Re: "Semantic" shell? (for lack of better name)

2009-01-02 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:51:12PM -0600, Bryan Bishop wrote: > I've basically written up this email on a site as well- > http://heybryan.org/shell.html I do not see what this has to do with Debian Development. It also sounds awfully similar to what doxygen does. However, most manuals generated w

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Michael Goetze
Russ Allbery wrote: I think the following are borderline: hdparm iftop iotop ncftp nmap strace They're useful tools, many of which I use, but I'm not sure they're so useful to warrant installing them on every system by default. You can generally install them when you need them, [...] While

"Semantic" shell? (for lack of better name)

2009-01-02 Thread Bryan Bishop
Hi all, I'd like to work on a method to search for packages based off of recognized input file formats and recognized output file formats of the contained program(s). Maybe by MIME-type (RFC 2046), such as: image/gif image/jpeg image/png image/tiff video/mp4 video/mpeg application/x-latex Here's

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 19:02 +, The Fungi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:29:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > [...] > > I think installing tcpdump is sufficient; adding ethtool on top of > > it seems like overkill to me. > [...] > > It seems mii-tool from the net-tools started falling by t

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 02 janvier 2009 à 13:02 -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : > Oh, sorry, I confused it with a different program. Hm, ethtool I'd put > into the borderline category -- one argument in its favor is that you may > need it in order to fix your networking so that you can get somewhere to > instal

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 02 janvier 2009 à 18:05 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : > [Michael Goetze] > >> ... nscd ... > > > > I think that's a bad idea. It can cause some confusion when people make > > config changes that don't take effect immediately, and is hard to debug. > > It reduces the load on the

Bug#510558: ITP: sion -- frontend to manage connections to remote filesystems using GIO/GVFS

2009-01-02 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers * Package name: sion Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Enrico Tröger * URL : http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/sion/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : fronte

Re: Sections - especially section:kde and section:gnome

2009-01-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 02 janvier 2009 à 14:17 +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > Is it usable without large parts of KDE installed? web. Does it need > lots of KDE? kde. (Where lots is debatable, but kdelibs, kicker, and > some of the central parts of it would probably be a good guess) Using such criteria is

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Ben Finney
Petter Reinholdtsen writes: > The list of packages I proposed to add for Debian as a whole was this > shorter list: > > consolekit, […] ‘consolekit’ currently (as of version 0.2.10-3) ‘Depends: libx11-6’. I usually regard that dependency as an indicator of a package I don't want installed on

Changes to the DM code

2009-01-02 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hey, if you are a DM uploading your packages, please pay extra attention in the next few days. We just changed the underlying code in our archive software to be less awkward. While we did test that (using the help from Eugene V. Lyubimkin (thanks)) there might be cases not covered by our tests. T

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Russ Allbery] > The vast majority of Debian installations don't use LDAP NSS maps, > though. I know that Debian-Edu does heavily, which makes it quite > reasonable for you to want to install it, but I'm not sure it makes > sense for Debian as a whole. Note that I did not propose to install nscd

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread The Fungi
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:29:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: [...] > I think installing tcpdump is sufficient; adding ethtool on top of > it seems like overkill to me. [...] It seems mii-tool from the net-tools started falling by the wayside for a while, as gigabit Ethernet had become standard in

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:02 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Steve Langasek writes: > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:29:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> I think installing tcpdump is sufficient; adding ethtool on top of it > >> seems like overkill to me. > > > ethtool doesn't seem particularly r

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek writes: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:29:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I think installing tcpdump is sufficient; adding ethtool on top of it >> seems like overkill to me. > ethtool doesn't seem particularly related to tcpdump? Oh, sorry, I confused it with a different program

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:29:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'm honestly mystified as to why any of the following should be in > standard, given how obscure what they do seems to be: > > consolekit > > gdebi > > libpam-ck-connector Going forward, consolekit is the "standard" way to grant loca

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-01-02, Russ Allbery wrote: > include X), so if they're what use consolekit, that's not an argument for > making it standard. However, it may be a good argument for why it's not > obscure. I did check a current unstable GNOME system and saw no sign of It was mostly the obscure part I wan

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Sune Vuorela writes: > On 2009-01-02, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I'm honestly mystified as to why any of the following should be in >> standard, given how obscure what they do seems to be: >>> consolekit >>> libpam-ck-connector > Consolekit will be more and more used, at least for desktop installs

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-01-02, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'm honestly mystified as to why any of the following should be in > standard, given how obscure what they do seems to be: > >> consolekit >> libpam-ck-connector Consolekit will be more and more used, at least for desktop installs in squeeze, they will probabl

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Russ Allbery writes: > Petter Reinholdtsen writes: >> cfengine2 > I think that's rather hard to justify as priority: standard. There are a > lot of other configuration management systems in the world (and IMO much > better ones). Ah, sorry, I see this isn't in your recommended list. This is

Bug#510515: ITP: libdatetime-format-excel-perl -- Perl library to convert between DateTime and Excel dates.

2009-01-02 Thread Ivan Kohler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ivan Kohler * Package name: libdatetime-format-excel-perl Version : 0.2901 Upstream Author : Dave Rolsky * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Excel/ * License : Perl Programming Lang: Perl Description

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
I think a lot of the ones you listed already are priority: standard or higher. debian-archive-keyring, less, man-db, manpages, and wget, for example. I stopped checking after spot-checking a few; you may want to filter your list some more. Here are some I definitely disagree with that jumped out

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: > (Does nscd honor DNS TTLs properly yet? Last time I looked at it, its DNS > caching was horribly broken, but it's been quite a while.) It can't, it would be a layering violation. What one would need is to selectively apply nscd only to some maps (and *d

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Petter Reinholdtsen writes: > [Michael Goetze] >>> ... nscd ... >> I think that's a bad idea. It can cause some confusion when people make >> config changes that don't take effect immediately, and is hard to debug. > It reduces the load on the LDAP server when using LDAP for PAM/NSS, > and has

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Michael Goetze] >> ... nscd ... > > I think that's a bad idea. It can cause some confusion when people make > config changes that don't take effect immediately, and is hard to debug. It reduces the load on the LDAP server when using LDAP for PAM/NSS, and has proven to be required to avoid overlo

Re: Sections - especially section:kde and section:gnome

2009-01-02 Thread Joerg Jaspert
> I guess we actually need to consider what the sections are good for. > Asking in a random irc channel at least didn't reveal any real answers. > So what about killing the concept of sections entirely ? Sure, if at some point a replacement is suitable and *well integrated* into those Debian tools

Re: Bug#510476: ITP: LinuxCallRouter - an ISDN based PBX for Linux

2009-01-02 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Joerg Dorchain wrote: > Package: lcr LinuxCallRouter - an ISDN based PBX for Linux > Version: 1.3 (20081124) > Upstream Author: Andreas Eversberg > URL: http://isdn.eversberg.eu/download/lcr-1.3/ > Licence: GPL > Description: > Formerly known as "PBX4Linux", Linux-Call-Router is not only a route

Bug#510493: ITP: s3sync-ruby -- Sync and command tool for managing S3 Amazon buckets

2009-01-02 Thread juanrossi
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: juanro...@gmail.com * Package name: s3sync-ruby Version : 1.2.6 Upstream Author : s3sync.net * URL : http://s3sync.net/ * License : Other Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Sync and command tool for managing S3

Re: Override changes: LSB Commands and Utilities

2009-01-02 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 13:34 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Hi > > after some discussion within the ftpteam we just modified a few override > entries (15 to be exact). The following packages moved from standard to > optional: I have had a look at the "LSB Core" specification version 3.2. The sectio

Re: dcut

2009-01-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > Hi Hello, > I've got an interrupted upload to ftp.upload.debian.org, leaving stale > files in the queue. > > I tried to clean up those using > dcut -kyo...@debian.org rm stale_files > > but that was silently ignored. > > I was then able to remove stale files by

Re: Sections - especially section:kde and section:gnome

2009-01-02 Thread William Pitcock
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:43 +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > I guess we actually need to consider what the sections are good for. > Asking in a random irc channel at least didn't reveal any real > answers. > So what about killing the concept of sections entirely ? The primary user of section: is packa

Re: Sections - especially section:kde and section:gnome

2009-01-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-01-02, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > >> What is the correct usage of this section? >> Is it for packages that is related to the desktop itself or is it for >> packages that links against kdelibs ? > >> Should a game using kdelibs go to section:games or section:kde? > > games. > >> should a web br

dcut

2009-01-02 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hi I've got an interrupted upload to ftp.upload.debian.org, leaving stale files in the queue. I tried to clean up those using dcut -kyo...@debian.org rm stale_files but that was silently ignored. I was then able to remove stale files by setting DEBEMAIL and DEBFULLNAME and then running 'dcut

Re: Sections - especially section:kde and section:gnome

2009-01-02 Thread Joerg Jaspert
> What is the correct usage of this section? > Is it for packages that is related to the desktop itself or is it for > packages that links against kdelibs ? > Should a game using kdelibs go to section:games or section:kde? games. > should a web browser using kdelibs go to section:web or section

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Michael Goetze
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > In Debian Edu, we concluded that more packages than the Debian > Standard packages are needed in all installations, and install these > packages by default for any profile: > ... nscd ... I think that's a bad idea. It can cause some confusion when people make config c

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

2009-01-02 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Steve Langasek] > Hmm, come to think of it, we ought to replace the 'ftp' package in > standard with something more usable, such as lftp or ncftp... In Debian Edu, we concluded that more packages than the Debian Standard packages are needed in all installations, and install these packages by def

Bug#510476: ITP: LinuxCallRouter - an ISDN based PBX for Linux

2009-01-02 Thread Joerg Dorchain
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package: lcr LinuxCallRouter - an ISDN based PBX for Linux Version: 1.3 (20081124) Upstream Author: Andreas Eversberg URL: http://isdn.eversberg.eu/download/lcr-1.3/ Licence: GPL Description: Formerly known as "PBX4Linux", Linux-Call-Router is not only a router,

Sections - especially section:kde and section:gnome

2009-01-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi! I have been wondering over the last months about Section: kde. What is the correct usage of this section? Is it for packages that is related to the desktop itself or is it for packages that links against kdelibs ? Should a game using kdelibs go to section:games or section:kde? should a web b