On October 25, 2008 at 12:34AM +0200,
joerg (at debian.org) wrote:
> On 11548 March 1977, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
>
> >> How about integrating/merging alpaca into EasyPG?
> > Anyway, alpaca is a different implementation and well maintained by
> > the other developer. I think that the alpaca pack
On Fri, Oct 24 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:23:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 23 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
>
>> > It's all a matter of defining what your priorities are, which brings
>> > us back to the Social Contract, which says that these inclu
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:23:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> > It's all a matter of defining what your priorities are, which brings
> > us back to the Social Contract, which says that these include:
> > - 100% freeness
> > - cater best to t
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 01:02:30PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> Its a lot like exercise. Its not convenient and its not easy but in the long
> run its a good idea.
Nice pun! :)
--
Chris.
==
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god
than you do. When you understa
Hi all,
I have a problem with libtool; it's an issue that seems to have been
affecting people for years but I'm having real trouble hunting down a
solution (which I'm sure exists).
My problem is that regina-normal currently needs to build-conflict with
earlier versions of regina-normal-dev. Oth
On 11548 March 1977, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
>> How about integrating/merging alpaca into EasyPG?
> Anyway, alpaca is a different implementation and well maintained by
> the other developer. I think that the alpaca package isn't
> meaningless even if less people use alpaca than EasyPG.
There is
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:13:18PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:32:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 01:00:34AM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> > > Hi there!
> > > This mail originates from the discussion at [1]: simply, I need to move
> > > an /et
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be a good compromise between SCs #1, #3 and #4 if we made an
> exhaustive list of non-free bits in main, and make it our goal that the
> list gets smaller between each release and not to add anything to
> that list?
The last part of the sentence
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:44:33AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> Every kernel upload changing the ABI goes through NEW.
>
>> The typical situation here is that code that has the same set of DFSG
>> bugs is already in place and so it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libjabsorb-java
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Jabsorb Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jabsorb.org/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description
On October 24, 2008 at 9:18AM +0200,
siretart (at debian.org) wrote:
> How about integrating/merging alpaca into EasyPG?
I'll request the always-use-symmetric option to the EasyPG
developer, which is a major blocker of migrating from alpaca to
EasyPG, I think.
Anyway, alpaca is a different imple
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:20:43AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I can deal with a two-step install process for my video cards, as long as it
> is properly documented. But I would serioulsy recommend that we produce
> easy to use non-free installer disks to go along with the Debian
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> acceleration, right? So the box can be installed, and is usable for
> >> non-gaming purposes. The drm stuff can possibly be gotten from non
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libjakarta-ecs-java
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Stephen Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Jon S. Stevens <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jakarta.apache.org/ecs/
* License
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 16:08 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 08:36:24AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Your lack of knowledge of Debian processes sucks (that means: you
> > annoy us (at least me) with your stance and the fanatic way you defend it
> > in public, pleas
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 10:57 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > With "Like this" I mean packages that have been held back in NEW for a
> > very long time without response or REJECTED with an reason not
> > acceptable to the maintainer? Does mediating this
Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With "Like this" I mean packages that have been held back in NEW for a
> very long time without response or REJECTED with an reason not
> acceptable to the maintainer? Does mediating this kind of issues fall
> under the authority of the TC, or should t
Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, I'll add more information to the package description and
> README.Debian. Also, I'll consider the conflict of EasyPG. The
> alpaca feature should not be enabled when EasyPG's epa-file feature
> is enabled.
How about integrating/merging al
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The typical situation here is that code that has the same set of DFSG
>> bugs is already in place and so it is questionable of what a reject
>> really achieves (i.e. does the archive become more DFSG-compliant or
>> not) and quite typically fixes some
19 matches
Mail list logo
