Hi,
thanks for the numerous offers and replies.
I forgot to mention that most (if not all) of these are managed with
git. I don't use dpatch or similar tools - managing patches is the SCM's
job.
The archives mostly are on netz.smurf.noris.de; if your package is
not, and you're interested in
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:12:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hm, that used to be a magic combination that would let dpkg do the
right thing.
I've heard this stated before, but if it was ever true, it's definitely not
the case with apt (or with britney), and it's not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mohammed Adnène Trojette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: ttf-nafees
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Center for Research in Urdu Language Processing (CRULP,
http://www.crulp.org/)
* URL :
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
What Martin Krafft showed you was,
How do I know that person actually was Martin Krafft?
So if you have no idea whether or not someone was Martin Krafft, how
can you ask everyone to revoke all signatures for Martin
The little Perl script can calculate how heavy a package depends on other
packages and is depended by other packages, they are depicted by
depends_score and rdepends_score.
Another purpose (also my original purpose) is to analyse the changes
in unstable version, so I can know whether it's safe
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: live@lists.debian-unofficial.org; debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:51 PM
Subject: Package Selection for Debian Live
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu;
Liu Yubao writes...
The little Perl script can calculate how heavy a package depends on other
packages and is depended by other packages, they are depicted by
depends_score and rdepends_score.
With the help of Brendan O'Dea I wrote something similar a while back as a way
of determining the
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 05:52:43PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
whatever) I would retry...
Very easy:
dget
You can run this script, it won't mess up your dpkg/apt state.
run perl apt-update-stat.pl for help.
Because indirect circular dependence is not handled properly, libc gets a
rdepends_score -1000, I don't know why there is circular dependence
and how to deal with it. Can anybody give an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 322762
Bug#322762: /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug)
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks [EMAIL
The issue is with pam_group and /etc/security/group.conf.
I doubt that: /etc/security/group.conf is empty (apart from comments).
I have been tinkering with this every now and then and the problem won't
go away. It even seems to manifest itself at random!
For example, I created a user testuser
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 05:52:43PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
akire:/build/glibc/glibc-2.3.6# dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot | tee
../glibc-build-2006-05-30.log
dpkg-source: building glibc in glibc_2.3.6-7+gcc41.diff.gz
...
So, it's on its
This one time, at band camp, Juha Jäykkä said:
The issue is with pam_group and /etc/security/group.conf.
How can I debug this further? I don't know how the kernel checks the
permissions, since apparently the output of id and what groups the
kernel thinks the user belongs to, differ. Perhaps
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Doubtful. Several things might cause this behavior (slow slapd timing
out, nscd caching bad information, group queries set up wrong), but it's
Nscd's off since it *WILL* cache up the wrong info every now and then
without a clear indication of why. This I thought might be ldap timeout
issue,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:12:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:22:51AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Steve Langasek schrieb:
Package: oldpkg
Depends: newpkg
Description: transitional dummy package
Package: newpkg
Replaces: oldpkg
Conflicts: oldpkg
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png for m68k? Seems to be
heading in the wrong direction again for being a release candidate. I see
12 buildds actively uploading
Hi,
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 01:08, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
The current ITP is not frozen :-)
I have a package ready at the moment. However, it only cleanly builds
with the version of gcc in Sarge. I have been assured by upstream that
a new release is forthcoming which fixes the build
[You had removed m68k-build from the Cc list. Was that on purpose?]
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png for m68k? Seems to be
heading in the wrong direction again
Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:12:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:22:51AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Steve Langasek schrieb:
Package: oldpkg
Depends: newpkg
Description: transitional dummy package
Package: newpkg
Hi,
is it possible for a 'building' package to send a mail to the buildd
admin of the current buildd machine (i.e. something like
[EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Reason: somewhere around Sep-Nov 2005, an alternative symlink was left
by the octave2.1 package in state 'manual'. This means that packages
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:16:47PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
is it possible for a 'building' package to send a mail to the buildd
admin of the current buildd machine (i.e. something like
[EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Usually (at least for most m68k buildds) the buildd runs under *surprise*
the use
Pedro Macanas wrote:
There is no XFCE version (see http://live.debian.net/wiki/Download ).
Previously there was a XFCE version.
There will be one as soon as Xfce is installable in sid again.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a package ready at the moment. However, it only cleanly builds
with the version of gcc in Sarge. I have been assured by upstream that
a new release is forthcoming which fixes the build issues with gcc 4.x.
Once it is out, the package will
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:35:47PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[You had removed m68k-build from the Cc list. Was that on purpose?]
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
Dear Debian people,
I have completed a reasonably working version of 'debdelta', a package
suite to compute differences between Debian packages.
For sake of clarity, let's call '.debdelta' a file that encodes
the differences between Debian packages, and '.deb' a Debian package.
The command
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour Thomas!
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Goirand said:
Hello!
Is there somebody in Shanghai from Debian able to check my ID
and sign my key? If there is none, is there somebody in
Henning Makholm dijo [Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:10:51AM +0200]:
Scripsit Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do agree with Manoj that this was *not* a legitimate experiment (i.e.
not a red team test) and that Martin *did* abuse our [0] trust [1]
A KSP that depends on there
also sprach A Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.05.31.1706 +0200]:
I have completed a reasonably working version of 'debdelta', a package
suite to compute differences between Debian packages.
Nice. I assume you saw
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg02676.html ?
Unfortunately my
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png for m68k? Seems to be
heading in the wrong direction again for being a release candidate. I see
12 buildds actively
Since m68k pretty much depends on the gcc-4.1 transition to make it in
again, I would suggest that we (as in, the m68k port) make the switch to
GCC4.1 as the default already. This will allow us to verify that stuff
actually builds and works, and to catch up with building those that fail
with
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:05:13PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:12:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:22:51AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Steve Langasek schrieb:
Package: oldpkg
Depends: newpkg
Description: transitional dummy
Since monday, I have a server. I'm working on creating a basic process to
import files via ftp upload.
I created the Alioth group apt-pixmap and imported already created scripts on
its CVS.
Regards,
Gonéri
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:05:13PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:12:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:22:51AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Steve Langasek schrieb:
Package: oldpkg
Depends:
On 30 May 2006, Theodore Tso stated:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
What Martin Krafft showed you was,
How do I know that person actually was Martin Krafft?
So if you have no idea whether or not someone was Martin Krafft, how
can you ask everyone to
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Then there's the issue of tracing who did an actual upload into the real
world. A name on a GPG key is not, by any means, an effective way to do
that, since it does not contain enough information to get out the black
helicopters.
Am Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 04:20 schrieb Luc Verhaegen:
Imho there should be an X implementation of this:
* driver side should be possible entirely from within the ddc module:
the ddc module could probe and initialise the ddci slave address for the
driver when handed the I2C bus for ddc and
Good evening^Wmorning,
I have uploaded mdadm 2.4.1-2 to unstable (should be ready for
(non-production) use, no *big* changes), and 2.5-1 to experimental
(*big* changes, works in my case, YMMV).
If you want to give 2.5-1 a whirl, I would appreciate it. Until the
initramfs-tools maintainers have
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 04:20 schrieb Luc Verhaegen:
Imho there should be an X implementation of this:
* driver side should be possible entirely from within the ddc module:
the ddc module could probe and initialise the ddci slave address for the
driver when handed the
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:41:52AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Then there's the issue of tracing who did an actual upload into the real
world. A name on a GPG key is not, by any means, an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:20:14 +0200
Source: glibc
Binary: libc0.1-prof libc6-dev-amd64 locales-all libc6-i686 libc6-dev-ppc64
libc0.3-pic glibc-doc libc0.3 libc0.1-i686 libc6.1-dev libc6-s390x
libnss-files-udeb libc6-dev-sparc64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:51:28 -0500
Source: slrn
Binary: slrn slrnpull
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.8.1pl1-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Norbert Tretkowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:56:07 -0500
Source: xmlstarlet
Binary: xmlstarlet
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alex Mauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alex Mauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:02:37 +0200
Source: octaviz
Binary: octaviz
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.0-26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:03:21 +0200
Source: xmovie
Binary: xmovie
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.9.12-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:08:10 +0200
Source: wzdftpd
Binary: wzdftpd-mod-perl wzdftpd-back-mysql wzdftpd-dev wzdftpd-back-pgsql
wzdftpd wzdftpd-mod-tcl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:49:51 +0200
Source: gpsim
Binary: gpsim gpsim-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.20.14-7.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen M Moraco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steffen Joeris [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:23:59 +0200
Source: ibm-3270
Binary: c3270 s3270 pr3287 x3270 tcl3270 xfonts-x3270-misc 3270-common
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.3.4p6-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Blank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:53:56 +0200
Source: courier
Binary: courier-mlm courier-ldap courier-faxmail courier-pcp courier-maildrop
courier-imap courier-mta-ssl courier-pop-ssl courier-base sqwebmail courier-ssl
courier-pop courier-mta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:00:42 +0200
Source: gnome-applets
Binary: gnome-applets-data gnome-applets-dbg gnome-applets gnome-applets-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.14.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:36:45 +0200
Source: gnome-session
Binary: gnome-session
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.14.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Loic Minier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:01:27 +0200
Source: pessulus
Binary: pessulus
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Loic Minier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:29:30 +0200
Source: gnome-desktop
Binary: libgnome-desktop-dev gnome-desktop-data gnome-about libgnome-desktop-2
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.14.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:28:13 +0200
Source: gnome-nettool
Binary: gnome-nettool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.14.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Loic Minier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 16:58:22 +0200
Source: tinyca
Binary: tinyca
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Ulrich Scholler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christoph Ulrich Scholler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:39:44 -0400
Source: vim
Binary: vim-full vim-lesstif vim-common vim-gnome vim-doc vim-runtime vim
vim-gtk vim-perl vim-ruby vim-gui-common vim-tiny vim-python vim-tcl
Architecture: source all i386
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 22:43:51 +0200
Source: jove
Binary: jove xjove
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.16.0.70-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Cord Beermann [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 22:24:33 +0100
Source: debroster
Binary: debroster
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Vernon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Vernon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:02:10 +0200
Source: libdebian-installer
Binary: libdebian-installer4 libdebian-installer-extra4
libdebian-installer4-udeb libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb
libdebian-installer4-dev
Architecture: source s390
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:00:49 +0200
Source: dbus
Binary: libdbus-1-cil libdbus-glib-1-dev dbus-1-utils libdbus-qt4-1-dev
python2.4-dbus libdbus-qt-1-1c2 libdbus-glib-1-2 libdbus-1-2
monodoc-dbus-1-manual dbus-1-doc dbus libdbus-1-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 22:57:17 +0200
Source: synergy
Binary: synergy
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:41:46 +0200
Source: ispell-tl
Binary: aspell-tl itagalog
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.02-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jan Alonzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 21:37:27 +
Source: grub
Binary: grub-disk grub grub-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.97-9.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Grub Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Frederik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:03:55 +0200
Source: xkeycaps
Binary: xkeycaps
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.47-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:33:41 +0200
Source: sig2dot
Binary: sig2dot
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.37
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:52:47 +0200
Source: libgii
Binary: libgii0 libgii0-target-x libgii0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.9.1-0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:55:40 -0400
Source: mhash
Binary: libmhash-dev libmhash2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Chris Hanson [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 14:08:24 -0700
Source: xdialog
Binary: xdialog
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stan Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stan Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:48:37 +0200
Source: sbm
Binary: sbm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.7.1-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: RISKO Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: RISKO Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:48:19 -0400
Source: autopartkit
Binary: autopartkit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Joey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:46:37 -0400
Source: partman-base
Binary: partman-base
Architecture: source i386
Version: 85
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Joey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:55:57 -0400
Source: partconf
Binary: partconf-mkfstab partconf-find-partitions partconf
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:07:40 +0200
Source: kdemultimedia
Binary: kdemultimedia-kappfinder-data libarts1-audiofile krec
kdemultimedia-kfile-plugins kdemultimedia-doc-html kdemultimedia mpeglib kmid
kmix kdemultimedia-dbg kaudiocreator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:07:48 +0200
Source: mdadm
Binary: mdadm mdadm-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu mdadm maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: martin f.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:38:58 -0400
Source: xgalaga
Binary: xgalaga
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.34-37
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 02:20:22 +0200
Source: mdadm
Binary: mdadm mdadm-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.5-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu mdadm maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 01:11:16 +0200
Source: basilisk2
Binary: basilisk2
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.9.20060529-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:01:38 -0300
Source: update-manager
Binary: update-manager
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.42.2ubuntu22-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:28:53 -0400
Source: graphmonkey
Binary: graphmonkey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Seidenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Seidenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 22:09:46 +0200
Source: tramp
Binary: tramp
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:2.1.6-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Romain Francoise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Romain Francoise [EMAIL
On our way to a fire, are we?
soon meet u 1$digit pm italian some forever
Best regards,
Nikki
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
90 matches
Mail list logo
