On 24 Jan 2007, at 10:08 am, Jean-Michel wrote:
[am-utils]
This seems to works with NFS.
But what's about Samba?
Out of the box, no, but it can do so if you create your maps
correctly; am-utils supports using arbitrary mount programs, so you
can tell it how to use smbmount, for example.
On ven, 2007-01-26 at 14:13 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> I use GNOME because it SUKCETH TEH LEASTEST.
>
> KDE is far worse, IMO.
because it offers more than one way to do things?
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 12:48:47PM -0500, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > For programming languages, I prefer the one that makes programmers
> > > easily understan
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 12:48:47PM -0500, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > For programming languages, I prefer the one that makes programmers
> > easily understand all code written by others. For desktop environments,
> > I pr
Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:23:35AM +, James Troup wrote:
>> unilaterally make the decision that they are or are not OK. If it's
>> the consensus of the release managers and the architecture porting
>> team that they want to use emulated buildds and/or cross compilin
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> For programming languages, I prefer the one that makes programmers
> easily understand all code written by others. For desktop environments,
> I prefer the one that provides the cleanest and most efficient UI. YMMV.
Wow, my extreme GNOME
Le vendredi 26 janvier 2007 à 13:19 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:21:17PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Why do you assume it? The usability processes in GNOME imply, on the
> > contrary, that there is a good way to achieve every use case.
>
> Thank you for this
ressign 408524 linux-2.6
thanks
On Jan 26, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My guess is that it's either the kernel or udev which is doing something
> wrong here. I'm filing this as a bug on udev for the time being; I'm
> sure Marco will properly reassign this bug once you've provided
Twas brillig at 13:19:36 26.01.2007 UTC+01 when Wouter Verhelst did gyre and
gimble:
WV> There most be a GNOME motto, and it says "TSBOOWTDI": There
WV> Should Be Only One Way To Do It.
Actually, it's already the Python motto ;)
--
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Dear all,
I am an anthropologist who study the organisation of Free Software work.
I am concerned with how people and systems manage to coordinate their
efforts in this work, and thus about the power of the institutions,
systems and cultures that bring about such coordination. In order to
stud
Package: udev
Severity: normal
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 06:02:10PM -0500, Dumitrescu, Eduard wrote:
> My computer is connected to my piano through a usb-midi cable. If
> I use my piano while the computer starts up, whether /dev/dsp is
> renamed to /dev/dsp1,
Is that a problem? If so, how? Soft
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:23:35AM +, James Troup wrote:
> unilaterally make the decision that they are or are not OK. If it's
> the consensus of the release managers and the architecture porting
> team that they want to use emulated buildds and/or cross compiling, I
> absolutely will not stop
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Actually, sbuild uses plain apt-get and apt-cache to handle build deps
> these days; so if apt can handle a dependency, then so can sbuild.
>
> The problem really is the fact that experimental has 'NoAuto: yes' (or
> what is it again) set in its Relea
This one time, at band camp, Wouter Verhelst said:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:45:07PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > AFAICS, post-processing of log messages would be the most reliable
> > > method to give admins localized logs while also making it
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:21:17PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Why do you assume it? The usability processes in GNOME imply, on the
> contrary, that there is a good way to achieve every use case.
Thank you for this insight.
There is a Perl motto, and it says "TIMTOWTDI": There Is More Than O
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:45:07PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > AFAICS, post-processing of log messages would be the most reliable
> > method to give admins localized logs while also making it feasible
> > for upstreams to support user requests. Any p
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:20:19AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I would assume 10 days is enough to "automatically" build all that
> > is in experimental...
>
> Some packages can not be autobuilt due to complex dependencies across
> unstable and experi
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:13:37PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
> If you have any particular pet features that have been removed in GNOME
> and you can make a valid case for their re-inclusion, then file a bug.
I'm afraid the GNOME bugzilla can't handle that amount of bugs.
--
Home is where you ha
@begin note to debian developers
dear debian developers: would someone _please_ explain to marc that,
as exim4 is the default mailer for debian, that he is in quite a
serious position of responsibility, and that exim4 needs to cater for
_everybody_'s needs, with the minimum amount of disruption to
19 matches
Mail list logo
