当アドレスはシステムからの自動送信専用のアドレスになっております。ご意見、お問い合わせは
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
までよろしくお願いします
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, [UTF-8] Linas Žvirblis wrote:
maybe not with a so nice UI than vmware, but that is definitely
writeable IMHO.
That is being worked on as I type this.
OT, but does anybody know whether I can operate on VMs in
VMware without this fancy UI? I just want to turn on two VMs
* Thomas Bushnell:
As a countermeasure, the FSF tries to extend copyright to interfaces,
so that you do create a derivative work merely by programming to a
specific interface of a library written by someone else, without
copying their code. I'm not sure if this is such a bright idea.
* Simon Huggins:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
maintainer addresses HAVE to accept bug reports and mails from
non-subscribers. This setting is not correct, please fix it asap.
If messages do indeed get through to the list why is this a problem?
You can't
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:08:19 +0200
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:35:42PM +0200, Marco Bertorello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Bertorello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: furl
Version : 2.1
Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:21:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
We don't allow multiple mtas because a mail-transport-agent is
*required* to provide /usr/sbin/sendmail.
Why can Debian's alternatives system not alleviate this conflict?
It could be
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 07:56:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
OK, I see I have to dot the i's and cross the t's for this
case here. So, here is the scenario: package python-foo packages a
public pure python module. Package bar imports the module
foo. Package baz is a package
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:03:13 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 07:56:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
OK, I see I have to dot the i's and cross the t's for this case
here. So, here is the scenario: package python-foo packages a
public pure python
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Don Armstrong:
Assuming there's a box available that can handle it, HyperEstraier is
pretty easy to set up and configure to do this sort of thing...
According to what I've heard, it tries to fit the whole database
into memory during index
At 1155469573 past the epoch, martin f krafft wrote:
Why don't those that want to work with QEMU do that, and
those who want to work with VMware worry about its
packaging?
I can't believe we're having this discussion anyway.
It would make sense for each team to keep an eye on what
each
On 8/14/06, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And to some extent, the FSF must claim that it's not possible to
escape the GPL with a second implementation (so that programs linking
to readline must still be GPLed, even though you could use libedit as
a mostly-transparent replacement, for
At 1155544521 past the epoch, Marco Bertorello wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:08:19 +0200
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a real benefit over lynx -dump -head and similar things ?
It' s more little and easy to use... a little utility.
I must specify this in description,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:46:44AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
netbase:
critical network configuration.
It has some ancient cruft like /etc/services (which does more ill
than good), but /etc/init.d/networking is not something one wants to
skip.
Why do you
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:02:31AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if
you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed
something).
What kind of search are you trying to do? Package to DSA? Bug to DSA?
If so, it would
Hi!
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:34:52PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
Instead move the things in etc that need writing to other places:
1) link /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts and create a dummy /proc/mounts on /
for
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:29:13PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
The second feature is quite cool; update-notifier uses hal to detect
that a new CD/DVD was inserted and tries to figure out whether that is
a Ubuntu CD; I patched the program to also look for Debian CDs, and to
avoid
Le Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 09:03:52PM -0500, John Goerzen a écrit :
Say you were a
seasoned Solaris admin, and you installed Debian to play around with.
You get a prompt saying that you have to reboot because zlib or
something has been upgraded. Are you going to think this is a serious
also sprach Marco Bertorello [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.14.0735 +0100]:
It' s more little and easy to use... a little utility.
I must specify this in description, sorry.
$ ls -alh /usr/bin/furl
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8,6K 2006-08-11 10:18 /usr/bin/furl
$ls -alh /usr/bin/lynx.stable
On Aug 14, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is libwww-perl. I don't object to furl, but so far I am not
convinced.
I object, since so far it looks like a worthless waste of disk space.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Em Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:58:53 +0900
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Maybe a way to solve the problem would be to make clear in the package
name, documentation and popup messages that it is not a native Debian
tool? For instance, it could be called Ubuntu update notifier for
Debian.
Em Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:31:29 +0100
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
... twice the size, but it can do a whole lot more. And it has the
added benefit that it can actually fire off GET/HEAD/POST/whatever
requests.
This is libwww-perl. I don't object to furl, but so far I am not
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Em Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:31:29 +0100
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
... twice the size, but it can do a whole lot more. And it has the
added benefit that it can actually fire off GET/HEAD/POST/whatever
requests.
This is libwww-perl. I don't object
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enig40699EE2A035BC4485AA339B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Mueller wrote:
My reason for this: I
Hello Javier,
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-14 13:48]:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:02:31AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if
you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed
I wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enig40699EE2A035BC4485AA339B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Mueller wrote:
My reason for
Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GPL (section 3) does restrict distributions of binaries (object
code or executable form, to use the words of the GPL, to be more
accurate, since the GPL only uses the term binary once, and only to
refer to a completely different issue) and states that
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:29:13PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
The second feature is quite cool; update-notifier uses hal to detect
that a new CD/DVD was inserted and tries to figure out whether that is
a Ubuntu CD; I patched the program to also look for Debian CDs, and to
avoid
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:59:57AM +0100, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:25:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
Dear all,
I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
repository, nor any
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 07:25:07PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.14.1917 +0100]:
does that imply that an ITP is not checked against the current available
packages? Should there be a check?
[..]
The ITP should have been filed a day or so
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Sun, Aug 13 2006, 12:28:15PM]:
The original sources do not have such bugs and many Debian users that
Most of that is true if and only if the users follow your
recommendations and strictly use kernel 2.4.x, ide-scsi
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you really believe that you are able to deflect from the main problem:
The original sources do not have such bugs and many Debian users that
did write bug reports against the Debian version of cdrtools did already
switch to a self
Hi,
I have some more thoughts to offer on the example Steve
presented: in essence, he is talking about a package that has become
incompatible with the version that was in stable.
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:03:13 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at
- With Linux 2.6.x, it is impossible to run cdrecord without
root privs.
Do not believe single persons who claim otherwise as Linux-2.6.x
filters away random SCSI commands when cdrecord does not have
root-privs and as cdrecord heavily depends on
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:09:33PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you really believe that you are able to deflect from the main problem:
The original sources do not have such bugs and many Debian users that
did write bug reports
Anything new regarding libmail-domainkeys-perl? I'd really like to
see this module in Debian.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:57:45PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should look at the video I pointed you at. You just accused me of
being a liar. If i would have your low level I would now do the same you
I did look at this video: it verifies what
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package name: rebase
Version : NA
Upstream Author : Dr. Richard J. Roberts and Dana Macelis
(http://rebase.neb.com/rebase/rebase.staff.html)
URL : http://rebase.neb.com
License :
On Sunday 13 August 2006 09:18, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
* using snapshots and clones based off them are quite useful
Lvm snapshots work just fine.
You've obviously never run VMware if you think that an LVM snapshot is a
replacement for a VMWare snapshot. It leaves me suspicious that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nekohtml
Version : 0.9.5
Upstream Author : Andy Clark
* URL or Web page : http://people.apache.org/~andyc/neko/doc/html/
* License : CyberNeko Software License, Version 1.0
Description : HTML parser for Java
This is
On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
cmake?
I've never used cmake myself, so I can't speak for how nice
it is, but autotools (for all its problems) is
Hello,
On Sat, 12.08.2006 at 20:40:37 +0200, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a countermeasure, the FSF tries to extend copyright to interfaces,
so that you do create a derivative work merely by programming to a
specific interface of a library written by someone else, without
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:02:22PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Paul Brossier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.13.1418 +0100]:
* Package name: python-alsaaudio
Sweet. An ITP for a package already in unstable...
moo :P
at that time, the package was not listed in bugs.d.o, and not
On Monday 14 August 2006 14:43, Steve McIntyre wrote:
The DVD torrents are already produced, just not linked from the page
at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/. Check out
I've committed a change to the d-i page that adds all missing links (there
were a few others that were
Frans Pop writes:
On Monday 14 August 2006 14:43, Steve McIntyre wrote:
The DVD torrents are already produced, just not linked from the page
at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/. Check out
I've committed a change to the d-i page that adds all missing links (there
were a few others
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:36:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hate following up my own message. This is a biased recap of a
discussion Steve ands I had on IRC, and ou should wait his response
before taking my version of the discussion without a grain of salt.
On
Hi
just a little reminder - if you add a debug package to your package in
the archive then always have its priority at extra, not optional.
Reason:
optional is defined as This is all the software that you might
reasonably want to install if you didn't know what it was and don't have
specialized
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if=20
you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed=20
something).
What kind of search are you trying to do? Package to DSA? Bug to DSA?
If so, it would not be difficult to
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:02:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
For dir_index you have to take the FS offline, tune2fs and fsck it or
you totaly corrupt it.
Actually, that's not true. It's perfectly safe to run tune2fs on a
mounted volume to enable the dir_index feature. All directories
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 07:58:20PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
I don't know about the installer, but all filesystems I created with
mke2fs recently also have resize_inode, which isn't even in the tune2fs
manpage.
It's not in the tune2fs man page because e2fsprogs doesn't currently
support adding
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:24:11 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, the cyrus init script is called /etc/init.d/cyrus21, the
courier init script is /etc/init.d/courier-imap and the dovecot init
script is /etc/init.d/dovecot. It would seem to me that if these
packages are
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:06:59 +0100, Peter Collingbourne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
and
Hi list,
I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
but only has a plain Makefile.
1) Can I use dh_make?
2) Does Debian policy have something to say about it?
3) Would it be ok if I converted it to use
Hi again,
Sorry, I forgot the must obvious question.
5) Would there be any interest in the community for be doing it?
This question should have been numbered 1 since it is clearly a
show-stopper:-)
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael at rasmussen dot cc
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:50:44AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
* The system mta should provide /usr/sbin/sendmail, as well as
mailq, runq, and man pages. The alternative system is able to link
several alternatives.
Right, so three should be no problems there?
* The service mta
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:09:33PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
This is of course a lie.or why don't you like to prove it:
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/problems.html
Come back to reallity, the k3b maintainers did already give up with
Debian versions of cdrtools and use
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Hi list,
I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
but only has a plain Makefile.
1) Can I use dh_make?
I don't think so, I hardly use debhelper but I think dh_make is used
when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Greenland wrote:
On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
cmake?
I've never used cmake myself, so I can't
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
cmake?
I've never used cmake myself, so I can't
Am Montag 14 August 2006 21:50 schrieb Michael Rasmussen:
I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
[...]
3) Would it be ok if I converted it to use autotools my self?
Do you plan to support other system than linux in a fork? If no, there is
absolutely no gain in
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:50:51 +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
but only has a plain Makefile.
1) Can I use dh_make?
Sure, just customise the rules file it generates to not call a configure
script. The rules file can really
Wouter Verhelst writes:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
cmake?
I've never
On 2006-08-14 22:33:49, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Do you plan to support other system than linux in a fork? If no, there
is
Well, the software is already prepared to support *BSD, Solaris and
Linux, but I only intent to support Linux - the only thing I use on a
day to day basis.
absolutely
On 2006-08-14 22:55:41, Sam Morris wrote:
Sure, just customise the rules file it generates to not call a
configure
script. The rules file can really contain anything you want, as long
as it
builds a decent package when called. :)
Nice, I have been accustomed to use dh_make and the various
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 09:52:01PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Btw, why always the autotools while
On 14-Aug-06, 15:59 (CDT), Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouter Verhelst writes:
In the case of autotools, the fact is that usually it's configure.ac or
Makefile.am being horribly broken, rather than the autotools.
In my experience, this is greatly exacerbated and perhaps even
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
cmake?
I've never used
On Mon August 14 2006 00:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
... my premise
that pure python modules should only declare Provides when something
exists in the archive which actually *needs* them...
What of stuff which will never be in the archive?
[ask for it is an obvious answer, so...]
Any thoughts
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The *real* problem with the whole autotools disaster is that it promotes
a braindead idea of how to achieve portability: a #ifdef branch for
every different system (or library version, or whatever), strewn
throughout the entire codebase. Real
Am Montag 14 August 2006 23:27 schrieb Steve Greenland:
On 14-Aug-06, 15:59 (CDT), Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouter Verhelst writes:
In the case of autotools, the fact is that usually it's configure.ac or
Makefile.am being horribly broken, rather than the autotools.
In my
Am Montag 14 August 2006 23:10 schrieb Bernd Schubert:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
If used properly, autotools usually do their job; and pretty well, too.
Just have a look here http://lwn.net/Articles/188693
KDE never used the autotools properly (I'd rather call it hacking into it),
probably
This one time, at band camp, Riku Voipio said:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:09:33PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
This is of course a lie.or why don't you like to prove it:
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/problems.html
Come back to reallity, the k3b maintainers did already
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:59:24PM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
Wouter Verhelst writes:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Btw, why always
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The *real* problem with the whole autotools disaster is that it promotes
a braindead idea of how to achieve portability: a #ifdef branch for
every different system (or library version, or whatever), strewn
throughout the entire codebase. Real
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:53:40PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The *real* problem with the whole autotools disaster is that it promotes
a braindead idea of how to achieve portability: a #ifdef branch for
every different system (or library version,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 09:50:51PM +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Hi list,
I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
but only has a plain Makefile.
1) Can I use dh_make?
Sure.
2) Does Debian
Hi,
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-15 03:07]:
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if=20
you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed=20
something).
What kind of search are you trying to do?
Please don't mess with gettext this way. You should ask Ubuntu people to
rewrite the lines so that the 'branding' is removed or, at most, is handled
by a variable that *is* replaced at runtime (this is what was introduced in
Debian Installer). If you do string-based replacement you are going
huggie == Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
huggie On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit
huggie wrote:
maintainer addresses HAVE to accept bug reports and mails from
non-subscribers. This setting is not correct, please fix it
asap.
huggie If
Wouter Verhelst writes:
In my experience, this is greatly exacerbated and perhaps even
primarily due to older versions of autotools encouraging or requiring
behavior that later versions of autotools declare to be broken.
[...]
The situation is not helped when these mutually incompatible
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 11:57:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I explained the upstream authors the difference between main and
non-free, and asked if they think that we can redistribute their data in
a dfsg-free manner, and here is their answer:
REBASE is free to its users and they may use
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:28:58PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006, David Nusinow wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:56:44PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* David Nusinow [Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:37:23 +]:
(I'm seriously
interested in setting up git.debian.org for
[Sorry for sending the message only to you John =(]
Em Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:03:52 -0500
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Not if this is their first exposure to Debian. Say you were a
seasoned Solaris admin, and you installed Debian to play around with.
You get a prompt saying that you
Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
It sort of depends on what you're looking for.
Some advantages of mailing lists:
* E-mail generally has a wider reach -- it gets past corporate
firewalls,
Eduard Bloch wrote:
Then let's see what a user of your software would do, in a
not-so-uncommon use case:
User A wants to burn a CD-ROM. She gets cdrtools,
In reality, as user A, I switched to using cdrdao for making serious audio
CDs and CD-RWs, and for burning disks from .iso files: this
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
You mean the difference between manpages-posix-dev (in non-free) and
manpages-dev (in main)? The first is not proposed by Debian (I still don't
get why anone would want to change a standards document as not changing it
is the whole purpose of its existence.)
In order to
Steve Greenland wrote:
On 14-Aug-06, 15:59 (CDT), Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouter Verhelst writes:
In the case of autotools, the fact is that usually it's configure.ac or
Makefile.am being horribly broken, rather than the autotools.
Oh yeah. Most people don't know how to
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Hi list,
I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
but only has a plain Makefile.
1) Can I use dh_make?
2) Does Debian policy have something to say about it?
No.
3) Would
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Autotools do require you to do things the way they want, indeed. And
every single autotool uses a different obscure language. Some
consistency would be good -- but, I challenge you: write something
that works better. There's a lot of deficiencies in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:07:07 +0900
Source: heartbeat
Binary: libstonith-dev ldirectord libstonith0 heartbeat libpils-dev libpils0
stonith heartbeat-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.4-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:49:00 +0900
Source: heartbeat-2
Binary: heartbeat-2-dev ldirectord-2 heartbeat-2
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:21:47 -0600
Source: cl-uffi
Binary: cl-uffi-tests cl-uffi
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.5.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kevin M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:53:43 -0600
Source: cl-sql
Binary: cl-sql-sqlite3 cl-sql-oracle cl-sql-aodbc cl-sql-postgresql-socket
cl-sql-postgresql cl-sql-odbc cl-sql cl-sql-uffi cl-sql-tests cl-sql-sqlite
cl-sql-mysql
Architecture: source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:13:31 +0200
Source: python-biggles
Binary: python-biggles
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:10:51 +
Source: pan
Binary: pan
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.108-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Søren Boll Overgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Søren Boll Overgaard [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 01:34:55 +0200
Source: ffcall
Binary: libffcall1 libffcall1-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:03:48 +1000
Source: libxfixes
Binary: libxfixes3 libxfixes3-dbg libxfixes-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:4.0.1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:26:30 +0200
Source: zope-plonetestcase
Binary: zope-plonetestcase
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu Zope Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:52:27 +0200
Source: sdcc
Binary: sdcc-ucsim sdcc-doc sdcc-libraries sdcc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.6.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:07:18 +1000
Source: svgalib4libggi
Binary: svgalib1-libggi2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anibal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:36:16 +0200
Source: ldap-account-manager
Binary: ldap-account-manager
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
