On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:03:13 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 07:56:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> OK, I see I have to dot the i's and cross the t's for this case
>> here. So, here is the scenario: package python-foo packages a
>> public pure pyth
"Matthew R. Dempsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:21:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> We don't allow multiple mtas because a mail-transport-agent is
>> *required* to provide /usr/sbin/sendmail.
>
> Why can Debian's alternatives system not alleviate this conflict?
I
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:08:19 +0200
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:35:42PM +0200, Marco Bertorello
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Marco Bertorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Package name: furl
> >
* Simon Huggins:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> maintainer addresses HAVE to accept bug reports and mails from
>> non-subscribers. This setting is not correct, please fix it asap.
>
> If messages do indeed get through to the list why is this a problem?
You
* Thomas Bushnell:
>> As a countermeasure, the FSF tries to extend copyright to interfaces,
>> so that you do create a derivative work merely by programming to a
>> specific interface of a library written by someone else, without
>> copying their code. I'm not sure if this is such a bright idea.
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, [UTF-8] Linas Žvirblis wrote:
maybe not with a so nice UI than vmware, but that is definitely
writeable IMHO.
That is being worked on as I type this.
OT, but does anybody know whether I can operate on VMs in
VMware without this fancy UI? I just want to turn on two VMs on
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 07:56:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> OK, I see I have to dot the i's and cross the t's for this
> case here. So, here is the scenario: package python-foo packages a
> public pure python module. Package bar imports the module
> foo. Package baz is a packa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tptest-gui
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.datanom.net/tptest
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Descri
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:45:02PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:26:51 -0500
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > To say that any library fixing security problems will require a reboot
> > is outrageous. It is quite possible to restart any impacted ser
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:21:07 +1000, Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 19:56 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Here there are two cases. Either module foo can't be written at all
>> for version 2.6, or it the same functionality can be provided with
> This is a littl
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:37:15 +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Le dim 13 août 2006 22:17, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>> As to the BOF thing, I'll bite: Why one earth did the bof
>> come up with design decisiosn that require every single goldarned
>> python module package
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 19:56 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>Here there are two cases. Either module foo can't be written at all
>for version 2.6, or it the same functionality can be provided with
This is a little simplistic.
The parser changes fairly routinely in python versions. This me
Hi,
OK, I see I have to dot the i's and cross the t's for this
case here. So, here is the scenario: package python-foo packages a
public pure python module. Package bar imports the module
foo. Package baz is a package not yet written that would be written
for Python2.6 that would als
Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Mueller wrote:
>> My reason for this: I expect that I'm not the only one who doesn't like
>> jigdo much and hope that torrents would give the installer betas a wider
>> audience (even if not much wider).
>
> Official torrents are linked to from
> http://www.debian.org/devel
Hi,
Grave bug #364351 was filed in December, and it has seen basically no
activity since April. The new upstream version, 4.0, seems to have
fixed the reported problems.
I am Cc:ing this mail to debian-devel to ping the public for their
opinions... Last upload by the maintainer Christian Leutlof
Le dim 13 août 2006 22:17, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> As to the BOF thing, I'll bite: Why one earth did the bof come
> up with design decisiosn that require every single goldarned python
> module package to be reuploaded every time a new version of python
> is added or removed?
actuall
On Aug 13, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you aren't running windows then xen is your free alternative. If
> you need windows then you need a recent cpu for xen+windows.
I always love when somebody knows what I need...
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:28:43 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:32:27AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:01:37 -0700, Steve Langasek
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:10:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrot
Hello Peter,
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Goswin von Brederlow]
>> Instead move the things in etc that need writing to other places:
>>
>> 1) link /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts and create a dummy /proc/mounts on /
>>for when /proc isn't mounted (works with quota in current kern
Sven Mueller wrote:
> My reason for this: I expect that I'm not the only one who doesn't like
> jigdo much and hope that torrents would give the installer betas a wider
> audience (even if not much wider).
Official torrents are linked to from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
--
see
Frans Pop wrote:
> The Debian Installer team is proud to announce the third beta release
> of the installer for Debian GNU/Linux Etch.
For what it's worth, I created a .torrent file for the first i386 DVD of
the set. If anyone is interested, I'm currently seeding with two
machines at a max total o
also sprach Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.14.1917 +0100]:
> does that imply that an ITP is not checked against the current available
> packages? Should there be a check?
The package was hardly current by the time the ITP was filed. In
fact, I did not check whether it was simply a huge ma
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 12:28:15PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Why do you insist on programming bugs into cdrtools that linux
> > >> di
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:02:22PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1418 +0100]:
> > * Package name: python-alsaaudio
>
> Sweet. An ITP for a package already in unstable...
>
does that imply that an ITP is not checked against the curren
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> maintainer addresses HAVE to accept bug reports and mails from
> non-subscribers. This setting is not correct, please fix it asap.
If messages do indeed get through to the list why is this a problem?
--
--( "Everybody,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwww-mediawiki-client-perl
Version : 0.31
Upstream Author : Mark Jaroski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~markj/WWW-Mediawiki-Client-0.31/
* License : Pe
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:32:27AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:01:37 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:10:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> >> 3.1.3. Provides
> >> >> Packages with public modules and extensions shoul
Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Why do you insist on programming bugs into cdrtools that linux
>> >> distributions have
Em Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:31:50 +0200
Michal Politowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:29:13 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> [...]
> > a Ubuntu CD; I patched the program to also look for Debian CDs, and
> > to avoid messing with translations, the messages have Ubuntu
> >
Em Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:38:20 +0200
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:29:13PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > update-notifier is a program made by the Ubuntu guys which puts a
> > notification icon in the notification area and warns the user a
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
>> > repository, nor any way of creating them.
also sprach Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1658 +0100]:
> There is vim available from Debian repositories as well as emacs.
Yes, but emacs will be removed.
(this is a reply-to experiment)
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. kr
Hi,
> > vmware
>
> QEMU:
I really don't get this (type of) discussion...
Some people prefer qemu, some others vmware, still others prefer foo.
There is vim available from Debian repositories as well as emacs. You can
install KDE as well as Gnome, fvwm, ... why not provide qemu as well as bochs
Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
> and vmware-modules-source packages based on
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> maybe not with a so nice UI than vmware, but that is definitely
> writeable IMHO.
That is being worked on as I type this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1505 +0100]:
> > > * Package name: python-alsaaudio
> >
> > Sweet. An ITP for a package already in unstable...
>
> well I must be blind or sth, but apt-cache search python alsa answer
> nothing for me ...
lapse:~> apt-cache policy p
Le dim 13 août 2006 16:02, martin f krafft a écrit :
> also sprach Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1418 +0100]:
> > * Package name: python-alsaaudio
>
> Sweet. An ITP for a package already in unstable...
well I must be blind or sth, but apt-cache search python alsa answer
nothin
also sprach Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1418 +0100]:
> * Package name: python-alsaaudio
Sweet. An ITP for a package already in unstable...
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud De
Le dim 13 août 2006 15:24, Adrian von Bidder a écrit :
> On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > > repository, nor any way of cre
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> vmware
QEMU:
> * is quite fast
Quite fast with the accelerator module. There is also full
virtualization mode, that can be used with certain operating systems.
> * does suspend/resume quite beautifully
It can save memory state and load it later on startup.
> * t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-alsaaudio
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Casper Wilstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : Python Software Foundation License
Progra
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:29:13PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> update-notifier is a program made by the Ubuntu guys which puts a
> notification icon in the notification area and warns the user about
> updates being available, and allowing them to run update-manager (a
> simple upgrade man
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:29:13 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
[...]
> a Ubuntu CD; I patched the program to also look for Debian CDs, and to
> avoid messing with translations, the messages have Ubuntu replaced by
> Debian in runtime, after the translation is got from gettext if the CD
> that was
On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> > a tool that will build (f
maintainer addresses HAVE to accept bug reports and mails from
non-subscribers. This setting is not correct, please fix it asap.
-- Message transmis --
Subject: Your message to Yaird-devel awaits moderator approval
Date: dim 13 août 2006 13:45
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
#include
* Joerg Schilling [Sun, Aug 13 2006, 12:28:15PM]:
> The original sources do not have such bugs and many Debian users that
Most of that is true if and only if the users follow your
recommendations and strictly use kernel 2.4.x, ide-scsi emulation and
install your programs as suid-root.
also sprach Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1236 +0200]:
> I know that QEMU Accelerator is not distributable, but providing a sort
> of an installer (or even asking an author for a permission to
> distribute) should not be any harder than providing an installer for
> VMware. Both nee
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Why do you insist on programming bugs into cdrtools that linux
> >> distributions have to fix by patching?
> >
> > You should inform yourself
Alle Sunday 13 August 2006 04:06, Goswin von Brederlow ha scritto:
> What you mean is vserver and even more so xen. I hear with the latest
> versions you can even run windows in xen.
You can do that only if your CPU is enabled with VT/Pacifica
virtualization technology.
Regards,
Francesco
--
Loïc Minier wrote:
> Would be nice if we could go as far as shipping binary packages for
> e.g. vmware-player, as Ubuntu does:
Oh come one guys. So instead of providing QEMU + QEMU Acclerator, a
partially free solution, we just go for totally non-free one? VMware was
not an option when there actu
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
> and vmware-modules-source packages based on
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 11:08:10AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:38:20PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > So there is ONE w-b for {i386,ppc,...) and there is one buildd for each
> > arch that connects to that ONE w-b?
>
> No. There is one system where wanna-build databases
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:57:52 -0600, Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat August 12 2006 09:34, Matthias Klose wrote: First time I've
> seen the design goals laid out like this. Thanks, and sorry if this
> is out of place.
>> No, not the whole design goal. Although the document is title
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:01:37 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:10:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >> 3.1.3. Provides
>> >>
>> >> Packages with public modules and extensions should be named, or
>> >> should provide, python-foo. Pure Python public
also sprach Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.0106 +0100]:
> I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to
> create a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server)
> vmware-server and vmware-modu
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.0125 +0100]:
> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> > a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
> > and vmware-
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:10:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> 3.1.3. Provides
> >>
> >> Packages with public modules and extensions should be named, or
> >> should provide, python-foo. Pure Python public modules that support
> >> all Python versions need not have a Provides field.
> > .
57 matches
Mail list logo
