On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:46:25 +0200
"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/22 Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:39:29 -0700
> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> > Is there any reason this isn't the default behaviour?
> >>
> >> It is the de
2008/8/22 Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:39:29 -0700
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Is there any reason this isn't the default behaviour?
>>
>> It is the default.
>>
>
> Hmmm...I don't know how mine got to this state then. Probably did
> dpkg-rec
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:39:29 -0700
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any reason this isn't the default behaviour?
>
> It is the default.
>
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/fontconfig-config.templates:
>
> Template: fontconfig/enable_bitmaps
> Type: boolean
> Default: false
> Descri
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 464 (new: 2)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 120 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:32:14AM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> I recently had trouble with a website that uses Times and Helvetica
> which I was able to determine was due to unscaled fonts not printing
> well. It took some digging but I eventually, after exploring links and
> browsing /etc/fo
Hi all,
I recently had trouble with a website that uses Times and Helvetica
which I was able to determine was due to unscaled fonts not printing
well. It took some digging but I eventually, after exploring links and
browsing /etc/fonts based on a link about something else for mozilla
that I was l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: ttf-togoshi-mincho
Version: 20071218-1
Upstream Author: mshio
URL: http://togoshi-font.sourceforge.jp/
License: Wada Laboratory (BSD-like licence. It is same as sazanami
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> It is done in a installation where PXE installing work, and the first
> step in the compatibility test is to install Debian Edu automatically
> with all questions preseeded. If installation work, the hard drive
> work.
[...]
Your idea is good, an
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: jardiff
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Antony Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.osjava.org/jardiff/
* License
Recently a bug that was brought to my attention[1] told me that I
should remind everyone about the importance of ordering of changelogs
in their package for the purposes of version control in the BTS.
Be careful when you reorder or add back changelog entries. If you
return to a previous version by
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: failsafec
Version: 1.0.0.1662-1
Upstream Author: Yutaka OIWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: https://staff.aist.go.jp/y.oiwa/FailSafeC/index-en.html
License: THE Q PUBLIC LICENSE vers
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessandro De Zorzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tcpdf
Version : 4.0.020
Upstream Author : Nicola Asuni
* URL : http://www.tcpdf.org
* License : GNU Lesser General Public License
Programming Lang: PHP
Descripti
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 21:18 +0200, Mark de Vries wrote:
> [ I'm not subscribed to the list, will look at archives, but if you ]
> [ can please cc me in replies. Thanks ]
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use libapt-pkg-perl to [log story short] and then download
> the packag
[ I'm not subscribed to the list, will look at archives, but if you ]
[ can please cc me in replies. Thanks ]
Hi,
I'm trying to use libapt-pkg-perl to [log story short] and then download
the packages but I can't find a way to get the actual URI to download
the .deb
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:07:43PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Mike Bird]
> > No one objected to having apt decide by giving priority
> > precedence over lexical:
> It sounds good until you notice just how many dependency resolvers we
> have floating around. dselect, apt, aptitude, pbuilder
[Mike Bird]
> No one objected to having apt decide by giving priority
> precedence over lexical:
It sounds good until you notice just how many dependency resolvers we
have floating around. dselect, apt, aptitude, pbuilder, sbuild - at
least. Don't know if synaptic has its own or borrows from li
[Wouter Verhelst]
> As I mentioned in my blog[1], I kindof like the suggestion that
> Bdale came up with during Debconf that we write a hardware
> compatibility test of sorts that hardware vendors could run on their
> own hardware to test whether Debian works on their system.
I saw Bdales talk an
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 06:24:07AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> So, that's probably it at this point. I should have a look at bdale's
> talk once it becomes available at meetings-archive.debian.net, but that
> doesn't yet seem to be the case. If someone who was at bdale's talk has
> anything to
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 00:52:44 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> The only perl scripts provided by Essential packages are
>
> /usr/bin/scriptreplay
This one comes from bsdutils, and it's fairly short (around 30 lines
with comments).
> /usr/bin/chkdupexe
And this one is a bit longer, but still shor
On Thu August 21 2008 03:22:41 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 04:53:49AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Package exim4:
> > Provides: default-mta
> >
> > Package: foo
> > Depends: default-mta | mail-transport-agent
> >
> > This should be enough to single out one MTA as the o
Le Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:18:25PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
>
> Why don't you build your own CDD?
Because Debian Integrated Solutions (that were formerly called Custom
Debian Distributions) are not forks, but 100 % internal projects :)
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med p
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I offer to fix up all packages to exim4 | mail-transport-agent *and*
Don't do it on any packages that tagged the bug wontfix, at least not
without asking first (AND getting a positive response). Some of the
packages have real reasons to prefer an M
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libhtml-formfu-model-dbic-perl
Version : 0.03002
Upstream Author : Carl Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/html-formfu/
* License : GPL-1+ | Ar
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: feedvalidator
Version : 0
Upstream Author : Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://feedvalidator.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : adv
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thorsten Schmale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: samefile
Version : 2.12
Upstream Author : Jens Schweikhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://www.schweikhardt.net/samefile/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Des
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 11:19 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:37:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Where did you discuss this mass filing of (useless) bugs before you
> > > submitted them?
>
> The previous discussions has lead nowhere. No use in discussing it yet
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:37:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Where did you discuss this mass filing of (useless) bugs before you
> > > submitted them?
>
> The previous discussions has lead nowhere. No use in discussing it yet
> again, instead it's time to act!
>
But mass-bug-filing wit
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 04:53:49AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> > Er, no, that wouldn't happen. As long as packages correctly depend on
> >> > default-mta | mail-transport-agent, this will have no impact on upgrades.
> >> This can happen if user has 'default-mta' package installed, and
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:58:51PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:07:14PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:35:30PM -0300, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > It is possible; I'm currently awaiting feedback from the OpenLDAP
> > > comaintainers before we
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:37:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Where did you discuss this mass filing of (useless) bugs before you
> > submitted them?
The previous discussions has lead nowhere. No use in discussing it yet
again, instead it's time to act!
>
> In particular, these bugs are *c
Steve Langasek schrieb:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=andreas%40fatal.se
>
>>> Your packag depends on postfix | mail-transport-agent. Exim (v4) is
>>> generally
>>> considered the default mta in Debian
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=andreas%40fatal.se
> > Your packag depends on postfix | mail-transport-agent. Exim (v4) is
> > generally
> > considered the default mta in Debian and is also the package prov
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=andreas%40fatal.se
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Your packag depends on postfix | mail-transport-agent. Exim (v4) is generally
> considered the default mta in Debian and is also the package providing
> mail-tran
33 matches
Mail list logo
