Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Have I missed some announcement that DFSG violations don't matter for the release of ‘lenny’? No, because they generally matter. I ask because a whole lot of bug reports of DFSG violations have been tagged ‘lenny-ignore’ without explanation: [...] and

Re: Unable to connect to dbus socket.

2008-10-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 19 octobre 2008 à 13:45 +0200, Guido Loupias a écrit : This is a slightly modified version of the code that is in libnotify_init() which I put in my own program to redirect the output (error-message) to a logfile because I wasn't sure how to redirect g_message() (which is what the

Re: Terminal emulators and command line arguments (again!)

2008-10-20 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon,20.Oct.08, 00:51:03, s. keeling wrote: Just curious, but why 2 3? Why isn't 1 considered the simplest solution? xterm is ca. 300k. What Seyon users can't afford 300k disk space or its RSS? vi's installed on every *nix box on the planet. Why shouldn't xterm be on every X

Processed: Re: Bug#477498: general: Unmounting network filesystems solution (for me at least)

2008-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 477498 initscripts Bug#477498: smbfs: Shutdown Reboot scripts try umount CIFS but CIFSD is killed first Bug reassigned from package `general' to `initscripts'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Re: Bug#477498: general: Unmounting network filesystems solution (for me at least)

2008-10-20 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Sound to me like the cifs startup script need to register their pid to avoid killall killing them at shutdown. The mechanism is already provided by initscripts, now the packages needing it just need to use it. Which package starts this daemon? This issue should be reassigned there. Happy

Re: Bug#477498: general: Unmounting network filesystems solution (for me at least)

2008-10-20 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Petter Reinholdtsen] Sound to me like the cifs startup script need to register their pid to avoid killall killing them at shutdown. The mechanism is already provided by initscripts, now the packages needing it just need to use it. Another alternative is to flag the mounted volume in

Bug#502854: ITP: goby -- WYSIWYG presentation tool for GNU Emacs

2008-10-20 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: goby Version : 0.94 Upstream Author : Kazu Yamamoto * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/goby/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp Description :

Re: Bug#502543: ITP: confget -- Utility to read variables from a configuration file

2008-10-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:48:02PM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: * Peter Pentchev [Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:37:21 +0300]: Description : Utility to read variables from a configuration file Please mention INI-style in the short description, eg.:

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-20 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hello Pierre, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the problem here is somehow very generic, and that using a virtual package like proposed in the bug report (#500176) doesn't scale well. Especially for dns daemons. Packaging two of them myself (nsd3 that is an authoritative

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:48:50AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: While fixing these issues is and should be a goal of Debian, it's hardly something that can be done in the last few weeks before releasing. If I may make a suggestion, instead of trying to justify that Debian should change

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:21:24PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le lundi 20 octobre 2008 à 16:08 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit : Has the current release team lowered the bar on Debian actually trying to follow the social contract? Yes, they have. What if, instead of

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan said: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:41:16AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Has the current release team lowered the bar on Debian actually trying to follow the social contract? Yes, they have. Furthermore, the FTP team (which is

Re: Bug#477498: general: Unmounting network filesystems solution (for me at least)

2008-10-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:57:24AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Sound to me like the cifs startup script need to register their pid to avoid killall killing them at shutdown. The mechanism is already provided by initscripts, now the packages needing it just need to use it. Which

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi everyone, --- will be referred to as you Stephen Gran said: This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan said: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:41:16AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Has the current release team lowered the bar on Debian actually trying to follow the social

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘ lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Robert Millan wrote: Btw, I'm looking for supporters for a GR to stop this gross violation of the SC. Any DDs who read this, please let me know if you're interested. Actually, I think we need a GR on the lines of , | http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 20 octobre 2008 à 16:34 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit : On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:21:24PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: What if, instead of ranting everywhere, you actually contributed code to fix these bugs? I did... And you deserve kudos for that. But that doesn’t make this

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 20 octobre 2008 à 16:34 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit : On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:21:24PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: What if, instead of ranting everywhere, you actually contributed code to fix these bugs? I did... And you deserve kudos for that. But still, it is

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 06:15:57PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: What are the release and ftp team supposed to do here? Sure, I can type in dak rm linux-2.6 and see what happens Move it to non-free. Then have it go to NEW the next time it's uploaded, and go through the usual DFSG-ness check

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Damnit, sent mail instead of moving to drafts. Sorry for the double sending. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 07:16:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: You cannot ask, so late in the release process, Some of these bugs have been known for *years*. In one of them, I even got a reply saying something along the lines of I was expecting this one. -- Robert Millan The DRM

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 20 octobre 2008 à 19:30 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit : On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 07:16:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: You cannot ask, so late in the release process, Some of these bugs have been known for *years*. In one of them, I even got a reply saying something along the

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:08 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:41:16AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Has the current release team lowered the bar on Debian actually trying to follow the social contract? Yes, they have. Furthermore, the FTP team (which is

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 11:43 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Actually, I think we need a GR on the lines of , | http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007 | General Resolution: Handling source-less firmware in the Linux kernel ` To get a special dispensation for

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:48:57AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:08 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:41:16AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Has the current release team lowered the bar on Debian actually trying to follow the

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: I object to a second round of this. I was ok with it once, as a compromise, but the understanding I had then was that it was a one-time thing, to give time to actually *fix* the problem. Note that there is currently active

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems we relied primarily on the release team, which has betrayed the goals of the project, I do not accept to be called names because I firmly believe that Debian's goal is to distribute the best possible free software to our users. All of our work

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘ lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote: I queried Robert on IRC and told him that he does not have a realistic scenario of fixing the bug and that he would need to come up with a working NMUable patch to in order to even have a viable proposition to move things forward.[1] What are the

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-20 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:11 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: I object to a second round of this. I was ok with it once, as a compromise, but the understanding I had then was that it was a one-time thing, to give time to

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 20:18 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Apparently, our control structures are not reliable enough to _enforce_ what we have decided. It seems we relied primarily on the release team, which has betrayed the goals of the project, and only count on the FTP team as a fallback,

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘len ny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20-10-2008 16:32, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote: I queried Robert on IRC and told him that he does not have a realistic scenario of fixing the bug and that he would need to come up with a working NMUable

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Manoj Srivastava [Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:41:16 -0500]: Has the current release team lowered the bar on Debian actually trying to follow the social contract? Is releasing on schedule more important than the SC? When I do my release work, I have certain tools, and decisions about how

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:33:49PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:46:18PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems we relied primarily on the release team, which has betrayed the goals of the project, I do not

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:31:00PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:48:50AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: While fixing these issues is and should be a goal of Debian, it's hardly something that can be done in the last few weeks before releasing. If I may make

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:23:20PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 20:18 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Apparently, our control structures are not reliable enough to _enforce_ what we have decided. It seems we relied primarily on the release team, which has betrayed

Re: Unable to connect to dbus socket.

2008-10-20 Thread Guido Loupias
Josselin Mouette schreef: If you are running a panel applet, the probable cause is that the bonobo-activation-server process from the previous session is still running and is setting this environment variable. This appears to have been the culprit. I added the snippet below to the server file

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘ lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: For me, believe it or not, it's very important not to betray the rest of developers with the actions I take in my role as a release person. Which is *not* to say I won't take any actions that makes feel one particular developer betrayed. But I do try

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘ lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, This email is an edited excerpt from Sven Luther, sent via private email. I am sending in a version I am happy to defend posting, and will try to convey as much of what Sven said as I am comfortable forwarding. I have marked where I paraphrased what Sven said. manoj On

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘ lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Ben Finney
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would think at least a meaningful justification in the bug report is required Well, apply common sense. Common sense, i.e. the policy, social contract, and DFSG that are each agreed in common by all

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Robert Millan wrote: Has the current release team lowered the bar on Debian actually trying to follow the social contract? Yes, they have. What if, instead of ranting everywhere, you actually contributed code to fix these bugs? I did... You contributed one(!) - untested

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Manoj Srivastava [Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:14:15 -0500]: Hi, But developers are not the only infliences on your decision. You have agreed to abide by the social contract, have you not? That, too, should dictate how you act within your delegated role. [...] There is nothing

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:22:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:11 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: We need the relevant maintainers to be told your unwillingness to fix this means we will not be

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Franklin PIAT
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 10:55 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 11:43 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Actually, I think we need a GR on the lines of , | http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007 | General Resolution: Handling source-less firmware in the

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘len ny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20-10-2008 19:09, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Manoj Srivastava [Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:14:15 -0500]: [...] So, could you explain your view of the issue here, without bringing in feeling of betrayal, which I do not comprehend? I agreed to

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘ lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: I agreed to abide by the social contract, but I happen to think that these lenny-ignore tags at hand are acceptable in order to get a release out, /and/ I also believe that a majority of the developers happens to think the same (otherwise I wouldn't

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-20 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 22:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: No, really. The kernel team are volunteers. Ordering them to do things doesn't help at all; one could equally well send the same message to everyone working on Debian (or, indeed, the wider community) since they could also step up to the

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:22 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le lundi 20 octobre 2008 à 16:34 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit : On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:21:24PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: What if, instead of ranting everywhere, you actually contributed code to fix these bugs? I

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-20 Thread Ben Finney
Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, bugs don't get magically fixed. You didn't do anything substantially about them, so you can hardly complain. These specific bug reports describe instances where the Debian project breaks its own promises, which is why their severity is

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 22:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:22:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:11 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: We need the relevant maintainers to be

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:38:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: When I do my release work, I have certain tools, and decisions about how to use them. One of these tools is britney, and another is the possibility of saying that certain bugs will not stop the release from happening. snip Unstable

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violatio ns are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:52:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: I think that we should not just assume that the developers think that violating the DFSG is acceptable just to release a new version. I Sure, but we shouldn't assume the contrary either, and it seems to me that a lot of

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘ lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Ben Finney
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:52:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: I think that we should not just assume that the developers think that violating the DFSG is acceptable just to release a new version. Sure, but we shouldn't assume

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘ lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:52:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: I think that we should not just assume that the developers think that violating the DFSG is acceptable just to release a new version. I Sure, but we shouldn't assume the

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘ lenny-ignore’?

2008-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:38:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: When I do my release work, I have certain tools, and decisions about how to use them. One of these tools is britney, and another is the possibility of saying that certain bugs will

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged 'lenny-ignore'?

2008-10-20 Thread Luk Claes
Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:38:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: ... and if it is *not* different, why should be the release managers be considered responsible for it? They just decide (and kudos for all their hard work,

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged 'lenny-ignore'?

2008-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, Oct 21 2008, Luk Claes wrote: Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:38:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: ... and if it is *not* different, why should be the release managers be considered responsible for it? They just

Accepted cups 1.3.9-2 (source all i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Till Kamppeter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:18:20 +0200 Source: cups Binary: libcups2 libcupsimage2 cups cups-client libcups2-dev libcupsimage2-dev cups-bsd cups-common cups-dbg cupsys cupsys-client cupsys-common cupsys-bsd cupsys-dbg libcupsys2

Accepted clamav-data 20081020.015100.8447 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Marc Haber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:47:03 + Source: clamav-data Binary: clamav-data Architecture: source all Version: 20081020.015100.8447 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marc Haber [EMAIL

Accepted sdcv 0.4.2-7 (source amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Michal Čihař
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:22:28 +0200 Source: sdcv Binary: sdcv Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.4.2-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted mantis 1.1.4+dfsg-1 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:36:35 +0200 Source: mantis Binary: mantis Architecture: source all Version: 1.1.4+dfsg-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Patrick Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Patrick Schoenfeld

Accepted sugar-sharedstate 1~git.20071117-6 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:27:32 +0200 Source: sugar-sharedstate Binary: sugar-sharedstate-classes sugar-sharingtest-activity Architecture: source all Version: 1~git.20071117-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OLPC

Accepted r-base 2.8.0-1 (source i386 all)

2008-10-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:07:59 -0500 Source: r-base Binary: r-base r-base-core r-base-dev r-mathlib r-base-html r-base-latex r-doc-pdf r-doc-html r-doc-info r-recommended r-base-core-dbg Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.8.0-1

Accepted mhddfs 0.1.16-1 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:20:10 +0400 Source: mhddfs Binary: mhddfs Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.1.16-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dmitry E. Oboukhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Dmitry E. Oboukhov [EMAIL

Accepted mhddfs 0.1.15-1 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:44:47 +0400 Source: mhddfs Binary: mhddfs Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.1.15-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dmitry E. Oboukhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Dmitry E. Oboukhov [EMAIL

Accepted mantis 1.1.2+dfsg-7 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:56:15 +0200 Source: mantis Binary: mantis Architecture: source all Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Patrick Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Patrick Schoenfeld [EMAIL

Accepted ktorrent 3.1.4+dfsg.1-1 (source i386 amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Modestas Vainius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:40:23 +0300 Source: ktorrent Binary: ktorrent ktorrent-dbg Architecture: amd64 i386 source Version: 3.1.4+dfsg.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Modestas Vainius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted sane-backends-extras 1.0.19.11 (source amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Julien BLACHE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:33:10 +0200 Source: sane-backends-extras Binary: libsane-extras libsane-extras-dev libsane-extras-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.0.19.11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Julien BLACHE

Accepted telepathy-python 0.15.2-1 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Laurent Bigonville
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:28:30 +0200 Source: telepathy-python Binary: python-telepathy Architecture: source all Version: 0.15.2-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Telepathy maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted refpolicy 2:0.0.20080702-13 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Russell Coker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:36:00 +1100 Source: refpolicy Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux-policy-mls selinux-policy-src selinux-policy-dev selinux-policy-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2:0.0.20080702-13 Distribution: unstable

Accepted redhat-cluster 2.20080801-4 (source all amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Frederik Schüler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:26:58 +0200 Source: redhat-cluster Binary: redhat-cluster-suite cman libcman2 libcman-dev libdlm2 libdlm-dev gfs-tools gfs2-tools gnbd-client gnbd-server rgmanager redhat-cluster-source Architecture: source amd64

Accepted debpool 0.3.10 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Andres Mejia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:08:49 -0400 Source: debpool Binary: debpool Architecture: source all Version: 0.3.10 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: DebPool Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andres Mejia [EMAIL

Accepted redhat-cluster 2.20080801-3 (source all amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Frederik Schüler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:49:12 +0200 Source: redhat-cluster Binary: redhat-cluster-suite cman libcman2 libcman-dev libdlm2 libdlm-dev gfs-tools gfs2-tools gnbd-client gnbd-server rgmanager redhat-cluster-source Architecture: source amd64

Accepted libticalcs4 4.6.2-1 (source amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:08:59 +0200 Source: libticalcs4 Binary: libticalcs4-dev libticalcs4 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 4.6.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted libtifiles0 0.6.6-3 (source amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:57:24 +0200 Source: libtifiles0 Binary: libtifiles0-dev libtifiles0 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.6.6-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted tilp 6.81-1 (source amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:56:06 +0200 Source: tilp Binary: tilp Architecture: source amd64 Version: 6.81-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL

Accepted mantis 1.1.2+dfsg-8 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:47:23 +0200 Source: mantis Binary: mantis Architecture: source all Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Patrick Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Patrick Schoenfeld [EMAIL

Accepted libticables3 3.9.7-1 (source amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:00:27 +0200 Source: libticables3 Binary: libticables3-dev libticables3 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.9.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted z88dk 1.8.ds1-4 (source i386 all)

2008-10-20 Thread Krystian Wlosek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2008 11:45:12 +0200 Source: z88dk Binary: z88dk-bin z88dk-doc z88dk-data z88dk Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.8.ds1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Krystian Wlosek

Accepted ktorrent 3.2~~svn873807-1 (source i386 amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Modestas Vainius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:25:42 +0300 Source: ktorrent Binary: ktorrent ktorrent-dbg Architecture: amd64 i386 source Version: 3.2~~svn873807-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Modestas Vainius [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted agrep 4.17-7 (source amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Jari Aalto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:52:00 +0300 Source: agrep Binary: agrep Architecture: source amd64 Version: 4.17-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jari Aalto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jari Aalto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

Accepted exonerate 2.2.0-1 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Charles Plessy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:18:36 +0200 Source: exonerate Binary: exonerate Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian-Med Packaging Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Charles Plessy

Accepted gammu 1.21.90-1 (source all amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Michal Čihař
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:59:13 +0200 Source: gammu Binary: gammu libgammu-dev libgammu-common libgammu4 libgammu-dbg Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.21.90-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Michal Čihař [EMAIL

Accepted gsasl 0.2.26-2 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:12:27 -0200 Source: gsasl Binary: libgsasl7-dev libgsasl7 gsasl Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.2.26-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian XMPP Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted gcc-snapshot 20081019-2 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Matthias Klose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:31:02 + Source: gcc-snapshot Binary: gcc-snapshot Architecture: source i386 Version: 20081019-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matthias

Accepted p10cfgd 1.0-13 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Bdale Garbee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:34:10 +0200 Source: p10cfgd Binary: p10cfgd Architecture: source all Version: 1.0-13 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted liblog-handler-perl 0.47-2 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread gregor herrmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:20:08 +0200 Source: liblog-handler-perl Binary: liblog-handler-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.47-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: gregor

Accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.3.2-2+lenny5 (source all i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Julien Cristau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:28:39 +0200 Source: xserver-xorg-video-intel Binary: xserver-xorg-video-intel xserver-xorg-video-intel-dbg xserver-xorg-video-i810 Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2:2.3.2-2+lenny5 Distribution: unstable

Accepted vim 2:7.2.025-2 (source i386 all)

2008-10-20 Thread James Vega
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:13:42 -0400 Source: vim Binary: vim-common vim-gui-common vim-runtime vim-doc vim-tiny vim vim-dbg vim-perl vim-python vim-ruby vim-tcl vim-gtk vim-nox vim-lesstif vim-gnome vim-full Architecture: source i386

Accepted empathy 2.24.1-1 (source all i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Laurent Bigonville
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:12:27 +0200 Source: empathy Binary: empathy libempathy-common libempathy14 libempathy-doc libempathy-dev libempathy-gtk-doc libempathy-gtk-common libempathy-gtk15 libempathy-gtk-dev python-empathy

Accepted libaio 0.3.107-3 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Guillem Jover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:36:43 +0300 Source: libaio Binary: libaio1 libaio1-udeb libaio1-dbg libaio-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.107-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted loudmouth 1.4.2-2 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Loic Minier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:20:35 +0200 Source: loudmouth Binary: libloudmouth1-dev libloudmouth1-0 libloudmouth1-0-dbg Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.4.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted lxnm 0.2.2+svn20080909-1 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:02:13 +0800 Source: lxnm Binary: lxnm Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.2.2+svn20080909-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted python-kinterbasdb 3.2-3 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Sandro Tosi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:54:48 +0200 Source: python-kinterbasdb Binary: python-kinterbasdb python-kinterbasdb-dbg Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL

Accepted node 0.3.2-5 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Joop Stakenborg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:18:36 +0200 Source: node Binary: node Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.2-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL

Accepted op 1.32-4 (source powerpc)

2008-10-20 Thread Michael Prokop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:41:12 +0200 Source: op Binary: op Architecture: source powerpc Version: 1.32-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Michael Prokop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Prokop [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted pyenchant 1.4.2-3 (source amd64)

2008-10-20 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:21:05 +0200 Source: pyenchant Binary: python-enchant Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.4.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Piotr Ożarowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Piotr Ożarowski

Accepted libpar-dist-perl 0.38-1 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread gregor herrmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:36:05 +0200 Source: libpar-dist-perl Binary: libpar-dist-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.38-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: gregor

Accepted dhelp 0.6.14 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Esteban Manchado Velázquez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:31:06 +0200 Source: dhelp Binary: dhelp Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Esteban Manchado Velázquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Esteban Manchado Velázquez

Accepted slidentd 1.0.0-6.1 (source i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:21:25 +0200 Source: slidentd Binary: slidentd Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.0-6.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: David D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL

Accepted openoffice.org-dictionaries 1:3.0.0-2 (source all)

2008-10-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:55:31 +0200 Source: openoffice.org-dictionaries Binary: openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us openoffice.org-thesaurus-cs openoffice.org-thesaurus-sk openoffice.org-thesaurus-ru openoffice.org-thesaurus-ne

Accepted clp 1.8.2-1 (source all i386)

2008-10-20 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:44:16 +0200 Source: clp Binary: coinor-libclp0 coinor-libclp-dev coinor-libclp-doc coinor-libclp0-dbg Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1.8.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Soeren

  1   2   >