,
showing that 99.72% of the machines reporting to popcon have popcon
installed. I believe that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 368383 general
Bug#368383: dumb manual page for... NAME section on many man pages
Bug reassigned from package `man-db' to `general'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Sun, May 21, 2006 21:18, Josselin Mouette wrote:
PS: Yeah I'm a bit pissed of that we only have people criticizing when
we do great things.
What great things? Taking irresponsible decisions that expose the whole
project to legal actions from Sun? I don't feel like thanking anyone for
I want to suck dick
--
Mobile Email from a Cingular Wireless Customer http://www.cingular.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/21/06, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The precise terms are to be found in the license: as long as the license
is unchanged or unamended (with legally binding additions), the issues
should not be considered solved...
No one has addressed my question about estoppel. My guess is
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 22:38 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Given this legal background of yours, could you please help by using that
to improve the licence, instead of just complaining about how others
handled it? Please give the right example.
I'm afraid I have more interesting things
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Thomas Weber wrote:
Don't you think that the main problem here is that there *wasn't* any
discussion, at least for the vast majority of Debian developers and
users?
No, if we should discuss before taking any action we wouldn't get
anything done. If you really want to
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 09:44 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
because non-glibc Debian architectures does exists (i.e.
FreeBSD,Solaris,Darwin)
Stop the lies.
* The FreeBSD port is glibc-based.
* There is no Darwin port. Fink is a toy based on APT and has
nothing in common
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Romain Beauxis wrote:
I know I shouldn't, but I was really upset by your answer.
You shouldn't be upset.
I'm happy that people speak up and claim their fear with this licence, and
no,
This is OK. They can ask questions and have a right to know why ftpmasters
accepted
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 09:44 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
(Debian-devel, sorry for the spam.)
Erast, you shouldn't post on public mailing lists if you don't even
accept the email replies. Please fix your SMTP server by removing use of
the stupid and broken MAPS RBL, or simply stop posting.
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 22:38 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Given this legal background of yours, could you please help by using that
to improve the licence, instead of just complaining about how others
handled it? Please give the right
Le Dim 21 Mai 2006 23:04, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Fears are unfounded, we can at any time terminate the license by
removing java!
just do it, shall we ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:06:13PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
While we are at it why not remove sections alltogether?
We have the debtags system that by far superseeds the sections and
since the pool structure is used sections have been quite useless.
There are some reasons I'm not
o_O...I wonder if these explicit messages, and these obviously have the intent of being explicit are going to cause the same rise as the last explicit message sent to this list...a shame people send such nonsense to these helpful and knowladgeable lists...*sigh*...
On 5/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
interested in java in non-free, it's not your job to try to forbid them to
work on that.
Not if it hurts the project. And it does.
You think it does. Others do. Others don't. I don't. Start a GR if you
think the ftpmasters are wrong. There's no
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 17:04 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
You think it does. Others do. Others don't. I don't. Start a GR if you
think the ftpmasters are wrong. There's no point in telling everyone that
you don't agree just for the sake of it.
I think this is going to happen.
How can
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:09:04AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
At least so far as I understand it, the ftp-masters (i.e., the people who
did this check) are the people responsible for verifying and checking
licenses in uploaded packages and debian-legal exists as an advisory body
for the
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:24:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 16:17 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Good, but you shouldn't decide what others have to do. Some people are
interested in java in non-free, it's not your job to try to forbid them to
work on that.
Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:06:13PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
While we are at it why not remove sections alltogether?
We have the debtags system that by far superseeds the sections and
since the pool structure is used sections have been quite
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 16:17 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Good, but you shouldn't decide what others have to do. Some people are
interested in java in non-free, it's not your job to try to forbid them to
work on that.
Not if it hurts the project. And it does.
The license is good
Le Lun 22 Mai 2006 00:55, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:24:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 16:17 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Good, but you shouldn't decide what others have to do. Some
people are interested in java in non-free, it's
Le samedi 20 mai 2006 à 19:43 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
Nexenta is absolutely rock stable OS (thanks to legendary Solaris
history)
Solaris history is indeed legendary, but not for its stability.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 03:34:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:45:46AM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
Well, most of those scripts can be fixed quite easily, some require
a bit more work. I hereby promise to help fixing them to the extent
of my capability.
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 15:55 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
If you have a reason to believe that the ftpmasters have *misjudged* the
liability involved,
This is the whole point of the discussion.
or you are approaching this as a mirror operator who is
not comfortable with the license and
Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Sonntag, den 21. Mai 2006:
*snip*
The license is good enough for Debian (ftpmasters took their decisions).
There's no fix to require, but it would be good to continue working them
to enhance even more the license. Such a constructive behaviour would put
us in a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gonéri Le Bouder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: blockattack
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : Poul Sander
* URL : http://blockattack.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description :
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:06:42AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Lun 22 Mai 2006 00:55, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:24:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 16:17 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Good, but you shouldn't decide what
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:51:38PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Le Dim 21 Mai 2006 23:04, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Fears are unfounded, we can at any time terminate the license by
removing java!
just do it, shall we ?
Gets my, uncountable, vote.
Cheers,
Brett.
--
On 5/19/06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
(b) the Software is distributed with your Operating System, and
such distribution is solely for the purposes of running Programs
under the control of your Operating System and designing,
developing and
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:18:19PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
* Package name: gp2c
Version : 0.0.4pl5
Upstream Author : Your truly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Michael wrote:
Speaking realistically, such a move of Sun would be spectacularly bad PR
for them esp. considering their statements about future Java licensing
efforts they have committed to.
That's true. But why did they release this license and used no other
wording?
You
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] list has been superseded by the list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (see: http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas).
-Original Message-
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from fire.cisco.com (firebird.cisco.com)
by Cisco.COM (PMDF V5.1-7 #12361) with ESMTP id
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:27:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Matt Taggart and others [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Several people have been working on a project we've been calling
multiarch,
to seamlessly support running applications for multiple different binary
targets on the
Hi Tom,
(I am the upstream author of Polipo.)
I have just checked the sources of polipo 0.9.8-1, and this bug is
still present. This is a serious security bug, but is mitigated by
the Debian installation.
The bug allows anyone who has access to Polipo's local web server to
read any file that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kai Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: flup
Version : 0.1913
Upstream Author : Allan Saddi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.saddi.com/software/flup
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given the word estoppel only has meaning in jurisdictions deriving
from English common law, I think it'd be silly to assume it works the
way you think it does in any of the other jurisdictions Debian or any of
its mirrors may come in contact
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Similary any vi extension should top vi itself. Also zile, emacs,
xemacs build kind of a progression.
Kind of progression??
-Miles
--
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us. -- Jerry Garcia
--
To
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:58:18PM -0500, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Thomas Weber wrote:
Don't you think that the main problem here is that there *wasn't* any
discussion, at least for the vast majority of Debian developers and
users?
No, if we should
On Sun, 21 May 2006 16:17:52 -0500, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
If Sun doesn't fix the license (and I don't think it is our work to fix
The license is good enough for Debian (ftpmasters took their decisions).
There's no fix to require, but it would be good to continue working them
to enhance
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:30:59PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 20 mai 2006 à 19:43 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
Nexenta is absolutely rock stable OS (thanks to legendary Solaris
history)
Solaris history is indeed legendary, but not for its stability.
Well, when you consider
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:08:17AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 15:55 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
If you have a reason to believe that the ftpmasters have *misjudged* the
liability involved,
This is the whole point of the discussion.
Not that I can see.
Adam Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As Bill Allombert just pointed out, the Intention To Package process was
clearly subverted:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-newpackage
Assuming no one else is already working on your prospective package,
you must
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:27:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
- Allow arch specific depends
I propose to use Depends: pkg:arch (= 1.2-3) as syntax for
thses. While for etch no package should use them dpkg should accept
them so installing
Hmmm...interesting...the other time someone posted something explicit and someone replied to it and pointed it out, everyone joined in and investigated it...this time the person who points it out gets criticized...go figure...I always get the short end of the stick...
On 5/21/06, Bas Zoetekouw
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
