On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Kjeldgaard Morten
wrote:
> Another model that I think has not been discussed is never freezing stable.
Freezing is the whole point of stable, if we didn't freeze it, it has
no reason to exist.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:59:30AM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
> 2008/12/22 Noah Slater :
> > Troll. Troll. Troll.
>
> I hope that's not referring to John's email.
Are you kidding?
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:36:05PM -0500, John Wiggles wrote:
> I am not a dev or woman but I believe that sexism,racism
2008/12/22 Noah Slater :
> Troll. Troll. Troll.
I hope that's not referring to John's email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> I suspect this is because Debian is loosing users. :(
>
> While we might be "losing users" to derivative distributions, that
> won't take my sleep away. And I'm not only talking about Ubuntu -
I note that Ubuntu has more than an order of mag
Troll. Troll. Troll.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I am not a dev or woman but I believe that sexism,racism and any other ism
you want to add is wrong and should be dealt with accordingly and swiftly.
Shame on the Debian Project leaders for not coming out against these people
who think that making jokes that degrade,insult and basically hurt the
fe
In article <1e8bc2f9-7665-4186-acff-79ad91461...@bioxray.au.dk> you wrote:
> Say "stable" is redefined as "bug-free" in the sense that there are no
> RC bugs in that repo. If a serious bug is found in a package, it is
> removed from stable, until the bug has been fixed in "testing".
this does
2008/12/17 Steve McIntyre :
> Luca wrote:
>>2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli :
>>
>>++file_filter(const struct dirent *dir)
>>++{
>>++ return (DT_REG == (DT_REG & dir->d_type)) ||
>>++ (DT_LNK == (DT_LNK & dir->d_type)) ;
>>++}
>>
>>But I use XFS, which seems to have some problems with d_ty
On 15/12/2008, at 21.25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Or you might use experimental, and keep unstable for lenny.
Another model that I think has not been discussed is never freezing
stable.
Say "stable" is redefined as "bug-free" in the sense that there are no
RC bugs in that repo. If a serio
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Not enabling WPAD with DNS devolution goes a long way towards dealing
>> with this mess.
>
> Would you be fine if libproxy disabled WPAD by default? I think libproxy's
> developers are willing to do that, according to [1].
Well, it's not my pac
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Thanks for your concerns. I appreciate it.
>
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Not enabling WPAD with DNS devolution goes a long way towards dealing
>> with this mess.
>
> Would you be fine if libproxy disabled WPAD by defau
Hi Florian,
Thanks for your concerns. I appreciate it.
Florian Weimer wrote:
> Not enabling WPAD with DNS devolution goes a long way towards dealing
> with this mess.
Would you be fine if libproxy disabled WPAD by default? I think libproxy's
developers are willing to do that, according to [1].
Hi, people. I'm not a DD here, so let that colour your opinions of
what I will say however it will.
I am, however, deeply interested in Debian and have done wee bits of
coding for it in the past, and keep meaning to do so more for it.
It is an unfortunate situation that often people when they're
Hi
as announced a bit earlier[1], I just changed the frequency of our dinstall
run, and as such the frequency of the mirror pushes too.
We are now having 4 runs/pushes a day. The runs start at
[01|07|13|19]:52 (every 6 hours, starting at 1:52), the mirror push
follows approximately an hour later,
Petter Reinholdtsen dijo [Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:40:45AM +0100]:
> Looking at http://popcon.debian.org/ >, it seem to me that the
> number of stable installations is dropping fast. The graph
> "popularity-contest versions in use" show this, with version 1.41
> being the one in stable.
> (...)
> T
Le Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:05:07AM +, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
> On 2008-12-20, schoappied wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I work with Debian now for a few years. And I like to help the project
> > and also learn more about it...
> > Can I become a Debian package maintainer, how? I'm especially interest
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
2008-09-02 75595
2008-09-15 76712<--
2008-10-01 76532<--
2008-10-15 77111
2008-11-01 79441
2008-11-15 79694
2008-12-01 79459
2008-12-15 79262
2008-12-20 79202
As you can see, the number of submissions have dropped the last month.
On 2008-12-21 15:14 +0100, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen (2008-12-21 14:38 +0100) wrote:
>
>> As you can see, the number of submissions have dropped the last month.
>> Not by much so far, but it used to increase every week.
>
> Maybe we want to look at the bigger picture. This is a gr
Petter Reinholdtsen (2008-12-21 14:38 +0100) wrote:
> [Florian Weimer]
>> This doesn't appear in the per-architecture statistics. Are you sure
>> you got your numbers correct?
> As you can see, the number of submissions have dropped the last month.
> Not by much so far, but it used to increase ev
[Karl Goetz]
> Or some people are doing what I did - clean install from stable ->
> testing (to see the new D-I) and not installing popcon.
Oh, I am sure some people are doing this. But for it to have an
effect on the statistics, more people need to do install lenny without
enabling popcon than t
[Florian Weimer]
> * Petter Reinholdtsen:
>
>> The number of installations using testing has been slowly increasing,
>> but not enough to compensate for the reduction in stable
>> installations. The net effect is that fewer and fewer are submitting
>> to popcon.debian.org.
>
> This doesn't appear
Quoting Steve McIntyre :
[snip]
Here's the full body of the message I sent to Sam. He contacted me
asking for my thoughts and I wrote the following:
===
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:53:24AM +1100, Sam Varghese wrote:
[snip]
I am
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 23:04 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> The above article concerns the damage that Josselin's actions cause to the
> Debian project. D-d-a is not that different from other parts of Debian, bad
> behaviour in other forums also hurts the project.
I think that flame-war thre
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:40:45 +0100
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The number of installations using testing has been slowly increasing,
> but not enough to compensate for the reduction in stable
> installations. The net effect is that fewer and fewer are submitting
> to popcon.debian.org.
Or som
On 2008-12-21 09:40 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Looking at http://popcon.debian.org/ >, it seem to me that the
> number of stable installations is dropping fast. The graph
> "popularity-contest versions in use" show this, with version 1.41
> being the one in stable.
>
> When the version i
* Petter Reinholdtsen:
> The number of installations using testing has been slowly increasing,
> but not enough to compensate for the reduction in stable
> installations. The net effect is that fewer and fewer are submitting
> to popcon.debian.org.
This doesn't appear in the per-architecture sta
Looking at http://popcon.debian.org/ >, it seem to me that the
number of stable installations is dropping fast. The graph
"popularity-contest versions in use" show this, with version 1.41
being the one in stable.
When the version in stable, testing and unstable were different (now
the same versio
schoappied writes:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > One of the smoothest paths to improving Debian and becoming a
> > contributing maintainer is to choose a Debian package that you use
> > yourself, and begin fixing some of its bugs in the bug tracking
> > system http://bugs.debian.org/>.
> >
> > This wil
28 matches
Mail list logo
