On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:42:35 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
[...]
> Internet mail
> addresses (which are passed to /usr/sbin/sendmail, for instance) must be
> canonicalized before they are used in SMTP. At least that's the theory;
> Exim doesn't do it.
And apparently on purpose:
Exim delibe
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The current version of liferea in Debian unstable (1.4.3-1), as well as
> the latest upstream version (1.4.5) fail if used together with
> libsqlite3-0 from experimental (3.5.1-1). The program works correctly
> with the versions in testing a
tag 446050 help
thanks
The current version of liferea in Debian unstable (1.4.3-1), as well
as the latest upstream version (1.4.5) fail if used together with
libsqlite3-0 from experimental (3.5.1-1). The program works correctly
with the versions in testing and unstable (3.4.2-1, 3.4.2-2).
The fol
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:03:35AM -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Oh, your private e-mail helped me understand what you're proposing.
> You're saying that we could set it up so that the local user could build
> the -dbg packages if they need them.
At this point, wha
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:44:54AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> None, at least from my point of view. Just someone have to do it. (See
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on d-kernel.)
The attached patch should apply on the pruned version.
Bastian
--
We have found all life forms in the galaxy are capable of
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:41:13AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Any reason why your 5701a0-removal patch can't be applied to our kernel
> packages?
None, at least from my point of view. Just someone have to do it. (See
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on d-kernel.)
Bastian
--
There are some things worth
On 2007-10-10, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 October 2007 02:57:59 pm Robert Edmonds wrote:
>> The only rationale for removing the *firmware* is compliance with GR
>> 2006-004...
>
> Reading this feels about like reading someone write, "The only rationale for
> not s
* martin f. krafft:
> also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1145 +0100]:
>> RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
>>
>> 5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
>>
>> The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
>> commands MUST have b
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 02:57:59 pm Robert Edmonds wrote:
> The only rationale for removing the *firmware* is compliance with GR
> 2006-004...
Reading this feels about like reading someone write, "The only rationale for
not smoking cigarettes in this restaurant is compliance with state law."
Hi,
* Reinhard Tartler schrieb am 10.10.07, um 18:39 Uhr:
> Right, but xine-lib in unstable doesn't support it. It will work with
> xine-lib in experimental though, but that is the xine-lib-1.2
> development branch. There is still a lot of work to do there, so I'm
> curious how you plan to package
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Any modification to the tg3 driver to produce a GR 2006-004 compliant
> driver would have to diverge from the kernel team's patch acceptance
> guidelines[0] since upstream is intransigent[1] on making tg3
> firmware-free or firmware-optional. The kernel team does not appear
Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > Any modification to the tg3 driver to produce a GR 2006-004 compliant
> > driver would have to diverge from the kernel team's patch acceptance
> > guidelines[0] since upstream is intransigent[1] on making tg3
> > firmware-free or firmware-optional
Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Robert Edmonds wrote:
>> This package provides the source code for the tg3dfsg kernel
>> module. Kernel source or headers are required to compile this module.
>>
>> This driver complies with GR 2006-004 and should support all Tigon3
>> hardware except for 5701a0 chipse
Thomas Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Debian VDR Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: vdr-plugin-xine
> Version : 0.7.11
> Upstream Author : Reinhard Nißl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://home.vrweb.de/~rn
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The transition from console-tools to kbd has been planned for years
> and the only reason of the delay is the chronic shortage of console
> maintainers in Debian. It seems Alastair supports only console-tools
> and for the rest it is only me and Chris
On 08-Oct-07, 16:15 (CDT), "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. S??nchez wrote:
> > Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
> > for Debian, what is the point of adding another?
>
> I don't see the r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: displayconfig-gtk
Version: 0.3.3
Upstream Author: Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Sebastian
Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: https://la
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:35:15AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Martin-Éric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> * Package name: uspp
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : Isaac Barona
also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1145 +0100]:
> RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
>
> 5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
>
> The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
> commands MUST have been "canonicalized," i.e., t
RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
commands MUST have been "canonicalized," i.e., they must be
fully-qualified principal names or domain literals, not
martin f krafft writes ("Re: RFC 2?821 and CNAMEs"):
> Of course I can ensure that, and that's what I had a while ago: for
> each of my road-warriors (rw.madduck.net; 19 of them; no, not all
> laptops; long story), I had a separate pair of MX RRs.
>
> I sought to simplify that and created rw.maddu
also sprach Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1059 +0100]:
> In particular, I have seen MTAs which would (taking your situation as
> a concrete example, and when relaying mail eg as a smarthost), after
> receiving a mail with
>RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> would look lapse.madduck.net
* Pierre Habouzit:
>> (I don't know anything about Perforce. Perhaps it's really dangerous
>> software. But perhaps it's just non-free.)
>
> OTOH I'm always reluctant to see new things enter non-free when there
> is perfectly suitable alternatives. I mean git, hg, bzr, or even the
> horrible s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdevel-ebug-perl
Version : 0.48
Upstream Author : Leon Brocard, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~lbrocard/Devel-ebug-0.48/
* License : as Perl itself
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Martin-Éric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: uspp
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Isaac Barona Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ibarona.googlepages.com/uspp
* L
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:56:03AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> Is there a reason to still keep kbd around?
Kbd has upstream maintainer, console-tools is dead. Because of this
Alastair McKinstry has already tagged several bugs as wontfix [*].
The transition from console-tools to kbd has been
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Carlos San Esteban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> First of all, I think it's a great idea.
>> Well, we have the src packages then we only needs other package '-dbg'.
>> This one only need to change the options and install the libraries
>> needed, It coul
Carlos San Esteban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First of all, I think it's a great idea.
> Well, we have the src packages then we only needs other package '-dbg'.
> This one only need to change the options and install the libraries
> needed, It could make all the work to leave the dbg program re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
First of all, I think it's a great idea.
Well, we have the src packages then we only needs other package '-dbg'.
This one only need to change the options and install the libraries
needed, It could make all the work to leave the dbg program ready to
us
29 matches
Mail list logo